Stapel
FIAT 850 coupé
Originally posted by phoenix_night
I thought Curt was in Scotland. Isn't he?
PT2 probably thinks Scotland is a city in England

Originally posted by phoenix_night
I thought Curt was in Scotland. Isn't he?
Originally posted by HannibalBarka
Tunesia - Arabs.. Didn't like it. The landscape was just as ugly as the people. Our taxi driver told us that he bought his wife for two camels.
I can't believe a racist post like this can get through:
Originally posted by Stapel
PT2 probably thinks Scotland is a city in England!
Originally posted by PantheraTigris2
Only Canada, and the USA, but seeing as how they are the 2nd & 3rd largest countries in the world, respectively -
Originally posted by sysyphus
I don't mean to burst your bubble PT2, but the USA is 4th largest in the world, China is 3rd (and for trivia mongers out there, Brazil is 5th)
I do agree with you that there is much more to America than on the coasts. I've been all across your country, I know what you are talking about.
Originally posted by Bootstoots
Actually, if he was talking about land area (which I assume he was), China is larger than the US by 167,450 square kilometers. The US is only larger if you factor in the area covered by water under US control.
And I do hope you didn't mean that as a troll.
PantheraTigris2
I am not trolling. You are wrong there, too. You are always wrong, it seems.
As I said before, it is larger only if you factor in "territorial sea" and other bodies of water that the US controls. I believe that it was land area that sysyphus was talking about. In a way, however, you are both correct. And I would like to point out that the US seized land from indiginous Native Americans, so I guess that occupation is illegal too. And while I would support it if China gave Tibet its independence, right now, Tibet is a part of China proper.Originally posted by PantheraTigris2
The U.S. is larger. It is the third largest country in the world. Your point is irrelevant. Why don't I start talking about the illegal occupation of Tibet? Eh? More pointless debate. I am right. You guys are wrong. RTF facts. I am not trolling. You are wrong there, too. You are always wrong, it seems. That tends to happen when you haven't done any research whatsoever.
Originally posted by Junzi Nicuzn
Yeah, thats not trolling![]()
Originally posted by emu
y is water included in Country sizes
Originally posted by Bootstoots
As I said before, it is larger only if you factor in "territorial sea" and other bodies of water that the US controls. I believe that it was land area that sysyphus was talking about. In a way, however, you are both correct. And I would like to point out that the US seized land from indiginous Native Americans, so I guess that occupation is illegal too. And while I would support it if China gave Tibet its independence, right now, Tibet is a part of China proper.
PantheraTigris2
And, if you want to argue with the facts, then fine - but you're wrong there, too.
I am right, and you guys are wrong. But then, what else is new around here.
So what makes Tibet any different? Isn't it just another country that was 'seized' by a stronger neighbor?Originally posted by PantheraTigris2
All countries on this earth were 'seized' from someone else, in some cases several times.
Originally posted by Bootstoots
If you factor in bodies of water under the control of each nation, then you are right. If you count strictly LAND area, then we are right. Can you at least accept this?
Originally posted by emu
i havent heard of those lakes, but land should be the deciding factor for sizes of countries not some stupid lake.