FriendlyFire
Codex WMDicanious
That's a strawman. Mexico has already given them asylum. But, you knew that.
Dont worry just put all the children in cages
Problem SOLVED !
That's a strawman. Mexico has already given them asylum. But, you knew that.
This is how we create the next generation of wrestling superstars. Trump can throw McMahon a bone.Dont worry just put all the children in cages
Problem SOLVED !
I'm not certain what the outcome of this will be but I do know that if the militias start shooting people Trump will blame CNN for inciting violence. Though he wouldn't be completely wrong - it is CNN et al that carry his non-stop calls to violence and characterization of the migrants as ISIS sleeper agents and rapists.
Yes, he would be completely wrong. It is news (in fact big news) when a US president actively stokes stokes nationalist animosities, and CNN's job is to report the news. They would be remiss not to report on that.Though he wouldn't be completely wrong
To be fair, if the media had ignored Captain Dingbat from the beginning he'd be wallowing in well-deserved obscurity.Yes, he would be completely wrong. It is news (in fact big news) when a US president actively stokes stokes nationalist animosities, and CNN's job is to report the news. They would be remiss not to report on that.
He is utterly to blame for doing so, not them for covering it.
I don't disagree with all of the above I am just shining a light on our media's obsession with everything Trump says and tweets to the detriment of our political system. I also do not give the media a pass because while they sometimes push back against his lies more often they just report what he says without qualifier. Even when they give a qualifier it's ineffective as his base is willfully ignorant of his various trespasses against fact-based reality.
That's the strawman. What does Mexico granting asylum have to do with @Commodore 's question about whether a violent conflict at the border will happen or not?... seems like nothing... so in other words... a strawman.Mexico has already given them asylum.
That's the strawman. What does Mexico granting asylum have to do with @Commodore 's question about whether a violent conflict at the border will happen or not?... seems like nothing... so in other words... a strawman.
Fair enough... But what about my point that the folks going into detention at the border alleviates the need for any bloodbath at the hand of militias, Mexican police or otherwise?More like a thread derailing red herring, which was obvious as soon as you saw who posted it. I was hoping that
A) no one would respond
B) he would just go troll somewhere else
My point in bringing up whether they are seeking asylum here is that if they are indeed planning to turn themselves over and request asylum,
they sometimes push back against his lies
Even when they give a qualifier it's ineffective as his base is willfully ignorant of his various trespasses against fact-based reality.
Fair enough... But what about my point that the folks going into detention at the border alleviates the need for any bloodbath at the hand of militias, Mexican police or otherwise?
The thing about that is, then they'd have to consider actually going into Mexico to intercept the caravan before it gets to the US Border agents. If they stay on our side then they are going to get treated to a guy on a bullhorn shouting "We will be taking the migrants into custody upon entry! Your assistance is not required! Please refrain from interfering or you will be arrested and charged with a federal crime!" I'm guessing hearing that is going to cause the majority of the folks who are there mostly for show to back down... which will in turn possibly domino into making the more zealous ones back down.That's where the potential for conflict is though. These militias might try to stop them from turning themselves over in the first place. Might even be a few that would be crazy enough to actually attack any Border Patrol facilities attempting to process the migrants.
They do not need to give wall to wall coverage of every inane thing he puts out there, much less the veritable mountain of horsepoop and lies he peddles.They can't do anything about that other than continuing to put out the facts as well as they can establish them.
Aren't the caravan folks seeking asylum? Isn't their plan to present themselves at the border precisely to be taken into custody so they can make a formal asylum request? I don't think they are traveling in a huge caravan of hundreds of folks with any realistic hope of "sneaking" across the border. Seems like a formal asylum request has to be their plan.
Of course going into Mexico risks getting into a shootout with Mexican authorities... which... I'm not convinced that folks threatening a caravan of unarmed civilians including children is looking to face off with a comparably armed/trained force. Their whole posture seems to be on the bully'ish side, so I'm skeptical they want to shoot at fish that shoot back.