azzaman333
meh
I like Bill, lol.
Don't say I didn't warn you.
I like Bill, lol.
Government by the intellectuals: Bolshevik Russia, almost.
Totally unrelated question, CG: how did you get the shadows and texturing on Alyx to work that way? It looks amazing, but not at all like HL2 looks normally.
That does those effects too, not just posing? I didn't realize that that was within the capabilities of the Source engine at all. Good stuff.
Compared to most of you guys, I'm friggin' Noam Chomsky.
Fixed, since two of them are dead.Voltaireiswas an intellectual. John Lockeiswas an intellectual. Richard Dawkins is anintellectualdouche bag.
No, certaintly not. I wish we could see who did vote yes...
No, certaintly not. I wish we could see who did vote yes...
Pity a noob and please tell me who this Sidhe person is?
Do You Consider Yourself to be an Intellectual?
All I will say is that him claiming himself to be an intellectual sparked a huge fireball of a thread in which he got jumped on six ways to Sunday. It was awesome.
Can you dig it out? I dont remember that but it sounds funny...
Someone who creates knowledge is someone who does things like research or scholarly papers. Essentially most academia, but not all of it, and can include things out of academia itself like some authors, who supply usable philosophies for the general public. It's a matter of creating ideas. My point with the "full-time philosopher" thing is that it's not a class that amateurs are a part of.These definitions of Intellectual seem rather arbitrary. What do you mean by "creates knowledge," and why would one need to become a "full time philosopher" in order to do that?
That's because the concept of an Intellectual is rather new. The word was born out of the french intellectual movement in the 1800s - people of the pen who influenced politics. See the Dreyfus Affair.The distinction between adjective or noun is a fairly recent one that still doesn't exist in many languages.
Words arn't defined by their etymology. Not even remotely. Semantic shift.Fro an etymological standpoint, I'd say that intellectual means "pertaining to reading between the lines."
Dawkins may be a douchebag, but that has nothing to do with the fact that he's still an intellectual, being both a research scientist and a public intellectual who speaks about various issues of social or political import. Besides, don't you know how douchebaggy Voltaire was? Being a polemicist in intellectual matters is a fine example of what an Intellectual is.VRWCAgent said:Fixed, since two of them are dead.
Anyone can create knowledge. Even Charlie figured out a better way to rearrange the machines. Til he fergot it all.Pertaining to the definition as someone who creates knowledge, then no.
No. But I do think I'm more of an intellectual than almost anyone else around my age that I know in real life.
I define intellectual as someone who is very cultured, has had many contacts with many kinds of ideas around the world and actually does something to improve the knowledge that he has (e.g. research, write professionally, etc).