Pages in a deeply flawed, spiteful and proved wrong book Vs Science
Exactly, according to you we are debating The Origin of Species by Charles Darwin VS Science![]()
When I went into WH Smiths in Wells, they had the Origin of Species under fiction.Exactly, according to you we are debating The Origin of Species by Charles Darwin VS Science![]()
Domination, that's not even slightly amusing. You'd scream blue murder if we tried that sort of thing with you, so don't do it yourself.
Okay, in the interest of provoking actual discussion, is there anyone here who actually believes Noah rode around in a boat, taking care of two of every animal and all that?
[Yep, and proud of it! /QUOTE]
Personally I'm more proud of.. say, reasonable beliefs, logical conclusions and supporting evidence which validates a given point.
But all their own I suppose...
Historical fiction is still fiction.@Haseri- Yet everyone agrees the Bible has quite a bit of historical fact in it, so that makes no sense.
I heard they found the remains of Noah's Ark somewhere in Turkey, and that the only way to see it is by satellite.
Yep, and proud of it!
@Haseri- Yet everyone agrees the Bible has quite a bit of historical fact in it, so that makes no sense. Not everyone agrees that Darwin's book is fact.
I heard they found the remains of Noah's Ark somewhere in Turkey, and that the only way to see it is by satellite.