Gori the Grey
The Poster
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2009
- Messages
- 11,005
Imaginings
Research was on the impact of bodily experience on our conception of abstract concepts. Time was chosen as an abstract concept.I’m trying to follow along here: the research was how about we perceive of time in the sense of its relatability to physical objects/space?
Researchers' assumption was that time is not a physical property, yes.Breaking it further down, is the implication that time is not a physical property?
They weren't considering that thing that we know about relativity, but just people's everyday experience of time: appointments, etc.I would then have to conclude that thinking of time as a metaphysical property is wrong.
Seems like that would make people into some real hoseheads.I think nowadays many folks think of time as blocks of minutes on a calendar that can be filled and moved around.
Time only moves forward. We interact with it in blocks we define as important: hours, days, weeks, etc. Time doesn't care. We are just trying to organize it to fit our lives and perspective. Perhaps its linearity is just part of our attempt to control it. I wonder how chimps think about time if they even do.You might be correct about that. But we cross off each past day, so there's still some sense of linearity, sequentiality.
No, it's connected to "time remaining untill the meeting".From the original Wednesday day, which is the starting point, moving the meeting two days earlier to Monday is moving it backwards in time. Moving it to Friday is moving it forward in time. Time only moves in one direction. The whole "forward means closer to me" is connected to the idea that the person who is reading the message is the important part and not the meeting that is under discussion.
The ancient Greeks imagined themselves as walking backward into future time, on the notion that things that have happened (the past) are ones we can know/see, whereas we cannot know what hasn't yet happened.But there are people (and here's where my memory fails me, because I forgot who) who envision themselves moving "backwards" through time as time progresses.
This is very interesting to learn. I think that language does play a huge difference in these matters. As has already been observed, some of these conceptions about abstract concepts are built into idioms, which are language specific.From a French perspective, the only correct way is "monday". Because we would say "meeting moved forward two days" as "le rendez-vous est avancé de deux jours", and this ALWAYS means "closer to now".
What? The move in time?