LucyDuke
staring at the clock
Plus, even if the clique is annoying there are still genuinely cool people who may be a part of it.

I challenge anyone who doesn't "hang out with" any given clique to list all the posters who "hang out with" the clique. (Although perhaps that discussion shouldn't be public? I suppose it's a rhetorical challenge.)
On top of that I think they should try to ban certain topics or close popular threads if someone (or certain posters) doesn't behave. So the people who were seriously debating the topic will be mad at the people responsable for the ban or the closure.
I think that's (bolded) not a good idea. If you know a topic is going to rile up what you don't like, stay away from the thread. It's unreasonable to outright ban discussion of something. Even the severity of the ban on PDMA is too much for my taste, although I can understand it. I can't, though, understand how it's productive to shut down something people are obviously that interested in. What would OT be without creationism, atheists, abortion, lunatics, and George Bush? Mostly a bunch of spam about peanut butter and waterboarding, I'll guess.
Threads that get out of line usually are shut down, or the parties responsible for the fuss are usually "removed". And other people do get mad at them. But anger doesn't help anything.
Agreed.
), but please don't go "downtown is gone, all is teh lost", or leave because I (or gogf) did. I've done what I was supposed to do here, now its your turn.
As you noted, you move on in life. Be it an internet forum or the mall or whatever other place you "hang out" people move forward in life and things change.