Originally posted by PolishAssassin
romulus, augustus, gaius mairus?
Originally posted by calgacus
[ But I will posts links. I don't make these things up you know![]()
BTW, am I right about old Cammy?[/B][/QUOTE
i said in my post i believed you saw it somewhere, i said wouldn't you think the founders would be in order,1,2,3-if marius was the 3rd, how could augustus be the 2nd if came 75 years later? and i said yes camillus was correct![]()
p.s. i visited 10 augustus sites, no mention of 2nd founder, only father of the countryhave fun at the show
![]()
Originally posted by PolishAssassin
how bout you take a shot![]()
Originally posted by pawpaw
theres only one problem with your calling octavian the 2nd founder--he was never called it. your links say-and i quote, he CONSIDERED calling himself the 2nd founder but choose augustus instead. 2 other links say, i quote ,the senete CONSIDERED calling him the 2nd founder but decided on augustushence he was never called the secound founder
Originally posted by pawpaw
its calgacus turn