Half of the US bans abortion. Then what?

Ohhhh I'm sorry, I hadn't even thought of like science fictiony type things! And yes I feel you're totally right, it's not really about abortions but gender control, so yes that makes a lot of sense to me.

Yes, 650 000 abortions doesn't look like millions. Also, does that 33 000 include Americans killed by police or armed security, or killed by firearms serving in the U.S. military abroad, or other "activities" condoned, more or less, by the U.S. government?
From what I'm reading, I think it does include police related deaths because it has a category "legal intervention" of around 400. I don't know about military, I guess that'd be something totally different, right? Oh and statistically I'm seeing that like 63% of gun related deaths are suicides, that's really the biggest one there.
 
If you're attempting to control population or fertility either on a socio-engineering scale, a family-finance scale, or anything like that, you get way more fertility control out of culling female offspring than male.

Now I don't know what to think.

Well. Don't take a "rape-publican," was it, word on it. He's already assessed the value of yours. ;)

Other than consent, you know what else seems quaint these days? Getting upset about "Obummer." :lol:
 
If you're attempting to control population or fertility either on a socio-engineering scale, a family-finance scale, or anything like that, you get way more fertility control out of culling female offspring than male.



Well. Don't take a "rape-publican," was it, word on it. He's already assessed the value of yours. ;)

Other than consent, you know what else seems quaint these days? Getting upset about "Obummer." :lol:
I've decided it's simpler to curl up in a ball and rock back and forth crying. Seems appropriate given the state of the world anyway.
 
If you're attempting to control population or fertility either on a socio-engineering scale, a family-finance scale, or anything like that, you get way more fertility control out of culling female offspring than male.



Well. Don't take a "rape-publican," was it, word on it. He's already assessed the value of yours. ;)

Other than consent, you know what else seems quaint these days? Getting upset about "Obummer." :lol:

I think it is "rape-ublican." Double popping the p sound is much harder to pronounce.
 
If you're attempting to control population or fertility either on a socio-engineering scale, a family-finance scale, or anything like that, you get way more fertility control out of culling female offspring than male.

Well, the groups around the world who do "ethnic cleansing," even to this day, like to wipe out whole demographics wholesale, of all genders and social classes. Of course, the knights in shining armour and virtuous crusaders that are the U.S. Republicans have jumped on the bandwagon of denouncing such barbaric tactics as being "fascistic," "Stalinist," or "tribal," - so they prefer subtler and more Machiavellian methods on cutting down on the numbers of unwanted demographics - like African-Americans and Hispanics, in very large part - that still make them look good. In fact, they're secret think tanks KNOW damned well that illegal abortions (and drug use) leads to far death among these particular demographics, and deaths by gun violence seem disproportionately to affect unwanted demographics. The ideologues and planners among the GOP (those ones who organize campaign, run think tanks, and churn out platforms, but strangely never election themselves - you know the ones, or maybe you don't, many can't name them) know these drawback of the "moral high horse" laws they pass. But they're features, not bugs.
 
Must be the Shriners.
 
Thanks @hobbsyoyo :D

I think it is "rape-ublican." Double popping the p sound is much harder to pronounce.
Reminded me of this... hilarious... Goto 1:00 for the delivery from Tommy Lee Jones as Thaddeus Stevens (the whole clip 2 mins is lol funny if you want to watch the whole thing):

 
As a segwe, @Sommerswerd, given your avatar links, Zod was always one of my absolute favourite villains in DC Comics canon...
 
I no rite Sommer? Lazy enunciation with our slurs and the condemnation of the shadow hands of society. Can we get somebody whining about the papists to make it actually totally super right at home? :lol:
 
I don't see how that's at all relevant. That would remain the case whether or not prostitution was legal - in fact, whether or not we lived in a hard-core puritanical society whether even the slightest public immodesty or sexually provocative gesture in public or anything even viewed as close to intimate contact with something you weren't in lawful matrimony with was SEVERELY punished. That's a fact of our physiologically and psychologically as a species, not an answer to a legal question.

I am not surprised
 
If you're attempting to control population or fertility either on a socio-engineering scale, a family-finance scale, or anything like that, you get way more fertility control out of culling female offspring than male.


Sex selection abortion isn't about population control. It's about societies which place much more value on son's than daughters.
 
Edit: Stupid and useless post. If you read it, sorry.
 
Last edited:
I am not surprised
It seems to me that your elusive and snide posts are so you don't have to break a façade of objective, rational thinking and betray a moral bias you'd like to impose on others. Please, disabuse of me of that notion in an eloquent way if I'm wrong.
 
Well, freemasons and whatnot. Probably Catholics just trying to reduce abortions so they have more kids to rape. If I get the appropriate academic rigor for the environment an the slurs at CFC these days.
 
About what I'd expect Sire HoloDoc the Shirtless.
 
About what I'd expect Sire HoloDoc the Shirtless.
Eerily, I am shirtless as I type this. AND NOW I'M SHOUTING ABOUT SOMETHING TO DO WITH THE LIBERAL MEDIA!

And that is how you cite Alex Jones.

Any societies that place more value n daughters than sons? There has to be at least one, right?
 
Back
Top Bottom