Extremely Slow Computer

I run a full fledged WinXP installation on my notebook with 192MB RAM ( it has 256MB, but 64 are reserved for the linux vm) with no problems. Rather than installing a version of XP that has been tampered with, i'd go looking for lightweight applications (assuming you can't upgrade the RAM, which would obviously be the best course of action).
 
so the easy way, and most efficient way is microxp. Its still mircro$oft, but not that bloated, when the linux alternatives typically already swallow ~70 megs of ram on xorg alone, let alone all other services

It's also pirated, and barely better than stock XP, excepting all the missing features.

70MB RAM is worth less than a dollar anyway, just pony up and get a reasonable amount of memory.
 
just pony up and get a reasonable amount of memory.
MicroXP was made with gaming in mind. Take for example the removal of Autoplay. This function polls the optical drives each second to see whether there is a disc in there. I used to explicitly notice this in the w95 days. Even though it's not as noticeable now, you know how exclusive these drives like to be...they're still able to hang a system. They can upset the fluidity of a game.
 
MicroXP was made with gaming in mind. Take for example the removal of Autoplay. This function polls the optical drives each second to see whether there is a disc in there. I used to explicitly notice this in the w95 days. Even though it's not as noticeable now, you know how exclusive these drives like to be...they're still able to hang a system. They can upset the fluidity of a game.

Anything the OS does with the CPU is going to have a negligable effect on games. Unless something is wrong, you're never going to see more than a ~1 fps difference due to CPU utilization (or lack thereof) by the OS.
 
I'm fine with the CPU and RAM issues that you and Perfection have raised. What concerns me about Autoplay is the drive polling, which appears to be synchronous and at kernal level.
 
Anything the OS does with the CPU is going to have a negligable effect on games. Unless something is wrong, you're never going to see more than a ~1 fps difference due to CPU utilization (or lack thereof) by the OS.

I know its not games, but I notice that if the CPU load is high on my computer (e.g. Xmarks does it when syncing my bookmarks), online flash video fps slows down greatly.
 
I know its not games, but I notice that if the CPU load is high on my computer (e.g. Xmarks does it when syncing my bookmarks), online flash video fps slows down greatly.

Thats not the OS using CPU resources. The only real CPU hog on my machine is svchost.exe which only acts up if I have a BSOD
 
You could as easily walk into a shop with your box in your hands and ask them which memory you need. While you're there, it shouldn't take them long to pop it in for you while you wait if they're not swamped although you could do it yourself with a little help from this forum.
 
I'm afraid I'm not exactly computer-literate, so I don't know what a motherboard is. Could you please explain.

Well, if you open up your case, it's usually the huge circuit board on one side. Basically where you plug everything in to communicate with each other. The way I see it, if the CPU is the brain, the mobo is the heart. :)

http://computer.howstuffworks.com/motherboard.htm

lots of modern mobos have integrated/on-board video/sound/networking, while in the past you had to get seperate cards. Although IMHO on-board tends to be crummy for intensive computing.
 
Back
Top Bottom