Drama at the UN

[RegentMan]

The question came up at the UN whether or not to wait for Warlords to start. Everyone responded with a strong "Start ASAP!" andy.smaga, one of the co-admins, said that he would only co-admin a game that uses Warlords.

So, we're down to DaveShack and Rik Meleet. Two teams still need to submit their info to the map maker, so until they do... *twidles thumbs*

I can't see how the teams have waited this long to discuss such things. They should have been done by now!

 

[robboo]

Did Andy give a reason why for his warlords only stance?

/also if we get warlords does anyone know if it will effect play in "normal Civ 4" or will it a sorta stand alone.

 

[Emp.Napoleon]

Let us start now, Warlords will need to be tested for exploits etc. Plus, not everyone will have it right when it comes out. Maybe we could have the finals in Warlords.

Some of these teams I think have said they will field a team and don't know much about the ISDG (how long it is, how much effort is needed.) Some of these forums are super small and I would hate to see them just say one day we are done. The fact that some take so long to get anything approved I think is showing the start of this.

 

[BCLG100]

i think we have too many teams involved in this competition tbh.

 

[lost_civantares]

Stupid question, but where is the UN? I really only go to civfanatics for gameing sites.

 

[RegentMan]

Link to UN.

I agree, fourteen teams is a lot. But the ISDG originally had twelve teams, and we got through round one and are now on round two. Hopefully the smaller forums will stick with it. I can't imagine one of them simply quitting.

 

[classical_hero]

This has taken way too long to get started. I am bored with this.

 

[Karl Townsend]

i aggre with using warlords in the final round adds a little twist ^_^