Communisto
Condottiere
if anything its not enough of a problem. We should have assigned designated sodomists patrolling the prison randomly penetrating inmates who arent careful. Prisons are too soft (hehe) on prisoners as is.
if anything its not enough of a problem. We should have assigned designated sodomists patrolling the prison randomly penetrating inmates who arent careful. Prisons are too soft (hehe) on prisoners as is.
It's not weird at all. The person on top is usually seen as dominant, and that's undeniably true in the case of rape; dominance is a prerequisite of rape. Exercising dominance is the very opposite of pansiness or effeminacy.That is the weirdest logic ever.
All I can say is that if I was ever sodomized the person responsible wouldn't be alive the next day.
It's not weird at all. The person on top is usually seen as dominant, and that's undeniably true in the case of rape; dominance is a prerequisite of rape. Exercising dominance is the very opposite of pansiness or effeminacy.
Remind me to kill you immediately afterwards if I ever sodomize you.
Y'know, normal people do not think that gay rape outside prison is pansy. Evil, immoral, icky, bestial, yes, but not pansy.I know that is their logic, it simply is not very consistent with my view of sexual relations. Rape is sex, no matter how you cut the cake. Man on man sex is gay sex, no matter how you cut the cake. Thus no matter your position, you are engaging in an act that two pansy homosexuals find pleasuring. You might view it as a sign of dominance personally as the sodomizer in the "man" position, but two homosexuals in the real world don't have that same logic, it is all sex to them. So why would these dominance-craving sodomist rapist prisoners jump to the conclusion that people would not hold views of what is true outside of prison? When I see you raping another guy, the first thing that comes to mind is you are a homosexual and have a fetish for gay sex. I wouldn't bother taking a poll to figure out your motives for f-ing another guy, i take it as how it looks. I would assume other prisoners would do the same.
Probably - malnutrition, disease, and beatings can put a severe damper on your sex drive, and are of differing prevalence in different countries' penal systems.
Y'know, normal people do not think that gay rape outside prison is pansy. Evil, immoral, icky, bestial, yes, but not pansy.
Hacking into a computer in prison would be considered kind of gay and make you a target. Throwing something at the guards would lose you a source of protection from the predators.hacking into the prison computer comes to mind, throwing your moldy prison-food jelly sandwich at the guard comes to mind,
This is rather like saying that because the stereotypical American is fat it follows that slim Americans are fat. Rape is about as unpansy as actions come.Really? I was under the impression that the stereotypical gay guy was quite the pansy, and thus gay rape being gay sex would make the two taking part in the act of rape pansies, if anything the guy being raped much less of one because he is not the one enjoying the act.
Who said that pleasure and dominance is an either-or affair?Because clearly, if the gay rapist was not gay and simply doing it for the supposed feeling of dominance, there must be more manly ways of conferring dominance that doesn't emulate two homosexuals (who happen to be stereotypically pansy) pleasuring each other. Punching the snot out of someone comes to mind, hacking into the prison computer comes to mind, throwing your moldy prison-food jelly sandwich at the guard comes to mind, doing 1000 push-ups comes to mind. Anything that does not emulate what two stereotypical homosexual pansies do.
Hacking into a computer in prison would be considered kind of gay and make you a target.
Throwing something at the guards would lose you a source of protection from the predators.
This is rather like saying that because the stereotypical American is fat it follows that slim Americans are fat. Rape is about as unpansy as actions come.
Who said that pleasure and dominance is an either-or affair?
Besides, hacking the system doesn't make you manly, it makes you a geek, and throwing a sandwich at the guard is puerile. 1k pushups is no fun, and while beating the snot out of someone is fine raping him is more fine.
You know, I've always thought that the toughest, manliest men would have to be gay.
Being a hetero male means you're admitting that you like soft round things and soft moist pink things, and womanly sounds and smells. That seems kinda pansy to me!
Whereas being gay means you like big hard things that can hurt you, and you like sweaty banging and grunting, which seems more manly. So the toughest of the tough would have to be gay, unless they just have sex with horses or brick walls or something.