1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

History Questions Not Worth Their Own Thread VII

Discussion in 'World History' started by Plotinus, Sep 24, 2014.

  1. Cheezy the Wiz

    Cheezy the Wiz Socialist In A Hurry

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    25,238
    Location:
    Freedonia
     
  2. sydhe

    sydhe King of Kongs

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2001
    Messages:
    2,426
    Location:
    Norman Oklahoma
    Pangaea wasn't the first time all (or at least most) of the continents gathered together. Earlier there were Rodinia, Columbia, and Kenorland. There were a couple of other "supercontinents" before then, but they were much smaller, since the continental crust was stlll forming. There's a roughly 500 million year supercontinent cycle starting roughly 3 - 3.5 billion years ago. We have a few hundred million years before we get the next Pangaea.
     
  3. Lohrenswald

    Lohrenswald 老任森林

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2013
    Messages:
    6,046
    Location:
    The end
    Pangea isn't history though, right?
     
  4. sydhe

    sydhe King of Kongs

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2001
    Messages:
    2,426
    Location:
    Norman Oklahoma
    Well, I haven't seen it around lately.;)
     
  5. jackelgull

    jackelgull An aberration of nature

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Messages:
    3,244
    Location:
    Within the realm of impossibility
    Well, first they had to decide whether their kingdom belonged to India or Pakistan which is what the Kashmir dispute between India and Pakistan was all about. The rulers wanted to be a part of India but the populace supported being a part of Pakistan. Some, like Hyderabad declared themselves a part of neither and had their independent states annexed by the Indian army, which was decently armed due to World War 2. See Hyderabad. But yes, many did become politicians until they were supplanted by former Bollywood actors.

    And India handled the affair with great tact, it is one of the things I'll give the government credit for- it understands how to run a federal system.
    And I believe the descendants of the Nizam of Hyderabad while not the richest people in the world as their ancestor had been are still doing pretty well for themselves.
     
  6. daft

    daft The fargone

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2013
    Messages:
    1,398
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    New World
    What? But of course it is!
    Read up on your history.
     
  7. kiwitt

    kiwitt Road to War Modder

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    5,550
    Location:
    Auckland, NZ (GMT+12)
    Correct!
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History
     
  8. daft

    daft The fargone

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2013
    Messages:
    1,398
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    New World
    What about the Sikhs?
    Isn't the formation of all those nations thanks in part to the British? I mean, before they appeared in the area there was just India, or am I wrong?
     
  9. daft

    daft The fargone

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2013
    Messages:
    1,398
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    New World
    Russo-Japanese wars are a topic not very well known to outsiders, well, the likes of myself.
     
  10. jackelgull

    jackelgull An aberration of nature

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Messages:
    3,244
    Location:
    Within the realm of impossibility
    Eh, you're right and you're wrong. At the time of British imperialism in India, there was nominally a central government in the Mughal empire, but the real power lay in the hands of local rulers, who vied with one another for power with the central government feebly protesting. The British got their start as mercenaries selling their soldiers to local princes in exchange for land. And the British often bribed the army of their enemies to turn on their leader. The concept that Britain invaded and defeated a central government o win India is a story that severely overestimates British competence imo. Much of the British empire came about haphazardly and in India this is no exception.
     
  11. daft

    daft The fargone

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2013
    Messages:
    1,398
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    New World
    Thanks, I have little knowledge of India's past, I appreciate it.
     
  12. daft

    daft The fargone

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2013
    Messages:
    1,398
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    New World
    Questions about The 3 Great Pyramids:

    The Three Great Pyramids of Giza are larger and much better constructed than any other ancient Egyptian Pyramids, is this correct?

    Are they older than other pyramids?

    Was the Sphinx constructed around the same time as the 3 Great Pyramids?

    Are the 3 Great Pyramids different from the other ones?, in what ways? Were they, or were they not, the resting places of Pharaohs?
     
  13. Agent327

    Agent327 Observer

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Messages:
    16,102
    Location:
    In orbit
    Yes.

    Yes. (But see below.)

    Most probably.

    They were constructed over an extended period of time, construction being begun years in advance of the pharaoh's expected death. Prior to the Great Pyramid some efforts to construct a pyramid-type building were undertaken. (Notably the so-called bent pyramid.) Later pyramids were generally much smaller in size, probably because of the time and effort invested in the first three. The first three pyramids were all constructed during reigns of pharaohs that happened to live long enough to see contruction completed. Also, of course, this was a very rich period in ancient Egyptian history. (Literally.) This may also have played a part in later pyramids being much smaller in size.

    Yes. They are to date the most giant tomb structures ever built. Each pyramid was provided with ample religous structures to keep the memory of the deceased pharaoh alive (who upon death supposedly became a god - a transition from what he was during life: 'the living god'.) The sphinx was probably a part of one such religious complexes. surrounding the entire complex (including the pyramid itself) would be a wall with one or more entrances. So in ancient times the whole pyramid complex would have been even larger than what can be seen today.

    More information on the pyramids wikipedia page.
     
  14. Arakhor

    Arakhor Dremora Courtier Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2009
    Messages:
    35,854
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    UK
    Most yes or no questions can be found out with just a little reading, say on Wikipedia.
     
  15. Domen

    Domen Misico dux Vandalorum

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2009
    Messages:
    8,088
    Location:
    Doggerland
    Cheezy, I knew you would like it! :goodjob:

    ==============================

    Agent327 and daft - isn't the step pyramid of Djoser older than the Three Great Pyramids ???
     
  16. Arakhor

    Arakhor Dremora Courtier Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2009
    Messages:
    35,854
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    UK
    Pretty certainly, yes. Djoser belonged to the Third Dynasty, whilst Khufu came from the Fourth, I believe.
     
  17. r16

    r16 not deity

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    6,681
    thanks for the information . So it seems the present continents can be dated back to 3 billion years ago and they were still "recognizable" with close enough shapes , is that so ?


    sorry , ı wouldn't know where else to ask .

    as much ı am , though they were a prime reason why Russia turned on easier conquests , besides joining the Anglo-French pact of destruction against us which necessitated the incapacitation of Germany first .
     
  18. daft

    daft The fargone

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2013
    Messages:
    1,398
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    New World
    Agent327, thanks for the answers.
     
  19. daft

    daft The fargone

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2013
    Messages:
    1,398
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    New World
    What caused the global drought which caused the collapse of the old Egyptian Kingdom? (in around 2200-2300 BC)?

    Why did the Ancient Egyptians abandon the construction of Pyramids? Any approximate dating?
     
  20. Agent327

    Agent327 Observer

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Messages:
    16,102
    Location:
    In orbit
    A global draught? I'm beginning to wonder where you get your information... The Ancient Kingdom didn't collapse at all: central authority gradually eroded, a feature typical of the so-called Intermediate Periods, when rival power centres (usually provincial) expanded at the cost of the central pharaonic one.

    Never heard of this. The 'Labyrinth' was the name give to the palace of Knossos, which, obviously, is not in Egypt. And yes, it has already been 'excavated'. The labys (axe) was a symbol often used by Minoans, hence the name 'labyrinth'.
     

Share This Page