Originally posted by stonecoldt
Hi, Marla. Great map! I played a huge game last week as the English and had a lot of fun.
Well I did say I'd report back on my experience of the latest version, so it seems somewhat fitting to mention it here considering I too played the English. This was actually my first game playing with the Monarcy difficulty level. (Please don't laugh!) My rivals were: France, Germany, Russia, China, India, Egypt, Persia, Iroquois, Japan, Aztecs and the Zulus.
I "fixed the starting locations" of the Civilizations, and I quickly established London, then Plymouth to the South-West and Glasgow up in Scotland. I eventually crossed over into Ireland and founded Donegal in the north (my mate's girlfriend comes from there, you see) and Kilarny to the South-West.
Moving over to continental Europe I built Brittany in Brittany, and Amsterdam in The Netherlands (darn Russians took both eventually, though my culture grabbed Brittany back - much to my delight).
I had a very slow start, and it was really hard to spread. I did colonise Iceland eventually, but was trying to focus on re-establishing my own personal homeland of New Zealand as an English colony. Perhaps starting Sydney in Australia on the way. But as fate had it I had to make a hard choice to avoid Australasia completely. It would have been quite a challenge and I felt disheartened after losing a galley in the Indian ocean.
I settled for a few colonies in North-West Africa (Casablanca, and the off-shore Port Rosary). And finally south of the Amazon in South America I founded Port Elizabeth, which I intended to be the eventual location of my Forbidden palace - so I could support a "New England" in Eastern South America.
I was rather successful in doing that too. Founding the further cities in these South American Colonies including Montrose, Beaufort, Royale, Murchison and many others. You must have noticed I like putting a bit of effort into the names of my cities!
Yeah, the AI did settle greenland but it didn't matter, none of those cities really amounted to anything. I was able to settle Australia, and parts of S. America, and N. Africa.
Congratulations! Maybe I should try again. Actually, I haven't finished this game. By the 1400's, though my turns took me about 20 seconds to execute, the rival civs take at least 5 minutes, maybe even ten to do theres. And I just don't have quite enough patience to see this game mature into Modern day.
I recommend the English for an interesting worldwide naval game. The Chinese and Indians were my principal enemy. By the way, I think starting close to Europe is a big advantage because you can trade with all the other civs.
Yes the game has got to the point where I'm starting to dominate the Atlantic with Ironclads, so I can see it could get very interesting in the naval respect. I kinda agree about the "trading in Europe" point, but actually it seemed every other Civ seemed to be much more agreeable about swapping techs with each other, than they were with me. I had a rather good run of trading luck though after I established contact with the Iroquois. I sold contact with them, the Aztecs and the world maps I got from them both to my Eurasian Civ counterparts for a veritable fortune at the time - finally catching up with them all and giving me the big boost I needed for my South American expansion. I love that trading aspect - thank you Firaxis!
My main rivals were Russia, and Japan. Japan invaded Iceland, in an almost conceivable adventurous-Eskimo style (of course, I got it back!) The Russians just grumbled a lot, and swallowed my lovely Amsterdam, much to my annoyance. I wanted my civs to have "coffeehouses" (and tulips!) too!
I think (unless a Middle Earth map appears) I might try playing this map again, but with fewer rival civs. Maybe the lag won't be so bad like that. Maybe I could try random locations too. If you've got that "historically connected civs start together" option checked (or whatever it is called) then it could be quite interesting indeed. It would be like embracing a new Earth, without completely disregarding the history of our own version of Earth. I like trying to link it in more with our own histories.
Marla, I agree with the idea of limiting growth in Greenland. It just doesn't look right. Even if they do try and make it nicer looking by planting forests!
Oh and, I haven't mentioned this yet (I think?) but I really appreciate the effort you've made with New Zealand. I haven't had first hand experience of establishing any cities on it yet though, but it does look "about right" and I haven't noticed anything that makes me want to make any suggestions (yet!) But, for sure - thank you for making a good go of it.
Ash