rmsharpe said:Regardless of any evidence we present that North Korea is a totalitarian Stalinist state, you will have a convenient excuse to ignore or attempt to "refute" that evidence with North Korean state propaganda.
In short, you're a lost cause. There is absolutely no room for reason with you. That is why there's no point in continuing tihs discussion.
This thread would be funny if there weren't four million dead Koreans at the hands of your best friends.Pasi Nurminen said:I have no problem being in the minority with my opinions (the use of the word "opinion," instead of a more concrete term such as "knowledge," should in and of itself be evidence of an open mind), as that's part of the fun in life.
Pasi Nurminen said:No, of course not, but you're willing to convict that which you do not know, while I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.
Kan' Sharuminar said:Or are you saying you can only know a country if you've been to it?
What I stated is the consensus among all experts on international relations. Since Brazil is an irrelevant nation, I can guarantee that brazilian international relations experts have no vested interests regarding NK whatsoever.Pasi Nurminen said:There are no reliable sources that will back you up on this matter. The only ones that matter have a vested interest in keeping your opinion of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea negative, and those that don't matter couldn't possibly have the credentials to know anything.
Try going to NK then. What I stated is a fact, foreigners are not allowed to take pictures without previous authorization from the gvt. Ask anyone who has been there, or try to go there yourself (since you're in Beijing it's not that far).Pasi Nurminen said:That's great, well as soon as you get your "friend" here on these forums, or in contact with me somehow, then saying such might contribute something. Otherwise, your "friend" is a useless source of information. You may as well tell me you read it on p430 of a book in your public library.
Other nations also depended strongly on tarde with the USSR, why didn't they go through massive famines like NK?Pasi Nurminen said:Do not twist my words. Have you not read any of my Democratic People's Republic of Korea oriented posts in other threads? I state emphatically that there are and have been hardships in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea since the Soviet Union collapsed. The difference between you and I is that I'm not some ignorant philistine going around ranting "OMG DICTATORR STARVING HIS POEPLE LOLZ" and instead choose to examine rationally the causes of the hardships the people of the DPRK are currently experiencing. The famine is over, it is receding. It will take some time to reach pre-1994 levels of prosperity (need I remind you, for most of the two nations' history as separate states, the DPRK was far more prosperous than the ROK), but they're getting there.
Symphony D. said:It could also have something to do with the fact that Communism has never actually been put into practice, nor is it even really a political system. It was Marx's theory of history. He just assumed Communism was the inevitable end result. So far, he's been proven wrong.
A few power-hungry individuals, such as Lenin, decided "Hey, this is a pretty good tool to rally the poor masses around so we can usurp power, lets say we're trying to bring it about so they'll follow us."
And so they set about it. Of course, none of the "Communist" governments have ever been "Communist". It was, for example, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. This is mostly because Marx never stated how the Proletariat would magically come to power. These governments never clarified it, because they never intended to allow it to happen. Why? Because if everyone is "equal", not only does the specialized job economy upon which all modern society relies collapse, but so does government (the natural end state of Communism, as defined by Marx, is a classless and stateless and composed of total equality; effectively an Anarchy), as any government official would be out of a job, and out of power, which is why all this was done in the first place.
So, is North Korea "Communist", in the ideal sense of the word? No. Has there ever been a "Communist" country, in the ideal sense of the word? No.
Is North Korea a brutal, Stalinist regime bent on oppressing the masses and seeking ever greater power and glory for itself? You bet. Close enough for a "yes" since that's what most other "Communist" countries were anyway (and it's a nice catch-all label for them and their ilk): the tool for a single charismatic man to subjugate all others to his bidding while distracting them with fairy-tales of liberation.
How about footage smuggled out of North Korea, of the North Koreans executing criminals?Pasi Nurminen said:Forgive me, I did not see this post initially.
You must find alternate sources. I am in Beijing, and both the websites you cited are blocked by Chinese censors. In any event, Wikipedia is a poor source for information on the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, since it flies in the face of the concept of expertise and is subject to the whims of the ignorant Western masses who are deliberately misinformed and lied to about the DPRK by corporate and political interests in the Western world.
I seem to remember that in another thread, Pasi's "evidence" consisted of a person he was in contact with on another forum, claiming to be from North Korea (despite NK having no internet).Babbler said:Pasi, most leftists - nay, sane human beings - have realized that North Korea - nay, the entire "communist" bloc (Soviet Union, PRC et al.) has been a great failure. Elections are a sham, there really is a personality cult and entire mountainsides are used for prisions. The North Koreas are staving, supplied only with Chinese and American aid. They are developing nuclear weapons because that the only way any of the great powers would care about them.
I have admit - I laugh reading this thread.
I saw that today.nonconformist said:How about footage smuggled out of North Korea, of the North Koreans executing criminals?
Standard North Korean execution; tieing the victim to a post, with rope around the head/eyes, chest, and knees, in fromt of a readily dug grave.
Then, a group of three riflemen,. from a distance of two metres, fire at each of the ropes, head, chest, and knee, each volley cutting the nextg rope, until the corpse falls into the grave and the grave filled.
The crime? Attempting to escape North Korea.