One World Trade Center is ok. Freedom Tower was abominable.
I despise calling anything 1 **** plaza, center, tower, whatever. It's pretentious, arrogant, and stinks of the lowest level of marketing hackery.
One World Trade Center is ok. Freedom Tower was abominable.
Ugly modernist refrigerator boxes? They were already some of the most imposingly unattractive buildings on the planet, I'm not sure we need to resurrect that horrible aesthetic.I still think they should have put back something that looked exactly like what was destroyed.
Sounds good, though I don't really care their much.Thanks to the events of the past 7 years, the word "freedom" has lost much of its altruistic appeal to me and has gained a more sinister definition. Using the word freedom to help justify the deaths of a million Iraqi civilians is just one example of such perversion. Although I wish they could have come up with a more original and creative name, I am personally glad they took off the word "freedom".
Why? The WTC's were not particularly attractive (inside or out).I still think they should have put back something that looked exactly like what was destroyed.
Why? The WTC's were not particularly attractive (inside or out).
Right, because American invaded Iraq with the goal of killing a million Iraqis.
Actually, that connotation only exists because you made it.But anything would be better than freedom tower. That connotes it was destroyed by people "who hate our freedom", which is ludicrous.
It doesn't matter if somebody (perhaps, in your opinion, George Bush) abused freedom for something. Freedom remains a good thing.general_kill in the OP said:Thanks to the events of the past 7 years, the word "freedom" has lost much of its altruistic appeal to me and has gained a more sinister definition.
To reiterate what I originally stated, we used "freedom" to help justify their deaths. I do not believe, as you are insinuating, that we invaded purely to kill Iraqis.
Amen to that. The best way to thumb our collective noses at Al Qaeda would be to put the same damn towers right back up again in the same damn places and give them the same damn name.Couldn't they just recreate the damned Twin Towers? It may invoke some painful memories, but we already have them and are already outraged that we still don't really have a proper memorial.
It should be pointed out that the American military always goes out of its way to avoid killing innocent bystanders--that's why we use smart bombs in crowded areas instead of cheap unguided Mark 82's.Okay, but you're misunderstanding the cause-and-effect relationship here. We didn't kill a bunch of Iraqis and then try to justify it with the word "freedom." That's nutso conspiracy stuff right there. We invaded Iraq (in the process killing some Iraqis) IN ORDER TO free Iraq.
It doesn't matter if somebody (perhaps, in your opinion, George Bush) abused freedom for something. Freedom remains a good thing.
Eminently true--and applicable to both George Bush AND Barack Obama.Yes, but not the sort of "Freedom" the gubbamint would have you aspiring towards.
One World Trace Center is a kind of pompous name too, depending on how you read it.
Being stubborn & not evolving is their racket not ours.They knock it down, it goes right back up.
Okay, but you're misunderstanding the cause-and-effect relationship here. We didn't kill a bunch of Iraqis and then try to justify it with the word "freedom." That's nutso conspiracy stuff right there. We invaded Iraq (in the process killing some Iraqis) IN ORDER TO free Iraq.
I despise calling anything 1 **** plaza, center, tower, whatever. It's pretentious, arrogant, and stinks of the lowest level of marketing hackery.
I think I would prefer creating a park on the sight of the towers, perhaps will pools marking the spot where the towers once stood.
We need to conquer the rest of the planet so that the tower's name makes sense.
The only thing that changes is which ones. That's what I like about the U.S. government--it flip-flops often enough that neither side can significantly advance their agenda.