PhoenicianGold
Emperor
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2018
- Messages
- 1,828
Did the civilopedia leak include the palace leak for Scotland in the assets? Or was that something different?
No, this was before the base game was released.Did the civilopedia leak include the palace leak for Scotland in the assets? Or was that something different?
Me too.I was thinking of making similar thread, lol.
Also I don't think I've seen the old livestream where they accidently showed civs for R&F. Does anyone remember which one was it? I'd love to watch it - just for their reactions alone.
You don't have to make an active effort to not want something to happen to not want something to happen intentionally. What on earth did I just write...?Is it intentional if they don't make an active effort NOT to leak, even though they generally try not to?
I was thinking of making similar thread, lol.
Also I don't think I've seen the old livestream where they accidently showed civs for R&F. Does anyone remember which one was it? I'd love to watch it - just for their reactions alone.
Me too.
The live stream doesn't appear... They must have taken it down. Oh, snap.I can give a link to the corresponding thread, with a link to a video on a Chinese site. But the video, I couldn't open it, and my chinese isn't good to understand why. So here is the thread:
https://forums.civfanatics.com/thre...ay-aug-18-2pm-et.573016/page-16#post-14407468
I can give a link to the corresponding thread, with a link to a video on a Chinese site. But the video, I couldn't open it, and my chinese isn't good to understand why. So here is the thread:
https://forums.civfanatics.com/thre...ay-aug-18-2pm-et.573016/page-16#post-14407468
The live stream doesn't appear... They must have taken it down. Oh, snap.
Indeed, I did say that.The webpage just says "This video doesn't exist anymore" (the Chinese way of implying something being taken down from the Internet).
Not if I have anything to say about it22 yes, 22 no, and 13 neutral. Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
What do you mean? It's still perfectly balanced: 23 say yes, 23 say no, and 17 are neutral.Not if I have anything to say about it
This thread is a result of this one:For some reason, I thought I was going to find out some info on future CIV6 content in this thread...