It's sad if you've gone see clubs you don't support but not the one you do. My condolences btw.
So, how do these franchises work in football? Most other football leagues wouldn't even consider it.
That's 'cos people in the US are used to having cheerleaders and having music played so they can sing along.Well, I was supporting Reading just for the day.Some friends who live in Reading took us to the game, so it was fun. I got into it a lot. Yelling, cheering, the whole bit. It was great. Too bad the atmosphere for the MLS games aren't really the same, AFAIK.
The condolences are for the demise of your title hopesVerarde said:and thanks.![]()
I like the equalisation (how do drafts work?) but no promotion and relegation makes it impossible to have the amount of teams you have elsewhere.Pretty similar to US sports or to Rugby League in the UK.
Soccer works like other sports here, except it's appallingly run and has pretty severe delusions about its popularity. I assume the American soccer league has a similar set up to here, as well.
The peak professional league of each of Australia's four major codes of football (Aussie Rules, Rugby League, Rugby Union and Soccer) has one league and the same teams fielded from year to year. Occasionally there's expansion, with new clubs being set up in new areas (Gold Coast United were an A-League expansion club and I'm hoping they bring in Canberra to replace Newcastle next year).
The big difference is there's no promotion or relegation, and a lot of equalisation in terms of drafts, salary caps and restricitions on player movements which ensure every club has the chance of occasionally winning the whole thing.
<snip>
Together with the salary cap it ensures evenness and a degree of cyclicalness in the competition - in theory no club is further than say 8 years away from potentially winning a premiership. In practice, basket case clubs like the Melbourne Demons fail consistently through their own internal issues.
I don't think the A-League uses a draft, however. It'd be a lot less practical in a sport played in many countries where you're not a major player.
You could be right about the "let's blame Balotelli" slant, but it is quite a cynical way to look at Mancini's behaviour. I prefer to believe that Mancini has continued to trust Balotelli's ability will win out over his temperament, and is now running out of patience (actually, it might be the rest of the team have run out of patience and made that clear to Mancini). If the manager is trying to encourage a focus on one player to distract attention from his own shortcomings, that would be pretty contemptible.
I don't see why they let Tevez come back as Mancini had said he would never play again so to backtrack must have surely hurt his authority with the rest of the players even if some wanted him to be allowed to come back.
Also the comments after the match report make a fair point about how the Guardian have had a million crisis articles aboout Liverpool, Man City and Arsenal but none about Spurs yet. Presumably because they are trying to avoid criticising the next England manager until he gets appointed. To go along with the Tevez thing I'm still not sure how Redknapp got off the tax evasion case.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/apr/09/tottenham-hotspur-norwich-city-premier-league
Yeah, it's just simply not practical to have promotion/relegation in a continent the size of Europe with 20 million people playing four different types of football.
The AFL drafts works like this:
Talented kids nominate at the age of 17 (or later) and then there's a draft night at the end of the year. Selections are assigned in reverse order to how clubs fared, with the team who finished last getting the first pick, and the team who won the Grand Final getting pick #16 or #18 or whatever. Then they go back to the first side and cycle through again, until everyone's had enough picks.
Teams' lists are restricted (42 senior players) and the only ways to get players onto your list are to either draft them, trade with other clubs, or occasionally nab a speculative player from another sport playing overseas (so far, basketballers and Gaelic Footballers). So the draft ensures the talented players all funnel through this fair process rather than being bought by the richest clubs.
Together with the salary cap it ensures evenness and a degree of cyclicalness in the competition - in theory no club is further than say 8 years away from potentially winning a premiership. In practice, basket case clubs like the Melbourne Demons fail consistently through their own internal issues.
I don't think the A-League uses a draft, however. It'd be a lot less practical in a sport played in many countries where you're not a major player.
Do you think 'Arry will be coaching England in Euro 2012 or just taking over at a later stage? If I was an England fan I'd be hoping that, at least, he wouldn't be there for the Euro. Normally a new coach inspires a spike of enthusiasm that can last for 4 or 5 games, but not sure about one that comes in right after having lead a team to implosion...
Well, I was supporting Reading just for the day.Some friends who live in Reading took us to the game, so it was fun. I got into it a lot. Yelling, cheering, the whole bit. It was great. Too bad the atmosphere for the MLS games aren't really the same, AFAIK.
42 players? That's way too much, a couple dozen suffice.Yeah, it's just simply not practical to have promotion/relegation in a continent the size of Europe with 20 million people playing four different types of football.
The AFL drafts works like this:
Talented kids nominate at the age of 17 (or later) and then there's a draft night at the end of the year. Selections are assigned in reverse order to how clubs fared, with the team who finished last getting the first pick, and the team who won the Grand Final getting pick #16 or #18 or whatever. Then they go back to the first side and cycle through again, until everyone's had enough picks.
Teams' lists are restricted (42 senior players) and the only ways to get players onto your list are to either draft them, trade with other clubs, or occasionally nab a speculative player from another sport playing overseas (so far, basketballers and Gaelic Footballers). So the draft ensures the talented players all funnel through this fair process rather than being bought by the richest clubs.
Together with the salary cap it ensures evenness and a degree of cyclicalness in the competition - in theory no club is further than say 8 years away from potentially winning a premiership. In practice, basket case clubs like the Melbourne Demons fail consistently through their own internal issues.
I don't think the A-League uses a draft, however. It'd be a lot less practical in a sport played in many countries where you're not a major player.
Keep that healthy footballing attitude Lambert!I still don't like al-Citeh, though![]()
Convincingly? WHAT? I saw them, Blackburn could have destroyed them at points, Liverpool defends horribly and their goalkeeper saved them from an Andy Carroll own goal which would have made goal of the season through sheer silliness.Liverpool win. Convincingly. Against Blackburn. Who is their 3rd keeper?
Liverpool win. Convincingly. Against Blackburn. Who is their 3rd keeper?
brad jones, apparantly hes pretty awful
was thinking everton would win at the weekend anyway, but now surely a certainty
Hey, good for you. I had mistakenly sized you up as the sort of guy who was "passionate" about soccer from a distance, but wouldn't have bothered actually going to a real game if you were over in Europe. I was obviously quite wrong about that, and my apologies for mistakenly judging you so.
I still don't like al-Citeh, though![]()