Guilty of rape by deception

Hey cool does this mean one can accuse a 16 year old girl for rape because she lied about her age and one wouldn't have consented with knowledge that she was under the age of consent???
Well if this happen in Russia a guy is safe. We have AoC = 16 yo :D.
 
No it didn't really happen. You think she raped the man?

he thinks what she did should be against the law.
 
No, she didn't, but she deceived him. What if she was actually 45? She could scar him for life!

Its deception, different crime, different consequences, but not consequence-free.
So you think all types of deception should be illegal? Or just those related to sex?
 
So you think all types of deception should be illegal? Or just those related to sex?

Not all kinds of deception. Its part of "Your rights end where mine begin." Obviously deception which leads to someone's death is illegal. In this case, I also think it should be ILLEGAL. Not in all cases of deception, but the ones that can actually cause permanent harm to people.
 
Well, he did lie, not about being black but about being single, and I think there should be some punishment for that. Not as much as if it were violent by any means, but something.
So he gets 12 months for lying to her while she gets nothing for lying to the court? :ack: The guy's a douchebag (though probably not more than she is), but sending him to prison over this is just ridiculous

Hey cool does this mean one can accuse a 16 year old girl for rape because she lied about her age and one wouldn't have consented with knowledge that she was under the age of consent???
Somebody should forward the memo to Ribéry...
 
Well, he did lie, not about being black but about being single, and I think there should be some punishment for that. Not as much as if it were violent by any means, but something.

If you sleep with someone within a few minutes of meeting them you are doing it for sexual pleasure not with the aim of having a long term relationship.

Most people are aware that people do not always tell the truth in such situations.
If the blind women is willing to have a one night stand or bunk up in an office in the middle of the day within minutes of meeting the black man then she is not giving herself any time to find out about the man.

I assume that the blind women was of sound mind and was not drunk because it was midday.
 
So he gets 12 months for lying to her while she gets nothing for lying to the court? :ack: The guy's a douchebag (though probably not more than she is), but sending him to prison over this is just ridiculous

Where did she lie to the court? If she did she should get punished too.

I also never endorsed the sentence they gave, and said it was probably too high. I just said there should be some sort of punishment. Also, I oppose prison, so how can I support this sentence?;)

(Seriously though I was saying the sentence should be less, my opposition to prisons have nothing to do with it.)
 
A black man is approached by a blind women in the street and they start talking.
It is in a white area.
He gives a name that is not used by blacks and says he is single when he is not.
After a few minutes they go to an office and have sex.
He leaves quickly and she is upset.
Latter she finds out that he was a black man and she reports that he violently raped her.

Young man in his mid-20s chats to woman in the bar, woman says she's 26, but actually she's 35. They have sex 7 times before he finds out her true age. Woman is convicted on 7 counts of rape, sentenced to life in jail.

Wrong.

If, in each case respectively, it was stipulated beforehand that he must not be black and must be married, or that she must be younger than 30, then this 'rape by deception' may apply.

I think we can alll agree the punishment is far too harsh. However, it is a law founded on principles. It exists to give protection but as an unintended consequence of the ambiguity of 'deception,' cases like this arise.
 
Correct in the former case.

In the latter case I think lying about your age in order to be able to get sex should be illegal in the first place. If he didn't ask and assumed she was under thirty, its his own fault.
 
Bull. This is not deception, this is an ancient and proud tradition of male weaseling. Furthermore, I'd go so far as to say that girl is a rasist.

Good day, gentlemen!
 
Bull. This is not deception, this is an ancient and proud tradition of male weaseling. Furthermore, I'd go so far as to say that girl is a rasist.

Good day, gentlemen!

Sure she's racist, but that's allowed under law. You can marry whoever you want, and you can sleep with whoever you want, if you both agree...
 
Wrong.

If, in each case respectively, it was stipulated beforehand that he must not be black and must be married, or that she must be younger than 30, then this 'rape by deception' may apply.

I think we can alll agree the punishment is far too harsh. However, it is a law founded on principles. It exists to give protection but as an unintended consequence of the ambiguity of 'deception,' cases like this arise.

The blind women just thought he was a whiteman not a blackman.
He gave a white sounding name and was in a white area and sounded white when he spoke.

If you sleep with some one within minutes of meeting them then it would not be reasonable to beleive that you were looking for a long term relationship. They did not go on a few dates to find anything about each other first.
 
The blind women just thought he was a whiteman not a blackman.
He gave a white sounding name and was in a white area and sounded white when he spoke.

If you sleep with some one within minutes of meeting them then it would not be reasonable to beleive that you were looking for a long term relationship. They did not go on a few dates to find anything about each other first.

I agree, since he didn't say he was white, "Deception" doesn't apply there.

If he said he was looking for a long term relationship, maybe he should be punished, if not then the woman's got no leg to stand on.
 
Uh, no. If you're looking for a relationship you don't sleep with perfect strangers
 
Uh, no. If you're looking for a relationship you don't sleep with perfect strangers

Yes, she is an idiot if she thought that. If he ACTUALLY SAID he was looking for a relationship she MIGHT have something in monetary damages, definitely not jail though. I would probably agree with you guys though.
 
Haha, I was going to post this! I wonder if anyone would still deny that Israel is a racist state, along the same lines as pre-Mandela South Africa and pre-King USA.
 
Yes, she is an idiot if she thought that. If he ACTUALLY SAID he was looking for a relationship she MIGHT have something in monetary damages, definitely not jail though. I would probably agree with you guys though.

Absolutely not. You evidently have no idea how the whole "Imma have sex with you" thing works.
 
Haha, I was going to post this! I wonder if anyone would still deny that Israel is a racist state, along the same lines as pre-Mandela South Africa and pre-King USA.

The thing is, the Arabs have the rest of the Middle East, the Israelites want them OUT OF THEIR LAND. I don't necessarily blame then. I'll have to ask some pro-Israel people though to get a balanced prospective. I really don't know much about the subject.
 
Back
Top Bottom