The ones that take Dobson seriously are hoping Newt Gingrich enters the race.Even Republicans don't take Dobson seriously. If they did, they'd be running to support Brownback.
The ones that take Dobson seriously are hoping Newt Gingrich enters the race.Even Republicans don't take Dobson seriously. If they did, they'd be running to support Brownback.
But Guiliani also supports using public funds to pay for some abortions, and I have to admit, that may just be enough to get my vote.
Come on....ain't he a charmer?
I mean, sure, he's a creepy authoritarian who gets his rocks off publically humiliating his wife and kids to play around with the young stuff. But Guiliani also supports using public funds to pay for some abortions, and I have to admit, that may just be enough to get my vote. Personally, I find abortion to be an option of very last resort, but I'm intruiged by the idea of world where a Republican President openly carries a torch for safe access to abortion. Can you imagine such a political reversal? It might just be enough to bury this aspect of the culture war for good. Granted, pulling a level marked 'R' would probably strip away what little of my immortal soul remains, but if it means we could actually have Senate confirmation hearings for USSC justices that dealt with something other than Roe vs. Wade, it might just be worth it.
I'm an American Catholic, and as such, I tend to break from Rome on a lot of things. (Birth control is a big one.) The Church and I are closer on abortion; I see it as a very negative thing and can't imagine being a part of one in anything but the most radical of situations. That said, I believe it should be legal, and that the Church should stay the hell out of politics. History shows that particular intermingling brings out the worst of both worlds.So I guess you really are just nominally Catholic, as you said a while back. I wasn't sure before.
I'd rather vote for a third party, or heck, write in Daffy Duck, than vote for Giuliani. I can't believe he's a serious contender; running him is a very stupid idea that's liable to destroy the Republican party as anything even resembling a opposition to the Democrats. But hey, we're all screwed anyway, so what the heck.
Will Guiliani get people who vote Democrat to instead register as Republican to vote him in during primaries as a contender?
I'm an American Catholic, and as such, I tend to break from Rome on a lot of things. (Birth control is a big one.) The Church and I are closer on abortion; I see it as a very negative thing and can't imagine being a part of one in anything but the most radical of situations. That said, I believe it should be legal, and that the Church should stay the hell out of politics. History shows that particular intermingling brings out the worst of both worlds.
Same as Mayor Nagin of New Orleans, except without saying "chocolate."
Unless there's something I missed.
No the Mayor of N'awlins just whined about how the government wasn't doing everything for him and about how George Bush hates black people (okay so that was Kanye West, not the point).
No the Mayor of N'awlins just whined about how the government wasn't doing everything for him and about how George Bush hates black people (okay so that was Kanye West, not the point).
Guliani is not going to be the nominee. The Republican candidate for the Presidency is going to be Fred Thompson.
Let me ask you mericans something, after 9/11 I heard alot of praise for Guliani and how he did a good job after the planes went into the buildings.
What did he do exactly? Im curious.
Unless I missed something, Giuliani didn't really do anything, but he looked damn good doing it.