That is really just asking for trouble though. The tax authorities aren't daft. You might get away with not declaring cash on a bit of casual gardening, or cleaning jobs, but anything else and they're going to have a really good idea of how much business you're doing and the extent to which you're likely not declaring income. And besides, when it comes to finding additional finance from a lender like a bank, don't you want not to have any undeclared income?
As for money laundering activities (which seem to be related to cash transactions in a way), well... you tell me. It's a major problem for criminal organizations to re-legitimize their income streams and I think it costs them dear. To the extent that it might be worthwhile them considering legitimate businesses in the first place.
Casinos are excellent places for money laundering, btw. Who knows how much money really walks in the door and how much walks out? And who's going to tell anyone?
Hardee's?Why do all the bad American chains get exported...
No. Just an inconsistent one, depending upon your reasons.
I support local when I can, though I do shop on Amazon occasionally because its easy.
Outside of that, I pretty much exclusively use cash (beyond paying bills), especially at small businesses.
Well studies show people are more wasteful with cards. When I drop $120 in cash I 'feel it' more.Huh...do you find using cash gives you any benefits over using cards?
I haven't used cash in years, due entirely to laziness.
Well studies show people are more wasteful with cards. When I drop $120 in cash I 'feel it' more.
When you use card money theres always a worry that you're overspending. If I know I'm giving myself say $250 for the week I can feel see visual evidence that I'm getting low (which may be motivating to get more).
Gene editing is not working. Yet.
Gene editing uses a method called Crispr that has rapidly become a research stalwart. It exploits a system that bacteria use to protect themselves from viruses and allows researchers to cut out selected genes and insert new ones.
A pressing question, said Rudolf Jaenisch, an M.I.T. biology professor, is why anyone would want to edit the genes of human embryos to prevent disease. Even in the most severe cases, involving diseases like Huntington’s in which a single copy of a mutated gene inherited from either parent is enough to cause the disease with 100 percent certainty, editing poses ethical problems. Because of the way genes are distributed in embryos, when one parent has the gene, only half of the parent’s embryos will inherit it. With gene editing, the cutting and pasting has to start immediately, in a fertilized egg, before it is possible to know if an embryo has the Huntington’s gene. That means half the embryos that were edited would have been normal — their DNA would have been forever altered for no reason. “It is unacceptable to mutate normal embryos,” Dr. Jaenisch said. “For me, that means there is no application.”
No worries, at least you're not posting about manhole covers for some reason or something.
Sorry, I'm just confused as to what this has to do with this thread? Was it perhaps meant for a different discussion...maybe the GMO one?![]()