Freedom Tower No More!

One World Trade Center is ok. Freedom Tower was abominable.

I despise calling anything 1 **** plaza, center, tower, whatever. It's pretentious, arrogant, and stinks of the lowest level of marketing hackery.
 
I still think they should have put back something that looked exactly like what was destroyed.
Ugly modernist refrigerator boxes? They were already some of the most imposingly unattractive buildings on the planet, I'm not sure we need to resurrect that horrible aesthetic.
 
Thanks to the events of the past 7 years, the word "freedom" has lost much of its altruistic appeal to me and has gained a more sinister definition. Using the word freedom to help justify the deaths of a million Iraqi civilians is just one example of such perversion. Although I wish they could have come up with a more original and creative name, I am personally glad they took off the word "freedom".
Sounds good, though I don't really care their much.

I still think they should have put back something that looked exactly like what was destroyed.
Why? The WTC's were not particularly attractive (inside or out).
 
Right, because American invaded Iraq with the goal of killing a million Iraqis.

To reiterate what I originally stated, we used "freedom" to help justify their deaths. I do not believe, as you are insinuating, that we invaded purely to kill Iraqis.
 
But anything would be better than freedom tower. That connotes it was destroyed by people "who hate our freedom", which is ludicrous.
Actually, that connotation only exists because you made it.

You don't see anybody saying we should rename the Statue of Liberty.

If anything should be considered creepy, it's the things being said by people like you and GK:
general_kill in the OP said:
Thanks to the events of the past 7 years, the word "freedom" has lost much of its altruistic appeal to me and has gained a more sinister definition.
It doesn't matter if somebody (perhaps, in your opinion, George Bush) abused freedom for something. Freedom remains a good thing.
 
To reiterate what I originally stated, we used "freedom" to help justify their deaths. I do not believe, as you are insinuating, that we invaded purely to kill Iraqis.

Okay, but you're misunderstanding the cause-and-effect relationship here. We didn't kill a bunch of Iraqis and then try to justify it with the word "freedom." That's nutso conspiracy stuff right there. We invaded Iraq (in the process killing some Iraqis) IN ORDER TO free Iraq.
 
Couldn't they just recreate the damned Twin Towers? It may invoke some painful memories, but we already have them and are already outraged that we still don't really have a proper memorial.
Amen to that. The best way to thumb our collective noses at Al Qaeda would be to put the same damn towers right back up again in the same damn places and give them the same damn name.
 
Okay, but you're misunderstanding the cause-and-effect relationship here. We didn't kill a bunch of Iraqis and then try to justify it with the word "freedom." That's nutso conspiracy stuff right there. We invaded Iraq (in the process killing some Iraqis) IN ORDER TO free Iraq.
It should be pointed out that the American military always goes out of its way to avoid killing innocent bystanders--that's why we use smart bombs in crowded areas instead of cheap unguided Mark 82's.

We didn't use the word "freedom" in order to kill Iraqis. We used it in order to get at the bad ones such as Saddam while killing as few innocent Iraqis as possible.
 
It doesn't matter if somebody (perhaps, in your opinion, George Bush) abused freedom for something. Freedom remains a good thing.

Yes, but not the sort of "Freedom" the gubbamint would have you aspiring towards.
 
I think I would prefer creating a park on the sight of the towers, perhaps will pools marking the spot where the towers once stood.
 
Yes, but not the sort of "Freedom" the gubbamint would have you aspiring towards.
Eminently true--and applicable to both George Bush AND Barack Obama.

WHOA, wait, calm down a second. Here's the point. Right now, Obama is planning to take away our property rights and 2nd Amendment rights, among others. No matter which party is running the White House, one or another of our rights is in jeopardy.

The only thing that changes is which ones. That's what I like about the U.S. government--it flip-flops often enough that neither side can significantly advance their agenda.
 
They knock it down, it goes right back up.
Being stubborn & not evolving is their racket not ours.

Okay, but you're misunderstanding the cause-and-effect relationship here. We didn't kill a bunch of Iraqis and then try to justify it with the word "freedom." That's nutso conspiracy stuff right there. We invaded Iraq (in the process killing some Iraqis) IN ORDER TO free Iraq.
:lol:

You're not serious, right? :scared:
 
I think I would prefer creating a park on the sight of the towers, perhaps will pools marking the spot where the towers once stood.

Thats so low key it borders on being unamerican.

It should be as garish, loud and offenesive to the senses as possible. That'd show those terrorists.
 
Back
Top Bottom