I agree that it's not the prisoners Hamas wanted. They wanted to show they can get Israel to do what they want. That they likely won't get their ultimate goal is is apparent to them, but not to the majority of Palestinians whose support they rely on.These people aren't what Hamas wants, they mean next to nothing to it, some of them were literally sent on suicide missions, they are merely pawns in the greater game. Hamas wants a free Palestine, and by Palestine they mean Israel, and that is where they'll get nothing.
Taking the commandments very liberally today aren't we?MY FINAL SUGGESTION:
Israel "unblocks" Palestine etc.
BUT
The moment another bomb goes off, and is defined as a TERRORIST attack...
Israel has full (INTERNATIONAL) right to BOMB the Palestinian "headquarters" (or wherever the "big shots" sit).
ALSO
All terrorists will be EXECUTED without any chance for release.
Well, it's the age old "do we negotiate with terrorists" question, and I'm always uneasy to answer it either way because strong utilitarian arguments face strong emotional ones.These are all good points, but I still think it was the right choice. Yes, a lot of terrorists got away and yes, Hamás will try to abduct more soldiers in the future, but in the end, the necessity of getting Gilad out of captivity trumps all that. It was necessary not only to end the suffering of him and his family, but also to boost the morale of the nation and other soldiers, who need to know that in the end their country will not abandon them, no matter what.
Yeah, sounds like there are only winners in this deal, doesn't it?And if you followed the news, you could see that politicians on all sides are milking this story - Netanyahu had an emotive speech about how he told the family "I got your son back" (), Hamás will no doubt present it as another step in the struggle to drive the Zionists out of the promised land, even Abbás is trying to jump on the bandwagon, afraid that it might strengthen his Hamás rivals.
Except Fatah.