Don't forget the "separate but equal" rule, which enabled whites to segregate blacks from their white society and their seal h. Which is what triggered whites in Oklahoma in 1922 when they slaughtered at least 300 people of color and burned dozens of blocks of residences andbusiness. Greenville, aka "The Black Wall Street", was never rebuilt, most of the land was scooped up by whites when white banks refused to loan money to rebuild. Aso, not one person was ever arrested, much less charged with a crime, in connection with this genocidal act.
You're talking about the private zector, not government.
Sorry, was meaning to say optimal sum of reward isn't the equilibrium of that dilemma. I think there are dynamic systems that exist no equilibrium, one of such is the solar system, which is harmonic.
Maybe it is really efficient nowadays or maybe it is not. Isn't waiting for market fixing itself a simpler solution that enacts unnatural laws based on some controversial theories that hasn't reached a consensus?
www.brookings.edu
Sorry, was meaning to say optimal sum of reward isn't the equilibrium of that dilemma. I think there are dynamic systems that exist no equilibrium, one of such is the solar system, which is harmonic.
Maybe it is really efficient nowadays or maybe it is not. Isn't waiting for market fixing itself a simpler solution that enacts unnatural laws based on some controversial theories that hasn't reached a consensus?
If most of society already accepted CRT, there shouldn't be any visible difference in opportunity in $ bracket for any "underprivileged" race. (It is not per $ because opportunity and $ should not have linearity, it would be like, you know, something like opportunity = a*2^$).
Making statistics not considering $ of each race is bs because $ per capita in each race vastly different. We all know and accept people with higher $ having more opportunity, right?
-
Let's imagine that people with those particular features, are harder to get certain jobs. Well the above thing is true, everyone knows being ugly decrease your wage in some jobs.
Most importantly, ugliness is subjective, and there are evidences that people are attracted to people that look like them.
Hiring the people in same biological "race" might help something like advertisements and customer service gaining more attraction passively, which might have some good effect somehow.
The demand of people of a particular dominant race (race with highest purchasing power, not race with most people) increases the price to hire those in those particular field.
That's very natural and there are absolutely nothing wrong with that. It's our specie's bias.
And making statistics without excluding all of those particular kinds of jobs, is wrong too.
-
There are many hidden factors that we don't know, so instead of trying to do social engineering, let nature balance it out.
Let the free market choose what to do and trust its decision.
Imagine a world that needs laws to tell people stop racism, horrible.
-
California Tries to Close the Gap in Math, but Sets Off a Backlash (Published 2021)
Proposed guidelines in the state would de-emphasize calculus, reject the idea that some children are naturally gifted and build a connection to social justice. Critics say math shouldn’t be political.www.nytimes.com
People are blinded by race when making statistics, while $ shows a greater correlation.Race gaps in SAT math scores are as big as ever | Brookings
Education has long been cast as the “great equalizer” of American society. Post-secondary colleges, and in particular public universities, are especially prized as engines of upward mobility. As recent research by Raj Chetty, John Friedman, Emmanuel Saez, Nicholas Turner, and Danny Yagan shows...
Equal wage is morally wrong.
-
How to make right statistics on those social problems? Idk, ask god.
The sum of the reward in a multi game, multi partner version:Sorry, was meaning to say optimal sum of reward isn't the equilibrium of that dilemma. I think there are dynamic systems that exist no equilibrium, one of such is the solar system, which is harmonic.
Maybe it is really efficient nowadays or maybe it is not. Isn't waiting for market fixing itself a simpler solution that enacts unnatural laws based on some controversial theories that hasn't reached a consensus?
If most of society already accepted CRT, there shouldn't be any visible difference in opportunity in $ bracket for any "underprivileged" race. (It is not per $ because opportunity and $ should not have linearity, it would be like, you know, something like opportunity = a*2^$).
Making statistics not considering $ of each race is bs because $ per capita in each race vastly different. We all know and accept people with higher $ having more opportunity, right?
-
Let's imagine that people with those particular features, are harder to get certain jobs. Well the above thing is true, everyone knows being ugly decrease your wage in some jobs.
Most importantly, ugliness is subjective, and there are evidences that people are attracted to people that look like them.
Hiring the people in same biological "race" might help something like advertisements and customer service gaining more attraction passively, which might have some good effect somehow.
The demand of people of a particular dominant race (race with highest purchasing power, not race with most people) increases the price to hire those in those particular field.
That's very natural and there are absolutely nothing wrong with that. It's our specie's bias.
And making statistics without excluding all of those particular kinds of jobs, is wrong too.
-
There are many hidden factors that we don't know, so instead of trying to do social engineering, let nature balance it out.
Let the free market choose what to do and trust its decision.
Imagine a world that needs laws to tell people stop racism, horrible.
-
California Tries to Close the Gap in Math, but Sets Off a Backlash (Published 2021)
Proposed guidelines in the state would de-emphasize calculus, reject the idea that some children are naturally gifted and build a connection to social justice. Critics say math shouldn’t be political.People are blinded by race when making statistics, while $ shows a greater correlation.Race gaps in SAT math scores are as big as ever | Brookings
Education has long been cast as the “great equalizer” of American society. Post-secondary colleges, and in particular public universities, are especially prized as engines of upward mobility. As recent research by Raj Chetty, John Friedman, Emmanuel Saez, Nicholas Turner, and Danny Yagan shows...
Equal wage is morally wrong.
-
How to make right statistics on those social problems? Idk, ask god.
| Prisoner's Dilemma | Cooperate | Defect |
| Cooperate | 3 + 3 = 6 | 1 + 4 = 5 |
| Defect | 4 + 1 = 5 | 2 + 2 = 4 |
yeah but equilibrium is when both defect, yields the sum of reward of 4, is that correct, which is not the most optimal sum of reward but the optimal for each player.
Depends on what you mean by "results". There are common contexts where convincing the other party is very, very unlikely, so aiming for that result is unrealistic. But the audience might reap benefits - some could be convinced, and some could be heartened that you're taking their side. Especially important when a majority is oppressing a minority.
I literally haven't seen this happen in nearly a decade of doing them. Have you?
