King_Antonius
Chieftain
Down with the Red coats! Yay independence! lol jk although I do have a weird phobia of British people even though I am part British along with a bunch of other stuff...
Football - real football - American football - is this here country's national pastime. Baseball's a joke. And cricket isn't all that bad. It's funny to watch Harbhajan Singh get banned all the time, he's like Perfy back in the day.The worst thing is that they prefer the horrific, abominable, atrocious and gruesome sport of baseball above the noble game of cricket.
American Football is for those too scared to play rugbyFootball - real football - American football - is this here country's national pastime.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
A bit of founding father envy there, Princeps?![]()
The south tried that once............
What would it have changed? The Declaration of Independence was a polemic, and people are going to be angry with the British or happy with them based on the not so oft-quoted stuff that got put later on in the document. "These dudes did this stuff to us, we don't like it, we're pissed, screw them, we want 'em to leave." We just quote it now because it's iconic, but that doesn't mean it was supposed to sway people with a well-reasoned philosophical argument.Okay, so why didn't the British respond like this: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created to serve us, that we are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Guns, Power and the pursuit to dominate the Americas through force."
No they didn't.
You mean slaves right? Because not all slaves were black and not all slave owners were white. There were free blacks too you know. There were even black CSA soldiers who fought for the south. Not forced slaves.
My God was Thomas Jefferson was lazy. He makes pretty extraordinary claims here, and he should provide and extraordinary argument, but no. He didn't even bother to provide any meaningful argument at all. He just say that it's so.
Okay, so why didn't the British respond like this: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created to serve us, that we are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Guns, Power and the pursuit to dominate the Americas through force." The British did make such claims, after all, they believed that their king or queen, those spoiled and well-dressed mammals, had the God bestowed right to rule over his or her subjects. The American leadership, apparently, believed that all men had a god given right to Liberty, life and to the pursuit of happiness (and right to own women and negroes, of course). On who's side was God, that celestial dictator?
But anyway, of course the founding fathers didn't believe that these were universal or unalianable rights, Thomas Jefferson just wrote it that way, because it sounds better, to claim that certain rights are universal and unalianable, rather than just scribbling something like: "look, we want the following: blah,blah, blah, and traffs at this level, and anti-dumping legislation, etc".
![]()
Yes losersRight! Then they were violating those peoples liberty too! Yes they were. Where did I say they didn't?
Why can you not just admit that they were hypocrites as well as the founding fathers?I didn't know I had too. Can you show me where I said they weren't?
"No taxation without representation! We shall not have our rights infringed on by someone who views them selves as superior by birthright! Down with the Crown!"Money. Did you know that the south left because of money?
"Oh, I'm sorry negra, women and other various minorities, but we believe we are superior to you by birthright, so no cigar."Actually land owners had full even black ones. A black land owning man could vote. And all black men could vote.
"This is unfair! States' Rights! Down with the domination by the Northern Agressors! EAAAARGH! LIBERTY!"Yes it was unfair.
" 'Cept none for you slave losers lol"
Yes losers![]()
Money. Did you know that the south left because of money?
Actually land owners had full even black ones. A black land owning man could vote. And all black men could vote.
1/5 but they could still vote.Then what in the Hell are you arguing with me for? The entire premise for me getting into this argument was to point out how you using the example of the Confederacy as a people who stood up to oppression is flawed because they were people wo carried out oppression of their own. And so did the founding fathers.
Oh, really? So what's happened to Sates' Rights?You mean states rights like the states being able to trade cotton to europe with out the northern middle man? Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness? That's what you quoted from me and said that the South was only trying to achieve that. And they were. Or were the founding fathers not fighting for Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness either because they were oppressors of slaves too.
And how much were their votes worth?![]()
Liberté, égalité, fraternité!
Right?