Estebonrober
Deity
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2017
- Messages
- 6,062
noWhen it is clear the criminals are using the protesters as cover, is there no obligation on the protesters to remove that cover?
noWhen it is clear the criminals are using the protesters as cover, is there no obligation on the protesters to remove that cover?
Not necessarily. Non-violence works when there's is an implied credible threat of violence if it doesn't. IMHO, Malcolm X enabled MLK Jr.
Read the 1st and 2nd amendments together as a paragraph instead of separately. The right of assembly and the right to petition govt for grievences flows right of the people to bear arms.
I think you should reread that post.Black people have been shot to death for holding toy guns. Don't give me this disengenuous answer, we both know the right to bear arms does not apply equally to various groups.
You seriously think a black man could walk around with an ar 15 and not get armed police trying to kill him?
That is not what I said and frankly I'm a little insulted that you would imply that is what I meant."Look, there was a black owned business! If more of those lazy layabouts would just pull themselves up by their bootstraps the police wouldn't be killing them, so it's all their own fault!"
That is not what I said and frankly I'm a little insulted that you would imply that is what I meant.
This wasn't the case for a number of people on social media, which can be Google'd and timestamped. Of course, this could be a carrier thing, but that's a rather specific reason for a severe failure in communication when the police were already instigating violence.I was gettings texts about a curfew being in place starting 8 pm at around noon.
@Timsup2nothin I mean, I have been on protests with regards to the police (it was the St Paul police after Castille, not Minneapolis) and have posted repeatedly when the topic comes up about the importance of police reform and, when relevant, that Minneapolis Police have problems.
Black people have been shot to death for holding toy guns. Don't give me this disengenuous answer, we both know the right to bear arms does not apply equally to various groups.
You seriously think a black man could walk around with an ar 15 and not get armed police trying to kill him?

Did those protests accomplish anything?
Maybe you should have started some fires.
Burning down local community owned businesses -and not predatory businesses like cheap liquor stores or payday loans- in no way "sticks it to the man" or has any meaningful impact on the situation beyond prolonging pointless violence. What symbolism is there in burning down a local barbershop? Somehow that will teach the MPD to not be terrible?Oh.
What was your point then?
I've seen those posts too. A twitter picture is not proof one way or the other. All that can be said is that people, particularly during the night, are using the cover provided by the protesters to burn buildings in the community.Gorbles said:To your bit about the barbershop, I saw that on Twitter as well. That's when a lot of the activist groups started clocking that people who weren't protestors were starting fires and causing property damage. I recommend reading up on it, so that you don't blame the wrong group for others' acts.
So let me get this straight. You're willing to believe that the implementation of an executive order with no time given was carried out flawlessly, but you're also unwilling to take direct timestamped tweets from people in the area (presumably as you are), in the crowds, on the streets?@Gorbles
https://mn.gov/governor/news/?id=1055-434117
Governor signed executive order establishing 8pm curfew on Friday. The post doesn't give the date, but there would have been at least 24 hours notice before the 8pm Saturday curfew came into effect.
I've seen those posts too. A twitter picture is not proof one way or the other. All that can be said is that people, particularly during the night, are using the cover provided by the protesters to burn buildings in the community.
With regards to the curfew, what should the governor have done after a week of nightime violence that attracted worldwide attention? Do nothing?
The executive order announcing there would be a curfew from 8pm to 6am on Friday and Saturday was signed on Friday and widely publicized in local media.So let me get this straight. You're willing to believe that the implementation of an executive order with no time given was carried out flawlessly, but you're also unwilling to take direct timestamped tweets from people in the area (presumably as you are), in the crowds, on the streets?
So . . . none of that is at all a rebuttal of what I posted, assuming we're talking about the Friday night?The executive order announcing there would be a curfew from 8pm to 6am on Friday and Saturday was signed on Friday and widely publicized in local media.
The city of Minneapolis published on Friday an announcement of the curfew from 8pm to 6am on Friday and Saturday. I don't know when on Friday the announcement was made, but the knowledge that there would be a Saturday curfew had been out for over 24 hours.
http://www.minneapolismn.gov/www/gr...s2Kexa2KXarvHBFYfsjXJKQfdiORwCr2VWYGzq9dzvUUA
Local press was publishing information about the Saturday curfew by at least 6 am on Saturday itself.
https://www.startribune.com/suburbs...g-curfews-starting-at-8-p-m-friday/570873142/
Both days, but primarily Saturday.So . . . none of that is at all a rebuttal of what I posted, assuming we're talking about the Friday night?