Yes, it's a useful observation to point out that it that could lead to a conflict of interest, similar to how some unions have incentive to foment conflict with management.
I don't think it's accurate to say that the corruption has happened yet. Even though it certainly could in the future.
The last riots were the overwhelming response due to disgust with the status quo. The corporate board trying to get ahead of the mob when it comes to social change will behave in ways that are indistinguishable from the corporate board that feels like it's paying protection money.
By conflating donations with shake down, you're running the risk of disempowering the movement. Any entity that is donating because they want to help is at risk of having their effort spun as fearful bribery. We are already cynical enough to assume they are chasing woke dollars. But the protests that BLM is encouraging is of much larger scale than the property damage
I wonder how much this mirrors my point, that Trump arranged for pay raises for the military before he started asking them to do illegal things
I don't think it's accurate to say that the corruption has happened yet. Even though it certainly could in the future.
The last riots were the overwhelming response due to disgust with the status quo. The corporate board trying to get ahead of the mob when it comes to social change will behave in ways that are indistinguishable from the corporate board that feels like it's paying protection money.
By conflating donations with shake down, you're running the risk of disempowering the movement. Any entity that is donating because they want to help is at risk of having their effort spun as fearful bribery. We are already cynical enough to assume they are chasing woke dollars. But the protests that BLM is encouraging is of much larger scale than the property damage
I wonder how much this mirrors my point, that Trump arranged for pay raises for the military before he started asking them to do illegal things