Of course. There is a sort of vanity in that which is not always wrong. But it also highlights a fundamental weakness of the frame pivot from discrimination to privilege. If the story is told in the lens of discrimination, you have a hero(es). They have companions, and allies, and enemies, and the non-involved. The story, as it passes down, invites choosing the side of good. When the privilege is inborn, and the history immutable because the numberlords need to have a nice simple easy-virtue to knock down targets, it doesn't. The history is written, those who were wrong are wrong, and the strength of potential allies is ill-gotten.
The frame is terrible and heavy*. And the people imperfect and fickle. It doesn't bring out the best. Or, at the very least, its a degradation of what could be better.
*and yes, misused by malice. Of course.