blitzkrieg1980 said:
True, Wodan. You are right. Sorry. He is just very insulting and, in my opinion, quite ignorant. But I concede. I must chill out
I run into that sometimes too. I guess I feel that when I think the other guys is insulting and/or ignorant, that precisely when it's more important for
me to keep my cool and stay rational. Was a hard lesson for me to learn but I'm much better at it now than a few years ago.
One thing you can always do is ask for supporting evidence. People tend to make a blanket statement, you know, a sweeping conclusion without any stated logical basis. Just ask them to back it up, and leave it at that.
Okay, enough pedantic advice. Back to the flame war at hand.
Abegweit said:
True. But only if you win. All sides killed by the million: Germans, Russians, Japanese, Brits, Americans and both Chinese factions. But the crimes of the Nazis are endlessly paraded in front of us and those of Tojo come up too (although Hirohito is curiously exempt from criticism). In contrast, those of the Russians and Chinese are largely forgotten while, as we see here, those of the Americans and the British are even lauded.
I don't disagree. I think we all have ghosts in the closet. On the other hand, I think there is much to find admirable in all peoples and cultures. Wouldn't it be nice if we could take the good that each culture has to offer, leave the bad where it belongs in the past, and become a world with a lot better prospects and future.
Sometimes I get annoyed with the baggage that people carry around. Like the German pathological aversion to anything having anything to do with Hitler. Or American blacks playing the racist card on the slightest provocation, when there was nothing racist having to do with it. The baggage just propagates the problem in an opposite, but equally negative way.
Abegweit said:
My apologies. You are right.
No worries.
aelf said:
Appeasement does not work. Maybe that's propaganda, but not all propaganda are false. Going by the pacifist logic flying around here, if North Korea nukes and invades South Korea, the moral thing for Americans to do is sit by and watch. Why participate and do evil things like kill people? It's none of your business anyway. Let the Koreans kill each other on their own, there will be fewer people dead that way.
I totally agree. That's moral decay, not moral courage.
Abegweit said:
Let's follow this, shall we? There are more than a million men facing each other across the DMZ. Of these 30,000 are American. Do you honestly believe that they have the slightest impact, other than to exacerbate relations between the two Koreas?
I think he was saying that the south is a joint military force, including US troops. If the south is attacked, then the US is attacked. This has no relation to how much the US presence adds to the south's combat power.
Abegweit said:
South Korea has twice the population and fifty times the GDP of the North. Do you honestly believe that they are incapable of defending themselves?
The Americans should leave Korea and go home, just as they should leave Germany and Japan. These countries, especially Korea, do not want or need American military "aid". They are quite capable of defending themselves.
The reason America has bases all over the world is to have advance staging areas in the event of a future conflict. It doesn't really have anything to do with "protecting" our allies, not any more. As you say, almost all of them don't need or want it, and I agree with you there.
Abegweit said:
In any war between the two, the North would rapidly and decisively lose. Of course, Seoul would be annilated in the process (more from the thousands of artillery aimed at it than from whatever unreliable nuclear weapons Kim Jong-il may have). But the North would lose and the Dear Leader would be hanged for his crimes. What's more, he knows it.
Are you implying he won't go to war because he knows he'll lose? Doesn't that assume he thinks and acts in accordance to what
we think is rational?
Well... History has shown that leaders
aren't and
don't (especially military dictators or religious leaders).
Heck, he probably thinks the same thing about America (that we aren't rational).
Wodan