Patriotic_Fool
The Mitt ©
OOC alliance I say. Daedwartin and Austria both join and neither seem to have a neutral stance on the war affair, despite not being involved. Oh well, NOT MY PROBLEM NOW HAHAHHA!!
OOC alliance I say. Daedwartin and Austria both join and neither seem to have a neutral stance on the war affair, despite not being involved. Oh well, NOT MY PROBLEM NOW HAHAHHA!!
OOC alliance I say. Daedwartin and Austria both join and neither seem to have a neutral stance on the war affair, despite not being involved. Oh well, NOT MY PROBLEM NOW HAHAHHA!!
OOC alliance I say. Daedwartin and Austria both join and neither seem to have a neutral stance on the war affair, despite not being involved. Oh well, NOT MY PROBLEM NOW HAHAHHA!!
National Socialist German Worker's party.
Derp
Just because you have the same social policies does not mean you instantly ally and declare war.
I mean come on, look at history.
National Socialist German Worker's party.
Derp
Just because you have the same social policies does not mean you instantly ally and declare war.
I mean come on, look at history.
OOC: the Nazis are not socialists.
Hate to correct you, but Nazism did amongst its inconsistencies and strange logic paths, indeed contain socialist elements, and I would say they implemented particularly in the 30's many seemingly socialist policies. That said any study of nazism makes it clear that it was warped into a socialism of the "master race" rather than your run of the mill social democracy or the marxism of the university campus, things more familiar to a present day audience. Indeed to point out some examples of nazi socialists, Ernst Rohm head of the SA (and certain other Nazi's) held radically socialist anti-capitalist positions and Goebbels is on record as saying that in the final analysis it would be better to choose Bolshevism rather than live in "the eternal slavery" of a capitalist system.
PS: Don't tell me I'm wrong, because a) Im not, and b) I really don't want to have an annoying discussion, like one I had (to use an example) with a certain individual who doesn't study political theories like I do who seemed to think neoliberalism was actually conservatism, and that misapplications of terms was actually acceptable practice. (point being that the term socialism, is regularly misapplied nowadays, or shackled on to only one variant of the thing)
Now yes the Nazis were seeing themselves as alteratives to capitalists but anti-capitalist does not equal socialist
...appropriate debating form is not your strong point.
Principles of Tibetan Buddhism :
Suffering: The Buddha teaches that suffering is root cause of unhappiness in this world and that it is universal and unchangeable. Accepting harmony with the natural order as the highest good Tibetan Buddhism teaches that one must embrace suffering, become one with suffering and illuminate others as to the way of suffering and its purifying energy so that through suffering they may enter the second state of spiritual enlightenment. Despair.
Despair: The Buddha teaches that in this world, all are trapped in a cycle of birth and rebirth, and of never ending suffering and unjust torment for all eternity. Through becoming one with suffering Tibetan Buddhism teaches that one can enter into the state of despair, whereupon the soul is emptied of attachment to this world and desires escape to the ultimate end, oblivion
Oblivion: Also known as Nirvana, this is the final state every Buddhist seeks. Oblivion is the total destruction of the being, thus ending the cycle of birth and rebirth, and the torment of suffering. This can be achieved through subsuming oneself within suffering and by spreading understanding of suffering to others, whereupon one enters into the emptiness of despair losing spiritual attachment to the world, thus allowing the soul to cease to exist upon death and the cycle to end.
Imperial Germany is through. Who are you protecting? Scandinavia does not have any hostile tendencies towards any other nation. Peace is the most logical choice. Are you to carry out this war costing the lives of many of your people to fight a people that has no interest in invading you or are you going to allow the Scandinvians to keep the war torn state of Imperial Germany and rebuild it and have peace on this Earth.
Imperial Germany is through. Who are you protecting? Scandinavia does not have any hostile tendencies towards any other nation. Peace is the most logical choice. Are you to carry out this war costing the lives of many of your people to fight a people that has no interest in invading you or are you going to allow the Scandinvians to keep the war torn state of Imperial Germany and rebuild it and have peace on this Earth.