Dismaland

Disney is hardly a "low-brow form of entertainment":

NY Times Book Reviews: Kicking Some Sand Into Powerful Faces

"Team Rodent" was published last month and immediately made it onto the New York Times business best-seller list. In the book, Mr. Hiaasen, a best-selling crime novelist and a columnist for The Miami Herald, attacks -- informatively and hilariously -- the Disneyfication of the globe, with special attention to Florida and Times Square. (The latter, a once "skanky oozepot" of sleaze, tested our taste and tolerance, he argues. And revulsion, unlike the Mickey and Minnie garden statues at the enormous new Disney Store on 42d Street, is "essential to the human experience.")

The author says that over all, the Walt Disney Company is well run and even progressive in its policies toward its gay employees. And he discloses that he has made the parental pilgrimage to Disney World in Orlando, Fla. So what does he hate about the House of the Mouse?

For starters, its wholesome-image machine The company produces gritty rap music through its records unit, he notes, and distributes violent movies like "Pulp Fiction" even as it makes "101 Dalmatians.". One extremely funny chapter chronicles a frantic day last year when Disney's Hollywood Records division released, then withdrew, an album that contained filthy lyrics by a group called the Insane Clown Posse.

Mr. Hiaasen also condemns the company for the trample of tourists into Florida -- soon to reach about 46 million annually -- and for what he calls endless "roadside schlock" set up to relieve these Disney World pilgrims of any leftover cash. Paradoxically, he says, the only relief now from the ugly sprawl (once cattle ranches and fruit orchards) is the verdant Disney complex itself.

But his biggest complaint is against Disney's sheer power -- over our imaginations, municipalities and media. The company "touches virtually every human being in America for a profit," he writes, with its theme parks, movie companies and television networks. For baby boomers especially, he notes, Disney is the "benign enchanter-protector," an image embedded "in the collective parental psyche."

Mr. Hiaasen's sharp irreverence works wonderfully, as he takes jabs at Disney's new cruise ship and privately owned Caribbean island; its chairman, Michael D. Eisner, and what he calls its "shell municipality" in Florida -- the Reedy Creek Improvement District, a kind of parallel government, a "Vatican with mouse ears," in the words of a friend he quotes.

A special gem is the chapter on the "world's largest press party" given at Disney World to commemorate the bicentennial of the United States Constitution and the resort's 15th anniversary. The 5,200 people in attendance were offered mounds of food and souvenirs. They also got the chance to see a respected colleague -- a weary Nick Daniloff, the U.S. News and World Report writer wrongly jailed by the Soviets for spying -- welcomed back to America with outstretched arms. The furry arms, of course, of Mickey Mouse.

Criticism of The Walt Disney Company

The Guardian: Repressed Brits, evil Mexicans, Arab villains: why are Hollywood's animated movies full of racist stereotypes?

Here in Florida, we are all too familiar with the evil mouse.

557097014.jpeg.jpg
 
A big steamy pile of crap filled with trendy guilt filled folks who really enjoy being dismal. Not my thing. :)
 
Why do so many conservatives openly despise art? Well, any art that isn't reminiscent of Norman Rockwell...
 
More like ordinary people who woke up from this nightmare of being happy little miserable consumers pleasing the ever more pealing facade of the shambles thats our current society.
 
Plenty of liberals do too. Just look at Carl Hiaasen's open distaste for a company that has made art available to billions.
 
What? Hey if my generation wanted to be treated like crap we had Paris. If we wished to see something dismal there's always Detroit. If a person doesn't want to consume something they don't have to, and if getting bombarded by the advertisements of consumerland is irritating there's always the Philippines. That's not the question. The question is, what is so wrong with people who would pay to go to dismaland? Place looks dismal. That's free by the way, its called New Jersey.
 
If it's any consolation you have not been much right lately.
 
I suppose there are those who needed something to replace the emotional loss created by the fall of the Iron Curtain, and to fill the sense of profound grief created by the demise of East German communism. If we can't have the Stasi any longer what can fill the void caused by the loss of all that misery?

Dismaland!

In case the planet isn't scrod enough to meet your needs.
 
Seems like a waste of the formerly world's largest outdoor swimming pool to me, but I like swimming pools.
 
Tims, how do you like the new sig?
 
I know you asked Tim but it’s a splendid testament to how the point goes to waste far too often and how important it is to also speak to people in very easy to understand words.
 
Bloody hell, I don't even have to exit my country in order to visit this fair.

In other words, the Economic Ministry has introduced a new plan: turn Bulgaria in to a giant dismalfair theme park. According to calculations, the GDP increase of the country would be a thousandfold.
 
Disney is hardly a "low-brow form of entertainment":

I really don't understand what you mean by this. I'd say Disney caters for the lowest common denominator (otherwise how could it be so popular?), which is not necessarily a bad thing in itself, but it's exactly what's meant by "low-brow" imo.

I can see that you've put "low-brow form of entertainment" in quotes, so perhaps you mean it ironically. But then I can't understand what you might mean ironically. "Ironically".

Btw, I'm quite fiercely anti-Disneyland myself. But I do recognize my own unwarranted prejudices in this. Very, very many people absolutely love the place. And I'm all in favour of people enjoying themselves as long as it harms no one else.
 
I just find it amusing that people generally liked Banksy until he took aim at Disney with Dismaland. Now it's hate all the way. I suppose the lesson here is don't mess with Disney.

I think you may be misinterpreting the data. I suspect that many of the people in that "hate all the way" crowd had just never heard of him before. I doubt that taking on Disney really changed many opinions, it just brought him to the attention of more people...and people who hadn't previously sought him out are probably inclined not to like him particularly.

For my part I went from "never heard of him" to "don't particularly care," but some people are sensitive to having their attention grabbed.
 
I really don't understand what you mean by this. I'd say Disney caters for the lowest common denominator (otherwise how could it be so popular?), which is not necessarily a bad thing in itself, but it's exactly what's meant by "low-brow" imo.
"Low-brow entertainment" are things like carnivals, state and county fairs, professional wrestling, reality TV, Springer, etc.

Disney is actually just the opposite of that. They pretend they are a wholesome family-oriented business which has no "low brow" aspects at all, when what they really care about is exploiting as many gullible consumers as they possibly can using whatever means they can.

They may have been a time long ago when Walt Disney wasn't so hypocritical as he later became. But those days are long over. This isn't any Mouseketeers show anymore.

abritney-spears-hot-2.jpg


a+falac+hanna+montana.jpg


aaadonald_duck-1.jpg



Warning. Adult language and sexual references.


Link to video.

Btw, I'm quite fiercely anti-Disneyland myself. But I do recognize my own unwarranted prejudices in this. Very, very many people absolutely love the place. And I'm all in favour of people enjoying themselves as long as it harms no one else.
I'm only really opposed to it based on the rampant hypocrisy and the damage it has done to Florida, especially central Florida. And they don't even pay their fair share of taxes, which is why they came here in the first place.
 
Back
Top Bottom