General Politics Three: But what is left/right?

Status
Not open for further replies.

SB4: Judge blocks Texas' controversial border law​

A US federal judge has blocked Texas from implementing SB4, a controversial law that would make border crossings illegal and punishable with jail time.

If implemented, the law will become one of the toughest immigration laws passed by any US state in modern history.

But rights groups and the federal government have sued to stop it.

The state's governor says he will appeal. He is accompanying Donald Trump on a border visit on Thursday, while President Joe Biden makes his own trip.

Governor Greg Abbott said his state would not "back down in our fight to protect our state - and our nation - from President Biden's border crisis".

Mr Abbott has previously alluded to a "tidal wave" of illegal entry into his state. More than 6.3 million migrants have been detained crossing into the US illegally under President Biden - higher than was seen under previous presidencies - though reasons for the spike are complex with some factors pre-dating Mr Biden's time in office.

The proposed law would allow local and state police officers to stop and arrest anyone suspected of having crossed the border illegally, except in schools and hospitals.

Punishments range from misdemeanours to felonies that can lead to jail time or fines of up to $2,000 (£1,580). Penalties for illegal re-entry could go up to 20 years in jail, depending on a person's immigration and criminal history.

The law was set to come into effect on 5 March.

But a legal challenge was mounted by the American Civil Liberties Union and the US Department of Justice - which argues that the legislation would conflict with its own powers.

In an 114-page order published on Thursday, US district judge David Ezra granted a request for an injunction that temporarily prevents Texas from implementing the law.

In his order, Judge Ezra said that legal precedent affirms that "states may not exercise immigration enforcement power except as authorized by the federal government" and that SB4 "conflicts with key provisions of federal immigration law, to the detriment of the United States' foreign relations and treaty obligations".

Additionally, the judge rejected Texas' claim that the state has authority to repel an "invasion" of the territory, saying that "surges in immigration do not constitute an 'invasion' within the meaning of the Constitution."

"[To] allow Texas to permanently supersede federal directives on the basis of an invasion would amount to nullification of federal law and authority — a notion that is antithetical to the Constitution and has been unequivocally rejected by federal courts since the civil war," Mr Ezra wrote.

The controversy of SB4 comes amid rising illegal migration and public concern over Mr Biden's handling of the border.

Both he and his likely contender in the November election, Donald Trump, are scheduled to visit separate border cities in Texas on Thursday.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68441657
 
Ok...
 
That’s like saying a knight isn’t necessarily aristocratic if he goes from being an unlanded sworn sword to a Baron.
I don't agree with the analogy. Retirement isn't anything like becoming a Baron. A knight isn't anything like a schoolteacher or an assembly line auto worker.
 
I don't follow that - you think they're going to prosecute Biden under that law?
One of the things that Republican supporters have done to support Trump is to take the things Trump has done, and treat them as though they are things that everyone does. So, if he's accused of insurrection, they'll start calling everything the left does an "insurrection." This is one driver of the move to impeach Biden. It's designed to give the impression that everyone does impeachable offenses, so it was no big deal back when Trump did it. So my sentences were trying to give two examples of this phenomenon, not to say that GA would prosecute Biden for insurrection.
 
Chad boiling over ahead of long-awaited elections

Heavy gunfire erupted in Chad’s capital N’Djamena on Wednesday, just hours after announcements of a long-awaited election date in the central African country.

The Chadian government said its security forces pushed back against members of the opposition Socialist Party Without Borders (PSF), who led an attack on state security forces early Wednesday after an altercation with a party member.

PSF leaders denied those accusations in Facebook posts, but local newspapers reported more gunfire and a possible bombing of the party’s headquarters later on Wednesday. Local authorities said Thursday that “dozens” of people had been wounded or killed. PSF leader Yaya Dillo was among those killed.

Internet services in the country remain cut since Wednesday, adding to the uncertainty.

Chad has long been in the grip of political tensions arising from shifting allegiances and familial and tribal relations within the political elite. Uncertainty following the death of longtime ruler Idriss Deby in 2021 and the installation of his son Mahamat as leader have escalated the problems.

2023-12-17T092852Z_1381029241_RC2WY4AZ7O55_RTRMADP_3_CHAD-REFERENDUM-1703593156.jpg
 

Brian Mulroney, one of Canada's most consequential prime ministers, is dead at 84​

Baie-Comeau, Quebec-born leader negotiated U.S. free trade deal, introduced GST

Brian Mulroney — who, as Canada's 18th prime minister, steered the country through a tumultuous period in national and world affairs but left office deeply unpopular — has died. He was 84.

His daughter Caroline Mulroney shared the news Thursday afternoon on social media.

"On behalf of my mother and our family, it is with great sadness we announce the passing of my father, The Right Honourable Brian Mulroney, Canada's 18th Prime Minister. He died peacefully, surrounded by family," she said on X, formerly Twitter.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said he was "devastated" to hear of Mulroney's passing.

"He never stopped working for Canadians, and he always sought to make this country an even better place to call home. I'll never forget the insights he shared with me over the years — he was generous, tireless, and incredibly passionate," he said in a statement on X.

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said Mulroney was one of Canada's "greatest ever statesmen."

"I will always be thankful for his candid advice and generous mentorship to me personally. All Canadians are grateful for his immense sacrifice and the lasting legacy he leaves us all," Poilievre said in a statement on X.

Mulroney was one of Canada's most controversial prime ministers. Unafraid to tackle the most challenging issues of his era, Mulroney pursued politics in a way that earned him devoted supporters — and equally passionate critics.

Mulroney was a gifted public speaker and a skilled politician. As prime minister, he brokered a free trade deal with the U.S. and pushed for constitutional reforms to secure Quebec's signature on Canada's supreme law — an effort that ultimately failed.

He introduced a national sales tax to raise funds against ballooning budget deficits, privatized some Crown corporations and stood strongly against racial apartheid in South Africa during one of the most eventful tenures of any Canadian prime minister.

"Whether one agrees with our solutions or not, none will accuse us of having chosen to evade our responsibilities by side-stepping the most controversial issues of our time," Mulroney said in his February 1993 resignation address.

"I've done the very best for my country and my party."

A fateful friendship​

Mulroney was born to working class Irish-Canadian parents in the forestry town of Baie-Comeau in 1939. His father was a paper mill electrician in this hardscrabble outpost in Quebec's northeast.

Mulroney grew up with a bicultural world view in an isolated community split between French and English speakers — an upbringing that would prove to be politically useful later.

Mulroney became interested in Conservative politics through a fateful friendship with Lowell Murray, a future senator and cabinet minister in his government. Murray convinced his charismatic classmate to join the Progressive Conservative campus club at St. Francis Xavier University in Antigonish, N.S.

A lawyer by training, Mulroney made a name for himself in his home province as an anti-corruption crusader. After violence erupted at the James Bay hydroelectric dam construction site, Mulroney was brought in to investigate Mafia ties as the lead member of the Cliche commission reviewing the bungled project.

Following a failed Progressive Conservative leadership bid in 1976, Mulroney took the reins of the party after organizing opposition to then-leader Joe Clark at the 1983 leadership convention. Mulroney — who had never previously held elected office — unseated the former prime minister from the leadership on the strength of his support among delegates from Quebec.

With the Liberals faltering in the polls, Mulroney led the PCs to a majority victory in the 1984 campaign — one of the largest election landslides in Canadian history. While Pierre Elliott Trudeau had been replaced by John Turner as Liberal leader by the time the 1984 campaign began, the election was widely seen as a referendum on Trudeau's sometimes turbulent time in office.

Mulroney would win again in 1988 after voters backed his plan to sign a free trade agreement with the U.S. — easily the most consequential policy of the Mulroney era.

'Irish Eyes are Smiling'​

Mulroney was elected to office in 1984 promising to "refurbish" the Canada-U.S. relationship after years of tension. He fended off claims from the Turner-led Liberal Party that a free trade deal with the U.S. would diminish Canada's sovereignty and turn the country into a ''51st state.''

During a widely watched televised leaders' debate in 1988, Turner accused Mulroney of selling out Canada. "You don't have a monopoly on patriotism — and I resent the fact, your implication that only you are a Canadian," Mulroney fired back.

Mulroney would be re-elected with another majority government — the first time a conservative prime minister had won two consecutive majorities since Sir John A. Macdonald.

Trade between the two countries grew dramatically after the free trade deal was ratified and the economies became even more intertwined after nearly 100 years of protectionism came to an end.

"Our message is clear here and around the world — Canada is open for business again," Mulroney said at the 1985 "Shamrock Summit" alongside U.S. President Ronald Reagan.

The two men, both of Irish extraction, famously sang lines from the folk song When Irish Eyes are Smiling at that Quebec City meeting. The musical interlude was celebrated by some as a sign of thawing relations between the two countries — and derided by others as a sign of Canada kowtowing to its powerful neighbour.

Mulroney improved Canada's relationship with the U.S and pushed Reagan to sign the acid rain treaty to curb sulfur dioxide emissions that were destroying waterways. He also signed a North American air defence modernization agreement to better protect the continent from a ballistic missile attack.

Former U.S. president George H.W. Bush considered Mulroney a close personal friend — Mulroney was Bush's last guest at Camp David, the presidential retreat — and often sought his counsel on Cold War-related matters as an alliance of western nations negotiated an end to the Soviet Union with Mikhail Gorbachev.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau would tap Mulroney's deep U.S. connections in 2017-18 as the NAFTA renegotiation efforts started to go sideways. Mulroney, who owned a home in Palm Beach, Fla. — not far from then-president Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago — was a useful intermediary between Trudeau's Liberal government and the Republican administration.

A delicate dance with Quebec and a failed accord​

During his time in federal politics, Mulroney assembled an electoral coalition of western populists, Quebec nationalists and traditional Tories — an alliance that succeeded in keeping the Liberals out of power for nearly 10 years.

Mulroney's first landslide majority win — the PCs captured 211 of 282 seats in the Commons in the 1984 vote — gave him the leeway to make fundamental reforms to the Canadian state. Under Mulroney's leadership, dozens of Crown corporations were sold to private interests, including Air Canada. He also scrapped Trudeau's much-maligned National Energy Program, a decision welcomed by many westerners.

That electoral coalition eventually would collapse after the emergence of the Bloc Québécois and the Reform Party — groups that capitalized on regional grievances that grew even more stark during Mulroney's time in office.

Mulroney — who stressed the importance of Quebec to a successful conservative movement during his party leadership bid — trounced his Liberal opponents in the province with a promise to bring Quebec onside with the Constitution.

In 1981-82, the separatist Quebec government led by René Lévesque and the Parti Québécois refused to sign Trudeau's repatriated Constitution Act, fearing the Charter of Rights and Freedoms would centralize power in Ottawa and dilute provincial influence.

In an attempt to heal those wounds, Mulroney brokered the 1987 Meech Lake constitutional accord with Quebec — then led by federalist Liberal Premier Robert Bourassa — and the other provinces. The accord would have recognized Quebec as a "distinct society" within Canada and would have extended greater powers to the provinces to nominate people for federal institutions like the Senate and the Supreme Court of Canada.

The accord also would have bolstered the provinces' role in the immigration system and made changes to how social programs were to be funded — allowing provinces to opt out of some programs and accept federal funding to create their own.

While initially popular with voters — many English Canadians believed this overture to Quebec would silence separatism and prevent a repeat of the 1980 sovereignty referendum — the deal crumbled after Trudeau emerged from retirement to oppose it. The former PM accused Mulroney of conceding too much to the provinces and argued the accord would "render the Canadian state totally impotent."

Many in English Canada also grew leery of recognizing Quebec as a "distinct society." Ultimately, the provinces failed to ratify the deal by its deadline, with Newfoundland and Labrador and Manitoba as notable holdouts.

"It's a sad day for Canada. This was all about Canada, about the unity of our country," Mulroney said of the accord's defeat.

Lucien Bouchard, Mulroney's Quebec lieutenant and a former colleague at the Cliche anti-corruption commission, angrily left the PC government after the accord failed and formed the Bloc, a party devoted to Quebec's interests. Bouchard, widely respected in Quebec, torpedoed Mulroney's support in that province.

Another Mulroney-led attempt at constitutional reform, the Charlottetown Accord of 1992, was later defeated in a national referendum.

A deeply unpopular tax​

Amid the constitutional fracas and after the introduction of the deeply unpopular Goods and Services Tax (GST), Mulroney's popularity declined dramatically. He posted record-low approval ratings at the end of his second term.

After negotiating the free trade deal with the U.S., Mulroney sought to reform the existing manufacturers' sales tax (MST) system that, he said, put Canada's exporters at a disadvantage.

That 13.5 per cent tax was largely invisible to the consumer, while the consumption-based GST that would replace it — a 7 per cent levy on all goods and services purchased in Canada — was to be paid directly at the cash register.

With the Queen's approval, Mulroney stacked the Senate with supporters to get the deeply unpopular bill through the Liberal-dominated upper house.

"It is clearly not popular, but we're doing it because it's right for Canada. It must be done," Mulroney said of the tax in 1990.

In the 1993 election campaign following Mulroney's departure from the federal scene, then Liberal leader Jean Chretien — hoping to capitalize on voter frustration — made "Axe the Tax" his campaign mantra.

Chretien easily beat Mulroney's successor, Kim Campbell, but never followed through on his promise to scrap the tax as it raked in billions of dollars in government revenue — money used to pay down Canada's substantial national debt.

"Quite frankly, it's interesting to me to sit back many years later, having had to endure the abuse and recriminations and the pounding, and to see that it's turned out well for Canada. That's all I wanted," Mulroney said in 2010.

A break with allies on apartheid​

While often associated with two other leading conservative figures of the era — Reagan and former British prime minister Margaret Thatcher — Mulroney broke ranks with some of his closest allies on one issue: apartheid and sanctions against the South African white minority regime.

Reagan and Thatcher were both vehemently anti-communist. They feared that South African black leaders like Nelson Mandela were Marxists intent on turning the country away from liberal democracy. Mulroney, who had long admired John Diefenbaker's anti-apartheid stance decades ago, saw the state's system of racist repression as fundamentally unjust.

After his election, Mulroney launched an aggressive Canadian push within the Commonwealth for sanctions to pressure the South African government to dismantle its racist caste system and release Mandela from prison, where he had been locked up for a quarter century.

Upon his release, Mandela spoke with Mulroney by phone to thank him for his advocacy.

"We regard you as one of our great friends because of the solid support we have received from you and Canada over the years," Mandela told Mulroney, according to the prime minister's book, Memoirs. "When I was in jail, having friends like you in Canada gave me more joy and support than I can say."
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/brian-mulroney-passes-away-1.7130287
 
Recently a state that has been using denial of food access as a weapon, shot and killed a bunch of people who were trying to obtain some food aid when it did arrive into the devastated region. Seems like a situation of general politics to me.

Moderator Action: Nice try but please do not bring the Israeli/Hama conflict into this thread. I expect such a thread will show up again. Birdjaguar
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mfw the pro-Russia poster also turns out to be pro-Trump
View attachment 685585
I am not pro either.... I am just not explicitly pro either... either. This often gets confused as being pro either because of binary thinking.

Liberals are at least mildly embarrassed enough about their own nations genocides to manage to accidentally omit them from the curriculum.
That's the thing though, it smacks of dishonesty. If you are truly sorry about something you won't hide that you did it.
 
I am not pro either.... I am just not explicitly pro either... either. This often gets confused as being pro either because of binary thinking.


That's the thing though, it smacks of dishonesty. If you are truly sorry about something you won't hide that you did it.
Please understand you are arguing from a logical and "common sense" standpoint, which is actually incompatible with the moronic dialectic that you are trying to argue against. Don't worry though, after the "times of trouble", we will all like each other and cooperate fully with each other. 🙄
 
How an EU-funded security force helped Senegal crush democracy protests

The Senegalese government deployed a special counterterrorism unit, created, equipped, and trained with funding from the European Union, to violently suppress recent pro-democracy protests, a joint investigation between Al Jazeera and porCausa Foundation reveals.

Since 2021, the trial of popular and controversial opposition leader Ousmane Sonko has led to demonstrations across the West African nation, in which dozens have been killed. Al Jazeera and porCausa obtained visual evidence, Spanish government contracts, a confidential evaluation report, and testimonies from multiple sources suggesting that the EU-funded Rapid Action Surveillance and Intervention Group, also known as GAR-SI, was used to violently crush those protests.

In one video, security personnel in the same type of armoured vehicles the EU bought for GAR-SI Senegal are seen firing tear gas at a protest caravan organised by Sonko last May. Al Jazeera verified that the incident happened in the southern Senegalese village of Mampatim, about 50km (31 miles) from Kolda, in the Casamance region.

The EU-funded elite units were instead meant to be based in Senegal’s border areas with Mali to fight cross-border crime.


Spoiler Same vehicles earlier :
ghyikgfcdiktgfvbn-1709192797.jpeg
Irene Mingasson, ambassador for the EU in Senegal, with Sidiki Kaba, Senegal’s minister of the armed forces, at a GAR-SI barrack in Kidira, Senegal in October 2019


Spoiler It looks like Judge Dread provided their other cars :
2023-07-31T173047Z_941019227_RC2CE2AEM1U5_RTRMADP_3_SENEGAL-POLITICS-1691004092.jpg
 
Last edited:
Iranians vote in legislative, key assembly polls amid economic concerns

Iranians are voting for a new parliament in an election marred by frustration over economic woes and restrictions on political and social freedoms.

The election on Friday is the first formal measure of public opinion since anti-government protests in 2022-2023 spiralled into some of the worst political turmoil since the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

Iranian officials and even Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei urged the public to cast ballots, but polling stations in the country’s capital, Tehran, appeared to have few voters.

Authorities have largely barred politicians calling for any change within the country’s theocracy, known broadly as reformists, from running in the election – leaving mostly only a broad slate of conservative or hardline figures.

About 15,000 candidates are vying for seats in the 290-member parliament, formally known as the Islamic Consultative Assembly. Out of them, only 116 are considered to be relatively moderate or pro-reform candidates. Those demanding radical changes are banned or did not bother to register given widespread disqualifications by authorities.

Experts expected a low turnout, with official surveys suggesting only about 41 percent of eligible Iranians would vote.

Turnout hit a record low of 42.5 percent in the 2020 parliamentary election, while about 62 percent of voters participated in 2016. [The UK managed 39.7% in electing curious George]

Iranians also voted on the 88-member Assembly of Experts, for which there are 144 contenders, all senior members of the country’s powerful clergy.

“The Assembly of Experts is the body that appoints and supervises the supreme leader, who has the final say on all major political, religious and security matters,” he told Al Jazeera, pointing out that Khamenei has been in power since 1989.

“There is widespread speculation that he may not live to see the end of the next assembly’s eight-year term, which means that the members elected on Friday could have the responsibility of choosing his successor,” Toossi said.
 
Please understand you are arguing from a logical and "common sense" standpoint, which is actually incompatible with the moronic dialectic that you are trying to argue against. Don't worry though, after the "times of trouble", we will all like each other and cooperate fully with each other. 🙄
Actually given the current "and a wild crisis appears" whenever the previous one starts losing steam pattern.... i doubt it will be over at least till WW3 exhausts everyone too much to still keep fighting.
 
Congratulations to those who want to undo a half-century of progress in the U.S. and return us to the halcyon days of yore. Your [stink] is working. :rolleyes:


NPR said:
The turnout gap between white and nonwhite voters in the U.S. is growing fastest in jurisdictions that were stripped of a federal civil rights-era voting protection a decade ago, according to a new study.
NPR said:
In 2013, the Supreme Court effectively gutted Section 5 in Shelby County v. Holder — clearing the way for states to pass laws for measures like redistricting, changing poll locations and adding restrictive voter ID requirements without federal review. A new study by the Brennan Center for Justice, a think tank that advocates for expanded voting access, measured the impact of the Shelby County decision between 2012 and 2022.
NPR said:
And across the U.S., the turnout gap between white and nonwhite voters is increasing for various reasons. But the think tank found that the turnout gap was growing faster in places formerly covered under Section 5 and that it was growing fastest between white and Black voters in those areas.
NPR said:
According to the Brennan Center, states formerly covered in whole or in part under Section 5 have passed at least 29 laws that have made voting more difficult in the past decade. Crayton adds that it is also difficult to track all the changes made to voting laws at the state and local levels because officials are no longer required to submit those changes to the federal government.
NPR said:
"It may not seem like a lot in terms of a percentage number, but that number represents hundreds of thousands of voters over time that are not part of our political process because those votes weren't cast," Crayton says. According to the study, the effect of the Shelby County decision continues to widen the turnout gap. The turnout gap between formerly covered and noncovered areas was larger in 2022 than in any election since the ruling, researchers said.
 
All part of reestablishing permanent rule by the dominant ethnic group. I would be surprised if the gap was less than 5 percentage points of vote share between contemporary US election results and a hypothetical system where everyone else had it as easy and convenient to enrol and cast ballots as white suburban people do.

Proper universal suffrage in the US really only lasted from what, 1965 to about 2011?
 
All part of reestablishing permanent rule by the dominant ethnic group. Proper universal suffrage in the US really only lasted from what, 1965 to about 2011?
Did we even get there?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom