How do you pronounce usernames?

Hmm. I can see that's the idea. But I fear the range of possible human vocalizations is just too vast for this to be realistic. We all of us talk differently. Otherwise we'd all sound alike. And we don't.

Belonging to a particular linguistic group means your speech falls within a certain range. And that's about it, isn't it?
 
Hmm. I can see that's the idea. But I fear the range of possible human vocalizations is just too vast for this to be realistic. We all of us talk differently. Otherwise we'd all sound alike. And we don't.

Belonging to a particular linguistic group means your speech falls within a certain range. And that's about it, isn't it?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoneme
 
No fun allowed in this thread
 
Birdjaguar = mod.er.a.tor

If your name does not have an obvious pronunciation, I treat it as a graphic.
 
+1


There's a reason why there's an entire academic subject called "Linguistics"

And it's an extremely difficult academic subject. But then most of them are.

If I look long and hard enough at practically anything, sooner or later I realize I don't understand anything about it.

(Actually, it doesn't generally take me more than a minute or two.)

Would anyone care to offer a definition of "phonetically similar"?
 
Now in SOUNDVISION

hobbsyoyo -> hobbs - yo - yo
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1SnJ78tOwpx

Takhisis -> Tack - hee - sis
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1HSzYKD4UT9

Borachio -> Bore - ahk - eee - oh
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0yvoBCfhhZd

rugbyLEAGUEfan -> rug - bee - LEEG - fan
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0LDdGAyYpF8
(would've been much more obnoxious if not for my sleeping wife)

Virote_Considon -> Veer - oat - ee - con - sid - on
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0Fe6bziZN9j

Quackers -> kwack - ers
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1idgHvZR4Yk;)

Mise -> Myz
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0Vq8ld6ZOUs

Cutlass -> cut - lass (soft 'a', it sounds like something between lAss and less, don't know how to write it)
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1MszQpdrfkP

Crezth -> creh - zith
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1efjH0jizUp

Zelig -> zay - lig or mars
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1sywBJwhfLV

Patroklos - ee - gull - fas
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0s4641TsoO6

Oruc -> Or - uck
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0qxNknU1Fuf

Synsensa -> sin - sin - sa
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1bxFoke5CD3

Leoreth -> lee - o - reth
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1yJuZ7UVrxU

JoanK -> jone - Kay (the e in jone is silent, it's like jones without the s)
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0tIns0ZOQTv

Phrossack -> Frah - sack
http://vocaroo.com/i/s05Gl6rUIGko

Arakhor -> air - ack - or
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1xWHZ8qRJ6l

Owen Glyndwr -> O - win Glend - were
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0KrgfdIKSeM

Dachs -> Dacks
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1Mv6L3s3WOn

cybrxkhan -> sigh - burr - zhan
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0iwBg7Wzna1

Gucumatz -> goo - coo - matz
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1wxwGpiyPoI
 
No me? I am disappointed Joe! I wanted to hear my name in your wonderful southern twang!
 
Would anyone care to offer a definition of "phonetically similar"?

Damn. I just realized I missed the entire backend of this thread.

Phonetically similar can have a number of different contexts, but generally it refers to sounds which bear similarities.

Consonants have 3 areas of distinction: area of articulation, manner of articulation, and voiced or unvoiced. The area of articulation refers to where the sound is formed, manner how it is formed, and voiced/un refers to whether or not the vocal chords are engaged during the sound's formation. Let's take an example /d/.

/d/ is called a voiced alveolar plosive. This means that the sound is formed by placing the tongue on the alveolar ridge of the mouth (the bump just behind your upper teeth). It is a plosive, which means the sound features a complete stop in the flow of air, as opposed to, say, a fricative (like /f/) which entails a partial impeding of the flow of air, and it is voiced.

/d/ is phonetically similar to /t/ because d is a voiced alveolar plosive, and /t/ is an unvoiced alveolar plosive. /d/ is also phonetically similar to /z/ because while /d/ is the voiced alveolar plosive, /z/ is the voiced alveolar fricative. In other words they're sounds which are identical except for a few small differences.

Presumably you are referring to words which are phonetically similar, which is how linguists determine a language's phonemes. This means finding two different words which are identical save for one sound. For example the English words /kæt/ and /bæt/ (cat and bat, pronounced in Standard American English). The two words are pronounced near identically with the exception of their first consonants: /k/ and /b/. Because other than these two sounds these two words are identical and yet have different meanings, we can identify that /k/ and /b/ are distinct phonemes in the English language. You can and Linguists do do this with thousands of words.
 
No me? I am disappointed Joe! I wanted to hear my name in your wonderful southern twang!
Will do tomorrow. The twang was for show, it only really comes out anymore when I say fanger. I have lived in the midwest long enough that I've starte saying 'fark'. :sad:

I moved around as a kid and whenever we stayed in one place longer than a minute I picked up the local accent. I don't know if that's normal.
 
I always pronounce Owen Glyndwr as "O-wen Glend-weir" and Dachs as "Dakhs". Borachio becomes "Bo-rakh-ee-o" and Crezth becomes "Cre-seth".
 
Yeah, more or less. I think I'll just call him Tee-kay. That's my favourite Digimon character anyway. :D
 
You've an interesting American accent there, though, JoanK. At least, that's how it sounds to me.

Damn. I just realized I missed the entire backend of this thread.

Phonetically similar can have a number of different contexts, but generally it refers to sounds which bear similarities.

Consonants have 3 areas of distinction: area of articulation, manner of articulation, and voiced or unvoiced. The area of articulation refers to where the sound is formed, manner how it is formed, and voiced/un refers to whether or not the vocal chords are engaged during the sound's formation. Let's take an example /d/.

/d/ is called a voiced alveolar plosive. This means that the sound is formed by placing the tongue on the alveolar ridge of the mouth (the bump just behind your upper teeth). It is a plosive, which means the sound features a complete stop in the flow of air, as opposed to, say, a fricative (like /f/) which entails a partial impeding of the flow of air, and it is voiced.

/d/ is phonetically similar to /t/ because d is a voiced alveolar plosive, and /t/ is an unvoiced alveolar plosive. /d/ is also phonetically similar to /z/ because while /d/ is the voiced alveolar plosive, /z/ is the voiced alveolar fricative. In other words they're sounds which are identical except for a few small differences.

Presumably you are referring to words which are phonetically similar, which is how linguists determine a language's phonemes. This means finding two different words which are identical save for one sound. For example the English words /kæt/ and /bæt/ (cat and bat, pronounced in Standard American English). The two words are pronounced near identically with the exception of their first consonants: /k/ and /b/. Because other than these two sounds these two words are identical and yet have different meanings, we can identify that /k/ and /b/ are distinct phonemes in the English language. You can and Linguists do do this with thousands of words.

Yes, I realize that linguistics is largely about this sort of thing.

Nevertheless, it's interesting as to what actually can be rigorously defined as identical phonemes. It seems to be a largely arbitrary definition based on what people's culturally attuned ears have been educated to accept.

It is an immensely complex subject - of which I sadly know very little.

Speech recognition software still has considerable difficulty in simply distinguishing words from each other, for example.
 
My mother always complains about that, saying I have such an American accent and that British accents are so much nicer and... well, "always", the few times I've had to talk in English in front of her. Which means twice or so.
 
Back
Top Bottom