Hillary Clinton got a child rapist off on all charges when she knew he was guilty

[civman110]

Link to video.


*Got him off with 2 months prison time. Not all charges.

She admits she knew he was guilty. She is one sick puppy.

 

[JollyRoger]

I never knew she defended Glenn Beck.

 

[civman110]

I never knew she defended Glenn Beck.

I find your first reaction to something like this absolutely appalling and disgusting. A child was raped and you want to turn it into some kind of political thing? Or make a statement like that as a joke? Or you're making a comment like that because you think it will get a dig in at me? That is shameful in my honest to God opinion.

Hillary Clinton is by her own admission a horrible soulless human being.


Link to video.

 

[Zkribbler]

So let me get this straight.

The client took a polygraph test and passed it.
The crime lab destroyed the evidence so the defense never had a chance to examine it.
So kind of report comes back, and we don't even know what was in it.
And this means, Hillary "knew" he was guilty??

And BTW, defense counsel are supposed to DEFEND their clients.

All in all, Hillary seems much more enamoured with the Constitution that you are.

 

[civman110]

The client took a polygraph test and passed it.

And this means, Hillary "knew" he was guilty??

Hillary admits she knew he was guilty on the tape and laughed about getting him off with 2 months.

"He took a polygraph test and passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs." - Hillary


Link to video.

Link to video.

Keep drinking the kool-aid. She's pro-woman. Barf.

 

[Zkribbler]

He passed the lie detector test, and that how she KNEW he was guilty?

 

[civman110]

Listen to the tapes. Don't be a mindless sheep.

 

[gay_Aleks]

That is weird, accusing people of turning it to political when you obviously are doing it. Oh, how have the mighty fallen.

 

[civman110]

That is weird, accusing people of turning it to political when you obviously are doing it. Oh, how have the mighty fallen.

How am I making it political? I'm not allowed to think Hillary Clinton is a horrible human being?

Are you serious?

 

[gay_Aleks]

It's certainly suspicious. If it was known for so long, why did you reveal the truth now?

 

[civman110]

It's certainly suspicious. If it was known for so long, why did you reveal the truth now?

I'm sorry I failed to inform you personally on the Civ Fanatics Forum as soon as this story broke. From now on this will be my top priority for every dirtbag that's exposed in the news. Would you like a personalized list of everyone that I do not like and, or think is a scumbag?

 

[gay_Aleks]

Yes, I'll welcome that, I enjoy knowing the people you hate. It's the ones that are at least a lick more sensible than you.

 

[civman110]

Yes, I'll welcome that, I enjoy knowing the people you hate. It's the ones that are at least a lick more sensible than you.

So you have no problem with Hillary laughing about getting a child rapists off when she admits she knew he was guilty? Or her laughing and joking about a human being being brutally killed? (Gaddafi was beaten to death and dragged behind vehicles. He died from stab wounds, several of which were up his rectum).

That sure doesn't seem like sensible behaviour to me.

 

[Arwon]

wait so the lawyer done lawyered

 

[FriendlyFire]

wait so the lawyer done lawyered

I demand Lawyers should be shot in the face with a shotgun !
Its LEGAL if a vice president dose it !!!!!!

 

[Borachio]

OK.

1. A defence lawyer gets a not guilty verdict on a client they know is guilty.

2. A prosecution lawyer failed to get a guilty verdict on a suspect they know is guilty.

Shouldn't both be pilloried for this?

And shouldn't the justice system be equally indicted for not working correctly?

 

[bathsheba666]

I find your first reaction to something like this absolutely appalling and disgusting. A child was raped and you want to turn it into some kind of political thing? Or make a statement like that as a joke? Or you're making a comment like that because you think it will get a dig in at me? That is shameful in my honest to God opinion.

Hillary Clinton is by her own admission a horrible soulless human being.

A child was raped and you want to turn it into some kind of political thing?

Good question. What's your answer ?

 

[Verbose]

So... At worst it's a calumny, at best indication that Clinton might at one point have been a professional and resaonable effective defense atorney — working within the bounds of the assigned roles within the US justice system.

So that system doesn't always and impeccably deliver just or even reasonable verdicts?

Hey, maybe H. Clinton might DO something about that, if elected president — since she's might have actual experience of the system failing relatively?

 

[thecrazyscot]

I watched the video, and I didn't at all have the same takeaway. Several thoughts:

1. There's nothing wrong about voluntarily defending a guilty man. Every person deserves a trial, and is innocent until proven guilty. It's the foundational tenet of our criminal justice system. Nothing wrong there.

2. The prosecution (or at least the lab) mishandled the evidence, effectively destroying their own case. What would you have the system do? Should we be handing out heavy sentences without evidence now? The integrity of the system is essential to justice, even if that means the guilty sometimes get off. It would be a far greater harm to have more innocent people punished for something they didn't do, which is what would happen if evidence we allowed to be mishandled like this.

3. They plea bargained, so he admitted his guilt despite the fact that they didn't have evidence to stand on to prevent the case from going to a jury trial, where a prosecution who mishandled evidence ran a very real risk of losing the case. Besides, something like 90% of criminal cases end with a plea bargain in the US. I didn't look up the specifics of what he plead guilty to, exactly, but if it were a sexual charge then he would be placed on the sex offenders registry and be subject to continued monitoring by law enforcement, restrictions on where he could work, live, or even walk.

Bottom line, I'm afraid your thread title is a blatantly negative spin on what actually happened. I'm not a huge fan of HRC (nor am I a huge fan of any other politician, tbh), but this is really grasping at straws.

 

[Kyriakos]

So... At worst it's a calumny, at best indication that Clinton might at one point have been a professional and resaonable effective defense atorney — working within the bounds of the assigned roles within the US justice system.

So that system doesn't always and impeccably deliver just or even reasonable verdicts?

Hey, maybe H. Clinton might DO something about that, if elected president — since she's might have actual experience of the system failing relatively?

Yeah well, it is not really nice that a person prefers to win a law case even if that means they willingly defend someone who they think is very much guilty of rape of a child. At the very least it would not really be seen as a non-jerkish thing to do. Maybe not even a non-sociopath thing to do.

But Clinton is known to be really a horrible choice for president of the US. Granted that many or all of the Gop nominees may also be as horrible, but this is no reason to celebrate. Maybe at least try to have some more decent nomination from the LeftRepublican party instead of Hillary?