It's About to Get Hot at the Border

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is that tim-code for you'd kick their ass for being a dick?
 
Oh, Tim. They're very nice.
 
Is that tim-code for you'd kick their ass for being a dick?

Nahhh. I'd play it by ear in the moment. Being mostly belligerent myself, I tend to give belligerent people a fair amount of leeway before leaping to the conclusion that ass kicking is in order.
 
I found a clip of that first. Didn't feel like linking the connotations to that one. Very bloody.
 
Yar. Not what I was expecting from top link!
 
Yar. Not what I was expecting from top link!

I hesitate to ask this, but what did you use for a search string, and have you considered the long term consequences in regards to what kind of ads you have invited into your browser?
 
I clear my cookies when I get bored by the algorithm. Big dog testicles seems to trend towards veterinary interests by default. At least on Youtube.
 
I'm gonna guess that outside of YouTube your mileage may vary there.
 
I got a wrong number call from a wedding agency on the Gold Coast the other day. I googled the number to find out who was calling. I have received approximately ten billion ads for weddings and/or the Gold Coast since. Be grateful you're getting veterinary stuff.
 
@Hygro He went off the air in the 21st. Whether or not you want to include him, the kids that grew up with him are going to be voting for a long time. The TV and news you all are watching now sucks ass. Twitter news is cancerous, from what I can gather. But hey, it's election season, not everyone hangs up on landline political calls 4 times a day. But we are not gone.
Re-run Republicans vote Democratic.
 
Depends. Jesse White seems an effective and admirable longstanding civil servant. I like that congressman to the east who the Republicans don't oppose and the idiot nazi guy snuck in when they weren't paying attention. I'd probably vote for him. But no, they're still Republicans. Bear in mind, I vote against Assclown twice everytime a member of the Democrat Party in my state does once. Oh well. Looks like we're getting "just barely not locked up" for governor next year! Otherwise I'd vote for the Democrat for Comptroller, seems alright. But I generally think Governor and Comptroller should be adversarial, so will probably vote R on that one. Not to be taken as endorsements in the upcoming election.
 
Last edited:
Calling these caravan people "asylum seekers" is NONSENSE, it's watering down the concept and cheapening what it is to actually be seeking asylum. If we were to accept asylum seekers simply for economic reasons and the sad events surrounding economic reasons, we'd might as well LITERALLY START ACCEPTING HALF THE WORLD.

There is not government or otherwise institutional action against these people seeking their deaths for the way they "are" , the way they worship , the way they love. I don't have to go on. Absolutely zero of this is an asylum issue, and to say it is confounds the intent of asylum rules and complicates/slows down the process in red tape of legitimate asylum seekers. This is a political stunt and a joke.
 
Calling these caravan people "asylum seekers" is NONSENSE, it's watering down the concept and cheapening what it is to actually be seeking asylum. If we were to accept asylum seekers simply for economic reasons and the sad events surrounding economic reasons, we'd might as well LITERALLY START ACCEPTING HALF THE WORLD.

There is not government or otherwise institutional action against these people seeking their deaths for the way they "are" , the way they worship , the way they love. I don't have to go on. Absolutely zero of this is an asylum issue, and to say it is confounds the intent of asylum rules and complicates/slows down the process in red tape of legitimate asylum seekers. This is a political stunt and a joke.
You're right. Large caravans of people traverse continents in order to score cheap political points against political parties at their destination point. That's just common sense.

"Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free...so long as they are white and vote Republican."
 
You're right. Large caravans of people traverse continents in order to score cheap political points against political parties at their destination point. That's just common sense.

"Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free...so long as they are white and vote Republican."

That's a poem. That is not international law. You're being willfully ignorant and the fact you have to throw "Republican" in there shows it's politically motivated while my statement is lawful fact.

Shame on you.
 
This is a political stunt and a joke.

Indeed. The whole "It's an invasion!!! :aargh: Send troops to the border!!! :run: Fire at will!!! :ar15:" bit is nothing but a lame political stunt by the clown in chief to fire up the hideous and deplorable buffoons who swallow his nonsense. Since we are all in agreemant about that I don't see your point.
 
This is a political stunt and a joke.
Agreed. Even the military thinks it is a waste of resources and is more worried about the militias and their propensity to steal from the military rather than the trickle of the caravan that will actually make it to our border.

From the papers, the military is preparing to defend against an “estimated 200 unregulated armed militia members currently operating along the [Southwest Border]. Reported Incidents of unregulated militias stealing National Guard equipment during deployments. They operate under the guise of citizen patrols supporting [Customs and Border Patrol] primarily between [Points of Entry].”

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/...their-gear-protester-violence-documents-show/
 
That's a poem. That is not international law. You're being willfully ignorant and the fact you have to throw "Republican" in there shows it's politically motivated while my statement is lawful fact.

Shame on you.
Under the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, these people have every right, under international law, to seek asylum. Now, it is true that they may not qualify for asylum, but that is something that needs to be determined after they apply for asylum. In other words, your statement is lawful fiction.

And yes, my statement was politically motivated. Good on you for noticing. I have this weird thing where I don't like political parties that practice racism, pursue anti-democratic policies, and set up concentration camps for minority groups. I'm afraid I'm just wired that way.

I also note your complete failure to acknowledge my first paragraph, pointing out the manifest idiocy of your original statement. I accept your concession.
 
There's not racism. That's a false accusation, all you can reach for as your argument is faltering and failing and falling and falling and falling and...

"OH YA! WELL because my argument sucks, YOU'RE A RACIST! YA! YOU HATE SPANISH SPEAKING PEOPLE BECAUSE THAT'S A RACE!"

Come on, dude. Grow up.

"Now, it is true that they may not qualify for asylum"

This is already your concession. It's the best and most honest thing you said there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom