Kittens or Bunnies, which would you save?

Archbob

Ancient CFC Guardian
Joined
Oct 25, 2000
Messages
11,776
Location
Corporate USA
So if you had a choice of saving all the Kittens in the world or all the Bunnies in the world. which would you save?

If you pick Kittens then all the Bunnies in the world will immediately explode in a bunny genocide.

If you pick bunnies than all the kittens in the world will explode in a kitten bloodbath.

Which will it be?
 
Save the kittens!!!
 
So if you had a choice of saving all the Kittens in the world or all the Bunnies in the world. which would you save?

If you pick Kittens then all the Bunnies in the world will immediately explode in a bunny genocide.

If you pick bunnies than all the kittens in the world will explode in a kitten bloodbath.

Which will it be?

If I had that choice I would question and view whoever gave me that choice as psychopatic and also I would enquire after the source of the power which could bring about the kind of massacre you are describing and use that power to control any potentional source giving out simmilar 'factual' choices.
 
Domesticated bunnies, wild bunnies, or both?

If the first, save kittens, if the second or third, save bunnies.

Cats are not good for the environment, and it's unclear how eradicating all wild rabbits from the world would impact food webs, it probably wouldn't be good for foxes and raptors, for example.
 
silver-tabby-maine-coon-kitten.jpg


yes, kittens.
 
My fiance would never ever forgive me for saving the rabbits and not the kittens.

Added bonus: all the rabbits exploding would solve Australia's most ecologically destructive pest instantly.
 
Kittens, because they kill the predator of humans, rats who carry the plague.

You ever heard of a bunny who helped humanity like that? NOPE!
 
Rabbit is damn tasty. Cat on the other hand, well, never tried it. So I guess I'll stick with what I know and save the bunnies so I can continue to eat them.
 
My thinking is the same as Owen's except I'd keep the rabbits either way

why didn't you make a poll?
 
I would save the nugs, obviously.
 
Bunnies provide an important enough part of the ecosystem in many places around the world, while domesticated kittens just take up space.

Killing all bunnies could have unforeseen consequences to other species and could lead to extinctions, while cats are jerks. So, screw the cats, as cute as they might be.
 
Will I get 18 billion dollars if I decide to save none?

If not... well, obviously the bunnies. Kittens just do nothing but eat food that uses resources that we could use otherwise.
 
Save the kittens. As someone who like gardening, rabbits are pernicious pests who would just as soon eat you out of house and home as look at you. Voracious varmints who eat everything in sight, then reproduce like salmonella on a room temperature chicken breast.

Screw rabbits, they should all be eaten.
 
As someone who like gardening, rabbits are pernicious pests who would just as soon eat you out of house and home as look at you. Voracious varmints who eat everything in sight, then reproduce like salmonella on a room temperature chicken breast.
Okay, so I approach this from two directions. On the one hand: rabbits do eat everything and breed everywhere, and as far as farms go they're only slightly less obnoxious than the hated groundhogs and skunks. On the other hand: kids love bunnies, which is a fairly big plus in the agritourism business.
 
Kids also love kittens though, so I think that's a wash in terms of this choice ;).
 
But what do the Kitty Deities have to say?
 
Back
Top Bottom