Love and Infatuation

PlutonianEmpire

King of the Plutonian Empire
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
4,815
Location
MinneSNOWta
What is love? What is infatuation?

To tell you the truth: I don't really know. No one does. But this is my interpretation of it.

Love is reciprocal. I love you, you love me. Infatuation can also be reciprocal: I can't live without you, you can't live without me.

Love is when you both know you like each other, and that you two are attracted to each other, in every way, shape, and form, on the physical level, AND the spiritual level. You also love, on occasion, the smallest thing about the other person.

Love also includes respect. Respect for the other's belief systems. Respect for the path they have chosen in life, but if he/she chose to be the next Adolf Hitler, that's a whole other story (not very many people would want to go out with a mass-murderer). You also don't try to change their ways.

In a family, when all loves one another, they all care for each other, they all help the other when he/she is in need, etc.

Infatuation? Sex, sex, SEX! [pimp] Physical pleasure with little or no strings attached. But not always, for to some couples, it can all be just some game of sorts, where they sort of "act it out" with no real meaning. Think of "Romeo and Juliet." Their families hated each other, but Romeo and Juliet went out with each other behind the families back. Sounds like love, right? Maybe, but not if they commit suicide simply because they don't want to live without the significant other.

"Crushes" can be a form of infatuation. groucho So does "falling" in love. If you let yourself fall in love, don't forget to bring a flashlight, 'cause it's gonna be a long way down... :p

On occasion, infatuation can lead to more than just suicide. It can lead to the deaths of children. Yes, children. Including the unborn. How would it include the unborn. Let's say that there's a man and a very pregnant wife, but the wife and the child have a good chance of dying if something's not done. The wife is on the hospital bed, unconsious, dying, along with the about-to-be-born child. The man is unwilling to let the wife go, and chooses her over the child. Wife gives birth, but the child dies. Clearly this is a form of infatuation. Why? One unnamed CFC'er told me that if this situation happened, he would immediately choose the wife over the possibility of a child growing up to have its own spouse and kids, education, job, etc., because he would "miss her too damn much." If you miss the other person more than anything, and I mean ANYTHING, in the universe, and would go as far as to neglect your children, family, friends, that's infatuation. Lethal infatuation. :ninja:

So that is my interpretation of Love and Infatuation. :wavey:


What about me? :bump: I'm single, so I don't have to worry about this. Plus, I'm 19 with braces, hearing loss, and a desire to be the leader of the entire Universe, so it's not like I'll meet "Queen Right" anytime soon. ;)
 
Humans have chemical reactions and make up flowery concepts to describe them.

...
 
I believe the primary difference between Love and Infatuation is actually rather simple.

Infatuation is very selfish. It is a state of Craving, of Desiring, of Wanting to gratify one's need for attention and affection.

Love is very selfless. It is all about Giving without any expectations. And when it is returned, it is infinitely superior to any temporary 'fix' provided by a satisfied infatuation. :)



-Elgalad
 
Love is what remains after infactuation is gone.

Yes, you can have both. But one is definately better than the other.
 
Heh, only chemistry? What else is there?

In the words the Poet:
O! be some other name:
What’s in a name? that which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet;
So Romeo would, were he not Romeo call’d,
Retain that dear perfection which he owes
Without that title.

As far as the difference, I think Egalad hit the nail on the head.
Love is selfless towards its object, infatuation is a selfish need for gratification.
 
Infatuation is when our unconsious finds all the right signals in a potential mate that that person is a good match for our genes. Our unconsious picks up on things such as smell, face structure, skin, hair, lips, butt, chest etc.. that give us information on that person's immune system and genes. Also I believe the same process happens with personality. We find people that would be a good fit for us in raising children. In this aspect I think we do go after someone similar to our father/mother. Infatuation then lasts for 2-3 years giving us enough time to have offspring and get the offspring through the first few years.

When you are talking about love I assume you are talking about the kind of love in a marriage, not love between brothers. Love starts with infatuation but involves a commitment. When we are infatuated with someone we are in love with them. But that infatuation is bound to wear off. If you have built a healthy relationship and are committed to each other, you will stay together even after infatuation (the honeymoon period) ends. For many people there lacks a commitment or there are compatibility issues that arise. In these cases when infatuation ends the relationship often ends. This is why many relationships often don't last longer then 2-3 years.

I believe that it is optimal for people to be in a realtionship for 2-3 years before commiting to marriage. Because it's after the infatuation ends that we are able to make a sober commitment.
 
@andrewgprv: Your first paragraph seems to imply that infatuation is purely a evolutionary response to reproductive needs while your second paragraph seems to imply that love is something more transcedental.

I am not sure. The commitment that you talk about in the second paragraph may also be (and most probably is) a evolutionary response to the fact that human children have extended weaning periods and childhoods (in most cases much longer than 2-3 years).

I am with Gothmog. It's all chemistry. What else is there?
 
CurtSibling said:
Humans have chemical reactions and make up flowery concepts to describe them.
...
Humans have chemical reactions and make flower children ;)

As for love to be a total attraction on the physical-aetherial-mental-karmic level... well, that asks quite a lot from love. When in doubt, go for infatuation :)
 
CurtSibling said:
Humans have chemical reactions and make up flowery concepts to describe them.

...

This has reveled that you sir are an Alien...that is not the true meaning of love, what you described there is just what the media and cinema want you to know! :p
 
I am both 19 and have a desire to be the leader of the entire Universe, and I am in love (been with my girlfriend for comign up to 2 years....which is along time for someone my age!).
 
Some things can be described over and over, justly, poetically, crudely, figuratively or whatever - but never communicate the true feeling. Kind of like the difference between knowing the road and walking it.

Two things that I know off hand that I could never have begun to understand until I experienced them were depression and love.
 
I don't think love is a feeling. It is action. Growing up w/o a dad showed me this. His lack of action=lack of love. My mother on the other hand had feet to her march. Hmm, we need a mom smiley.
 
Mmm, nope. Actions are common ways to describe love, but it is a feeling.
 
CurtSibling said:
Humans have chemical reactions and make up flowery concepts to describe them....
Clearly, Curt you've never been in love.;)
 
Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil, but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. Love never fails.
 
Love is that hot stuff that spews out of volcanoes. Infatuation is the process of purposefully gaining weight through fatty foods.

I hope this clears up a little confusion.
 
it's all just chemical reactions in the brain. That said enjoy the feeling, but there is no sense in denying that it's all just a chemical reation.
 
Back
Top Bottom