Bozo Erectus
Master Baker
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2003
- Messages
- 22,389
True, you'll never go broke betting on that.PrinceOfLeigh said:Predictions of violence in the Balkans, great prescience.
True, you'll never go broke betting on that.PrinceOfLeigh said:Predictions of violence in the Balkans, great prescience.
Bozo Erectus said:I hate to rain on the parade, but this seperation isnt going to prevent future violence, its going to directly lead to a new conflict.
Absolutely nothing solid. Just a little knowledge of history, human nature, and the certainty that the splitting up of assets is going to cause enormous amount of resentment in Serbia. Losing access to the Adriatic wont go down very well in Serbia Id imagine.Winner said:Bold statement, anything to back it up?
Bozo Erectus said:Absolutely nothing solid. Just a little knowledge of history, human nature, and the certainty that the splitting up of assets is going to cause enormous amount of resentment in Serbia. Losing access to the Adriatic wont go down very well in Serbia Id imagine.
Well I certainly hope that Im just being a pessimist, and everything goes well for them both. Correct me if Im wrong, you know alot more about it than I do, but the big difference in the break up of Czechoslovakia was that the poor part of the country, Slovakia, inexplicably wanted to end its association with the more prosperous Czech part. The difference here being that Montenegro, the side that wants seperation, is the more prosperous one. Is that right?Winner said:In my opinion (and experience), the peacefull split-up is always a good thing, because otherwise it can be only worse. When two countries seperate peacefully, their relations become better than they were in one quasi-federation with constant bickering and disputes over absurdities.
Czechs and Slovaks have much better relations now, when we are seperate. It helped to settle things a bit. I know our experience isn't fully relevant to Balkans, but Serbia seems to be down now. Too down, in my opinion. If the West forces them to let Kosovo go, it will be a big mistake.
Yep, I didnt see your post, but it almost could be in response to it.Hakim said:I think MonteNegro have a lot of serb inhabitants.
Bozo Erectus said:Well I certainly hope that Im just being a pessimist, and everything goes well for them both.
Correct me if Im wrong, you know alot more about it than I do, but the big difference in the break up of Czechoslovakia was that the poor part of the country, Slovakia, inexplicably wanted to end its association with the more prosperous Czech part. The difference here being that Montenegro, the side that wants seperation, is the more prosperous one. Is that right?
Winner said:Well, it's more complicated. In fact, a not well known fact, it was us who seperated. Slovaks wanted a sort of confederation (you know, that entity of two independent states which cannot agree on a single thing) with Czechs, but with their own currency, army, foreign policy and so on. Our government realized that the only thing they really want is our money (in federal Czechoslovakia, the budged was divided a fifty-fifty, so the poorer Slovakia generating only 1/3 of the GDP received 1/2 of the federal funding) so it presented them with an ultimatum: you will either agree on a viable one-state solution (a functioning federation) and we will then continue to fund you, or we will go separate. You know how the story ended.
Montenegro is maybe a bit more developed, but it is very, very small. Serbia has about 10 millions of inhabitants, Montenegro about 600,000. The only importance it may have is that it provides Serbia with an access to the sea. That's all, nothing to fight for, especially with whole Europe watching you.
Winner said:God forbid!![]()
Bozo Erectus said:Ah, thanks for explaining the Czech-Slovak seperation, I didnt know about the Slovaks proposing a confederation.
Montenegro sounds like a prosperous city state, a fat little plum destined to be gobbled up![]()