Hey, you have no right to power-game like that, telling how a nation NOT YOURS is behaving internally based on that I don't like you.
I actually don't care whether or not you like me. The only reason you will exist after the timeskip is because of RC's ruling, not because any of your Pacific neighbors actually want you to exist anymore.
None of them do.
None.
What about, I say now that a major leak of radioactive gas has covered your capital, thus killing all of its citizens and thus making crumble your incipient 3 year old state into an administrative and political chaos that makes your nation disappear.
You can try, but the only country that would probably support that is Austria, and Austria doesn't really matter.
I know what happens in my country. And Oceania now is stable. There are no "competing warlords", nor do you know better what happens in Oceania than I do.
Sorry. I am reading this report prepared by GEAR-PAU political scientists and they are indeed saying that Oceania is in a state of near anarchy, and that peacekeeping operations will be required.
What is your source on the stability of Oceania?
A threat to the Pacific Peace?
No. A threat to Pacific war. That was rhetorical? Sorry.
What about I go by all pages of this thread quoting all the times saying I want peace and not war?
Since there is no Oceanian state, there are no statements you could show me made by a representative of Oceania since, again, Oceania does not exist as a state.
Your credibility is it minimum. It is GEAR that, in a small conflict over a worthless province I only wanted to hold for the sake of roleplaying, have magnified it and turned aside negotiations.
GEAR, like the PAU, does not negotiate with pirates or warlords.
Now someone tell me? Who is the belligerent? I? Or you and GEAR, creating this San Francisco conference with no actual basis whatsoever?
The GEAR and PAU can not be belligerent, since there is no state to act belligerent against.
Or is it that you want to kick me out of the game but you don't have the balls to do so directly?
I am pretty sure direct military intervention via the results of the San Francisco Conference is as direct as it gets, unless you want us to wear neon strobe lights as we do so?
Do not take what the PAU says personally. They have constantly deluded themselves with the illusion of their own superiority, there is no evidence that the tune has changed.
Says the Austrians who wishes badly they were a new Germany and constantly tries to make themselves feel relevant by commentating on everything superior nations do.
More and more it seems, the PAU is taking on the personality and tact of a common schoolroom bully. They take aggressively illegal actions without proper justification and consistently refuse to trust in the concept of diplomatic negotiation.
The PAU is taking a proactive role in theaters that are vital to American security. Just because the Austrians have a long storied history of bending over a table and taking it by whatever superior Germanic people happen to pass along the way doesn't mean Americans have to be as weak.
You can not destroy another nation in this phase without their consent.
Severely reduced.