Halo Movie gets pulled

.Shane. said:
Good news! I wish the whole movie-based-on-a-video-game genre would shrivel up and die, but, more likely the opposite will happen.

i saw Doom. with the rock, it sucked even worse than his other movie, the scorpion king. i thought that was impossible but the rock pulled it off.

wow what a dumbass movie.


Drool4Res-pect said:
You've never seen the movie Doom have you? Trust me, it kicks @ss! Also, it wasn't very video-gamish anyway, it was pretty much a normal movie.

Edit: that's the only movie based on a video game I've ever seen so I'm not an expert on the subject.

you actually liked it? the story was crap man, you couldve made up somethign better in 20 minutes, i know i could.

the action wasnt there, no huge explsions just a buncha CGI and some bad acting while sneaking around in darkness crap.

not only did the movie suck, it was great to see the rock on the today show talk to jon stewart about the movie and the game its based on and lie his guts out. apparently he never played the game and thats fine, but he lied about it and tried to make crap up on the spot. hilarious.
 
I'm still waiting for the MGS movie. If that flops, then I'm writing off movies based on vg.
 
Jawz II said:
i saw Doom. with the rock, it sucked even worse than his other movie, the scorpion king. i thought that was impossible but the rock pulled it off.

wow what a dumbass movie.




you actually liked it? the story was crap man, you couldve made up somethign better in 20 minutes, i know i could.

the action wasnt there, no huge explsions just a buncha CGI and some bad acting while sneaking around in darkness crap.

not only did the movie suck, it was great to see the rock on the today show talk to jon stewart about the movie and the game its based on and lie his guts out. apparently he never played the game and thats fine, but he lied about it and tried to make crap up on the spot. hilarious.


I didn't like Doom cause it was just the humans fighting themselves instead of aliens. This was the fundamental flaw in the movie. Too bad cause the rock is actually a good actor I think.
 
Actually it was was Uwe Boll, or what ever that guys name is, that ruined the computer game movies and not Doom
 
What annoys me is that some games have awesome plots but when it comes to writing the movies they don't recruit the plot writers for the games, they go with some hack who couldn't write a good movie if his life depended on it. Get authors or imaginitive people to write plots for game conversion films, it seems to me that they pluck some average writer of movies to write something average or worse, and not some great writer to make something better. Hollywood obviously can't afford real creative talent ;)
 
Told ya so! :p

http://www.latimes.com/technology/la-fi-halo21oct21,1,4323031.story?coll=la-headlines-technology

Los Angeles Times said:
Microsoft Corp. said Friday that it would move forward with a movie adaptation based on its popular video game "Halo" after financial backers Universal Pictures and 20th Century Fox backed out of the project.

The studios quietly cut their ties to "Halo" this month because of costs associated with the movie, which had a preliminary budget of $145 million, said sources involved in the project who declined to be named. Tensions heightened after the studios failed to persuade the filmmakers, including executive producer Peter Jackson, director of the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy, to renegotiate their contracts.

"We are disappointed that Universal wanted to significantly renegotiate the financial points of the deal," Microsoft said in a statement Friday. "We are already in discussions with potential partners who recognize the value of the 'Halo' brand."

The Redmond, Wash.-based software giant had also refused to take a pay cut demanded by the studios. In the summer of 2005, when the studios signed on to the project amid great fanfare, they agreed to pay Microsoft $5 million upfront for the rights as well as 7.5% of revenue they received from theaters.

The deal guaranteed Microsoft and other key talent payment before either studio made a penny on the movie, scheduled for a summer 2008 release.

One source reported a power struggle between Fox and Universal over control of the movie. Both studios declined to comment.

The production will move ahead under the direction of producer Mary Parent, a former co-head of production at the studio who still has a deal there. Jackson and Fran Walsh will remain executive producers of the project.

The studios' decision is another example of Hollywood's sensitivity to skyrocketing budgets. Facing increasing pressure to rein in production and marketing costs as box-office receipts and DVD sales have flattened, several studios have abandoned expensive movies in recent months and in some cases renegotiated talent deals to reduce their risks. For instance, Fox recently jettisoned "Used Guys," starring Jim Carrey, because of its high cost and the actor's expensive "profit participation."

Struggling to bring down the estimated $175-million budget of its summer comedy "Evan Almighty," Universal renegotiated profit-participation deals so the studio could recoup its expenses.

Universal is in the hot seat with its parent company, General Electric Corp., largely because of its mediocre year at the box office. On Thursday, GE's NBC Universal unit announced a $750-million cost-cutting program.

For Universal and Fox, the "Halo" deal was risky from the start. Although video games are popular with young boys, they have not translated well to the big screen. "Lara Croft: Tomb Raider" has been the most successful of the genre, grossing $131 million domestically and $143 million abroad. However, its 2003 sequel "Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life" did not do well, grossing only $65 million here and a similar amount overseas.

"People are still waiting for the first good movie that is based on a video game," said Brandon Gray, head of Box Office Mojo, which tracks ticket sales. "There hasn't been one yet. Story is not a forte of video games, and that is why they have not translated well."

Released in 2001, "Halo" is a Mature-rated shooting game in which players embody a character called Master Chief to kill space aliens. The original is one of the 10 bestselling video games ever, with an estimated 5 million copies sold. "Halo 2" has sold 14.5 million units.

But the story has not been easy to adapt to the big screen. The script was initially written by Alex Garland, the British novelist and screenwriter behind Danny Boyle's zombie thriller, "28 Days Later." Garland's version was re-written by D.B. Weiss, who has few listed credits.

Other key players also are inexperienced. This large production replete with complicated special effects will be directed by a 27-year-old first-time feature director, Neill Blomkamp.

Hoping to create a bidding frenzy in Hollywood, Microsoft hired costumed actors to shop the script last year. The "Master Chiefs" sat in the lobbies of the major studios as executives read the screenplay.

Only Fox and Universal were interested. They agreed to co- finance the movie, with Fox handling international distribution. At the time, other studios wondered why a multibillion-dollar corporation like Microsoft would not fund the movie itself.

Over the last year, producer Parent has made numerous trips to New Zealand, where the production will be filmed at Jackson's special effects facilities, Weta Digital and Weta Workshop. The project is entitled to financial concessions for shooting in that country.

News of the deal's souring had "Halo" fans predicting online that the studios would be sorry.

"Fox and Universal are so going to regret their move when Halo will hit theaters," read a post from AuthenticM. "This flick will rack in huge amounts of money."
 
Shaihulud said:
A pity, i would have like to see it, but it may be hard as the game's protagonist is encased entirely in amour without any feature.

Don't worry, you will see it. Microsoft is funding the project now.
 
woody60707 said:
:agree: The story line for Doom and Doom 2 was pretty kick ass. Why change it?
Wait, the Doom games had a story? I thought you just walked around and killed things for no reason.:lol:

Yuri2356 said:
1.The Marines were incompetent (Didn't even wear helmets!), 2.the Daemons were Biotech-Wank instead of vicious skin eating hell spawns ('Genetic' has become the new 'nuclear' of Stupid B-Movies. You can do ANYTHING with GENES!!!11!!), 3.Pinky was among the most useless operator/co-coordinator characters I've ever seen, and 4.the BFG was pathetically underused.

Doom - Sucked.
1. They didn't wear helmets to make them look tougher, other than that I don't know what you're talking about.
2. Who cares?
3. He was suppoesed to be, that was his charicter.
4. Okay, I'll give you that one, it was only fired twice in the whole film, only once did it kill anything, and never did you actully see what it killed, pathetic yes.

Doom - Flawed, yes, but entertaining, very yes.

Just my opinion.
 
Kan' Sharuminar said:
Keep calm folks, we still have the Super Mario Bros movie to keep us right.

...or is that just me? :p
Darn it, can't find an earlier game movie. Looks like the chain is broken! :(
 
200 million dollar movies just aren't profitable anymore. LotR was the last of a dying breed.

Low budget indy flicks are all the rage now. Cheap to make and they earn 10 times their budget at the box office.
 
The Halo movie will, in proper gamer lingo, PWN.
 
Drool4Res-pect said:
1. They didn't wear helmets to make them look tougher, other than that I don't know what you're talking about.
Woulnd't they have looked tougher with kickass futuristic helmets, featuring built in night vision, Infared, and Heads-Up-Display that works in coordination with a Guncam?

The practicality of wearing something to protect your head has been known of for ages. Would you send soldiers into a hostile situation at remotte location, with less head protection than a Cyclist? :crazyeye:

Other than that, the general way that they carry themselves in battle is just so cheezey and unprofessional, it snaps all suspension of disbeleif cleanly in half. They acted more like a bunch of street punks than a team of elite Soldiers, it's the same crap that B-grade Movies have fed us for ages.
2. Who cares?
It's carrying on the disgusting and blatant misuse of sciences in movies as something that acts more like Magic. A Genetic map of the Soul? Distinct alleles that mark one as 'good' or 'evil'? :rolleyes:

That, and it's the sort of preemptive bending-over-backwards that would send people into a rage if it were done to avoid offending Muslims, but for Christians? No problem with their morals getting imposed what could have been two hours of the purest awesome. Come on, Fighting Deamons On Mars!
3. He was suppoesed to be, that was his charicter.
And he was a useless charcter. A Hampster could have played the roll better.
4. Okay, I'll give you that one, it was only fired twice in the whole film, only once did it kill anything, and never did you actully see what it killed, pathetic yes.
Glad we agree on that. Too many wasted bullets, not enough 'sploding.
Doom - Flawed, yes, but entertaining, very yes.

Just my opinion.

And you're quite entitled to it. Mine is that the film's stupidity makes my Eyes hurt.


And as to Hell offending Christians, they still managed to release a film containing a Devout Cristian who cuts himself whenever he takes the Lord's name in vain, then becomes a zombie and makes the sign of the cross before bashing his rotting skull against the saftey glass until his skull cracks. Nothing that might tick the fundies off there... Not at all...

But I'm straying off of Topic here.
 
Yoda Power said:
Why not make a movie based on Civilization?

I see it now... a high-stakes film of political intrigue, as negotiators scramble back and forth to avoid the evil, totalitarian Gandhi nuking the poor, undeveloped American nation.
 
Back
Top Bottom