Marla_Singer
United in diversity
I'm actually not sure about this. Lyon's municipality has only 400,000 inhabitants and it's on the list. Its metro area is of 1.5 million people.Sorry, this is largest CITIES, not metropolitan areas.
I'm actually not sure about this. Lyon's municipality has only 400,000 inhabitants and it's on the list. Its metro area is of 1.5 million people.Sorry, this is largest CITIES, not metropolitan areas.
Afaict about the original list, the compilers weren't 100% consistent about it. Most cities are listed by central city size, but some got the figure for the entire urban area listed, like Lyon.I'm actually not sure about this. Lyon's municipality has only 400,000 inhabitants and it's on the list. Its metro area is of 1.5 million people.
I have lived in London for 18 years, and would not want to live long term anywhere else in Europe.
Yeah. München's a terrible city, but goddammit, it's my terrible city.I suppose this poll is being skewed by Americans confused as to where to place their patriotism in a poll where they have no options?
Yeah. München's a terrible city, but goddammit, it's my terrible city.
Sounds positively weird to me. Regarding organisation, in my experience London is an utter mess compared to Paris. Language barriers?I'm embarrassed to say that I've only been to London and Paris. As a northerner I am genetically predisposed to irrationally dislike London, but compared to Paris it is a fairly organised city, and its cultural draws are at least as strong. I wouldn't leave Osaka for either of them, but Paris would drive me insane in very short order, so I'll go for London.
Interesting to see London getting all the attention of this thread. Economically and demographically speaking, both Paris and London have about the same weight in the EU. However, Paris is totally forgotten here.
This tends to prove how Paris got distanced in the recent years. Paris is passionately hated by French people, and more and more ignored by the rest of the world.
On the other side, London is loved and promoted by everyone in the UK, and it catched the attention of the rest of the world as the economical capital of the EU. This trend is probably fueled by the image of London as a flourishing city. And this perceived prosperity of London could be explained by the fact it's a financial capital in a global economy more and more dominated by the financial sector. We could also add the fact it's an English speaking city, which makes it a lot more accessible to the rest of the world.
Overall, Paris should really reconsider itself. Paris should stop thinking itself at a national level and assumes itself at the global level. No matter if we like it or not, Paris is the undisputable capital of the French speaking world. It's not just a French city anymore. Furthermore, the old limited adminstrative borders of the city gives a very restricted image of what is "Paris" (an old and dirty city center which doesn't evolve), I think Parisians should really call fastly for the creation of a Greater Paris which would clearly help the city to eventually deal with its own problem at the right scale.
To illustrate my post, here's an image of modern Paris. No one knows it exists, and this for a good reason, it's not "inside Paris" but in what is wrongly called "suburbs". Suburbs are just the 20th century extensions of the city of Paris. They are its modern face. And the fact it is labelled "suburbs" makes it all ignored.
![]()
What did you think of my lovely hometown? (If you can remember much)