How is your EU3 Game going?

Probably because designing 20+ daimyo factions, on top of the improvements they want to make in China and elsewhere, would start stretching them thin - adding in extra countries is not the easiest thing to do.

:lol:

I'm one of the modders for the WWM mod (in the next version keep an eye out for a completely redone Balkans, Central and Eastern Europe, by me. :goodjob: ) Adding new countries and provinces is not that hard actually. Getting them done with research and accurate borders and history however is something else that Paradox don't want to waste time on. Luckily there is WWM. :)
 
Started as England. Currently about 1451.

eu3eng.png

eu3engdiplo.png


Somehow I ended up inheriting Milan. I don't remember seeing the pop up window, so I can't remember when it happened. Just been busy tearing apart France while I wait for the Form British Nation event to become active.
 
:lol:

I'm one of the modders for the WWM mod (in the next version keep an eye out for a completely redone Balkans, Central and Eastern Europe, by me. :goodjob: ) Adding new countries and provinces is not that hard actually. Getting them done with research and accurate borders and history however is something else that Paradox don't want to waste time on. Luckily there is WWM. :)

Which is, you'll note, the point I was making.

It'S not like I just released a mod with 20+ new countries (mostly only available for an alt history scenario) :-p
 
Not when you want to get the history files to a degree that won't get you lynched by some people for every moment of every year that those countries existed, it's not.

The thing is, they could just ask some of the modders for their history data. Given how fanatical they are, it's likely to be pretty reliable.
 
They could.

On the other hand, another problem is that to properly represent the shifting alliances, raising and falling families and so forth, you're looking at a few dozen families at least - that's a lot of tags.

What Paradox appears to be going for, looking at some recent screenshot, is going by claims of descent - each of the four daimyo does not represent a specific daimyo family (Mori, Oda, etc) but one of the four great court families of pre-feudal Japan, from which the samurai clans claimed descent (Taira, Minamoto, Fujiwara, etc)

Thus we get the Fujiwara "nation" holding North-East Honshu, representing the clans claiming Fujiwara descent that were concentrated there (Date, Uesugi), the Taira "nation" in the middle (Oda, Ise/Hojo), and the Minamoto nation to the west, representing the Mori, Takeda, etc clans.

One presume that there will be lots of "On monarch death: A Taira pretender will rise" allowing the Ise-Hojo and Oda to try and upstage one another every few years as the biggest, baddest Taira claimant.

It's a nice way to cut down on the number of tags needed, I suppose.
 
That's actually a pretty cool idea, and a good way to sidestep the massive number of tags that would be necessary. (Of course, wasn't the shougun supposed to trace descent back to Minamoto no Yoritomo specifically?)
We can leave it to the modders to mod in fighting as specific clans.
 
Great Britain in 1499. Muscovy is going nuts out east.

gb1499.png

gb1499diplo.png
 
So this is what an English victory in the Hundred Years war would look like....
 
No, it isn't.

Muscovy's infamy must be through the roof...
 
No, it isn't.

Muscovy's infamy must be through the roof...

They are getting attacked a lot by countries using the Dishonourable Scum casus belli.
 
Great Britain 1577

gbr1577.png

gbr1577diplo.png


Muscovy's infamy got the better of them as their neighbours have ripped them apart. Also, Holy War cassus belli + India = tons of low infamy provinces :D
 
Can someone tell me if there are mssive mods for this game like there were for eu2?

Or are all new feautures incorporated in the patches?

What version do you play? :)

I might give it at try.
 
Can someone tell me if there are mssive mods for this game like there were for eu2?

Or are all new feautures incorporated in the patches?

What version do you play? :)

I might give it at try.

Yes there are. Magna Mundi is really good as I hear it.
 
It's no more a must than AGCEEP was for EU2 - it's something a lot of people hype up probably a bit more than it really deserves to, although it is good at what it does.

I've been playing without MM for years and I'm quite happy with the lack of framing.

Basically: if you want a detailed history simulator, or the closest thing to one, go Magna Mundi. They tried very hard to cover as well as they could everything they could. If you want a game that gives you a bit more freedom in going off-track and establishing your history, a game that's more about the "What will you do?" sandbox environment than the detailed simulation? Then you want vanilla EU3.
 
I play with just regular EU3 (with all the expansions). I like it a lot more than MM, since I prefer to have the freedom to do whatever I please.

And the only must have mod is Hand Drawn Map. It makes it look beautiful. Much better than the ugly vanilla map.
 
Back
Top Bottom