Is prison rape a problem in other countries as it is in the US?

if anything its not enough of a problem. We should have assigned designated sodomists patrolling the prison randomly penetrating inmates who arent careful. Prisons are too soft (hehe) on prisoners as is.
 
if anything its not enough of a problem. We should have assigned designated sodomists patrolling the prison randomly penetrating inmates who arent careful. Prisons are too soft (hehe) on prisoners as is.

All I can say is that if I was ever sodomized the person responsible wouldn't be alive the next day.
 
That is the weirdest logic ever.
It's not weird at all. The person on top is usually seen as dominant, and that's undeniably true in the case of rape; dominance is a prerequisite of rape. Exercising dominance is the very opposite of pansiness or effeminacy.
 
It's not weird at all. The person on top is usually seen as dominant, and that's undeniably true in the case of rape; dominance is a prerequisite of rape. Exercising dominance is the very opposite of pansiness or effeminacy.

I know that is their logic, it simply is not very consistent with my view of sexual relations. Rape is sex, no matter how you cut the cake. Man on man sex is gay sex, no matter how you cut the cake. Thus no matter your position, you are engaging in an act that two pansy homosexuals find pleasuring. You might view it as a sign of dominance personally as the sodomizer in the "man" position, but two homosexuals in the real world don't have that same logic, it is all sex to them. So why would these dominance-craving sodomist rapist prisoners jump to the conclusion that people would not hold views of what is true outside of prison? When I see you raping another guy, the first thing that comes to mind is you are a homosexual and have a fetish for gay sex. I wouldn't bother taking a poll to figure out your motives for f-ing another guy, i take it as how it looks. I would assume other prisoners would do the same.

Remind me to kill you immediately afterwards if I ever sodomize you.

I sure will! :)
 
I know that is their logic, it simply is not very consistent with my view of sexual relations. Rape is sex, no matter how you cut the cake. Man on man sex is gay sex, no matter how you cut the cake. Thus no matter your position, you are engaging in an act that two pansy homosexuals find pleasuring. You might view it as a sign of dominance personally as the sodomizer in the "man" position, but two homosexuals in the real world don't have that same logic, it is all sex to them. So why would these dominance-craving sodomist rapist prisoners jump to the conclusion that people would not hold views of what is true outside of prison? When I see you raping another guy, the first thing that comes to mind is you are a homosexual and have a fetish for gay sex. I wouldn't bother taking a poll to figure out your motives for f-ing another guy, i take it as how it looks. I would assume other prisoners would do the same.
Y'know, normal people do not think that gay rape outside prison is pansy. Evil, immoral, icky, bestial, yes, but not pansy.
 
Y'know, normal people do not think that gay rape outside prison is pansy. Evil, immoral, icky, bestial, yes, but not pansy.

Really? I was under the impression that the stereotypical gay guy was quite the pansy, and thus gay rape being gay sex would make the two taking part in the act of rape pansies, if anything the guy being raped much less of one because he is not the one enjoying the act.

Because clearly, if the gay rapist was not gay and simply doing it for the supposed feeling of dominance, there must be more manly ways of conferring dominance that doesn't emulate two homosexuals (who happen to be stereotypically pansy) pleasuring each other. Punching the snot out of someone comes to mind, hacking into the prison computer comes to mind, throwing your moldy prison-food jelly sandwich at the guard comes to mind, doing 1000 push-ups comes to mind. Anything that does not emulate what two stereotypical homosexual pansies do.
 
hacking into the prison computer comes to mind, throwing your moldy prison-food jelly sandwich at the guard comes to mind,
Hacking into a computer in prison would be considered kind of gay and make you a target. Throwing something at the guards would lose you a source of protection from the predators.
 
I've heard (don't remember where) that approximately 25% of prisoners experience prison rape, so it might not be a high as people tend to think.

I would also suspect that in America, the race issue could lead to a higher incidence of rape, because there are more power struggles between racial groups and a greater sense of tribalism among the prisoners.
 
Prison rape is definitely a problem in prisons everywhere, worldwide. We just don't hear about it.

When one of those Police Chases TV shows diversified and did some clips from other nations, I was rather surprised to see police chases (and standoffs and shootouts and such) occurring in places you'd never expect. Happens everywhere. It's just that the U.S. gets singled out for special abuse, just as a Nice Guy generally will. When a Nice Guy does something wrong, EVERYBODY notices.
 
Really? I was under the impression that the stereotypical gay guy was quite the pansy, and thus gay rape being gay sex would make the two taking part in the act of rape pansies, if anything the guy being raped much less of one because he is not the one enjoying the act.
This is rather like saying that because the stereotypical American is fat it follows that slim Americans are fat. Rape is about as unpansy as actions come.
Because clearly, if the gay rapist was not gay and simply doing it for the supposed feeling of dominance, there must be more manly ways of conferring dominance that doesn't emulate two homosexuals (who happen to be stereotypically pansy) pleasuring each other. Punching the snot out of someone comes to mind, hacking into the prison computer comes to mind, throwing your moldy prison-food jelly sandwich at the guard comes to mind, doing 1000 push-ups comes to mind. Anything that does not emulate what two stereotypical homosexual pansies do.
Who said that pleasure and dominance is an either-or affair?

Besides, hacking the system doesn't make you manly, it makes you a geek, and throwing a sandwich at the guard is puerile. 1k pushups is no fun, and while beating the snot out of someone is fine raping him is more fine.
 
Hacking into a computer in prison would be considered kind of gay and make you a target.

I'll keep this in mind.

Throwing something at the guards would lose you a source of protection from the predators.

Or it might provoke them to say something along the lines of "I think you dropped your jelly sandwich..." and then the rest becomes sodomy history.
 
This is rather like saying that because the stereotypical American is fat it follows that slim Americans are fat. Rape is about as unpansy as actions come.

Maybe I just have very unpopular criteria for manliness.

Who said that pleasure and dominance is an either-or affair?

Besides, hacking the system doesn't make you manly, it makes you a geek, and throwing a sandwich at the guard is puerile. 1k pushups is no fun, and while beating the snot out of someone is fine raping him is more fine.

Well I guess pleasure and dominance could go hand-in-hand simultaneously, but that would still leave me believing, upon observing gay rape, that somebody is doing it for the pleasure, and thus is gay. And if the stereotype follows, this guy must be pansy.
 
You know, I've always thought that the toughest, manliest men would have to be gay.

Being a hetero male means you're admitting that you like soft round things and soft moist pink things, and womanly sounds and smells. That seems kinda pansy to me!

Whereas being gay means you like big hard things that can hurt you, and you like sweaty banging and grunting, which seems more manly. So the toughest of the tough would have to be gay, unless they just have sex with horses or brick walls or something.
 
You know, I've always thought that the toughest, manliest men would have to be gay.

Being a hetero male means you're admitting that you like soft round things and soft moist pink things, and womanly sounds and smells. That seems kinda pansy to me!

Whereas being gay means you like big hard things that can hurt you, and you like sweaty banging and grunting, which seems more manly. So the toughest of the tough would have to be gay, unless they just have sex with horses or brick walls or something.

But then the worrying over whether your wallpaper matches your carpet, or if you should go with the suade shoes or the crocodile leather shoes kinda ruins it. By that logic all women are tougher than men, which has yet to be proven as an overall generalization.
 
Back
Top Bottom