The United States of America would like to defend itself against charges of militarism by its southern neighbor, Mexico.
How can Mexico call us militaristic when it has invaded three nations in the past two years? Surely this is a case of the pot calling the kettle black.
We did not want to go to war. Yet, because of the defense treaty we signed with Britain against Japanese aggression, we were forced to. There is a difference.
Those three nations, and the conspiracy that controls them, have continually worked to subvert Mexican democracy and encourage the violent overthrow of our government. Where this Workers' Party comes to power, it oppresses its population, strips the republic whose institutions it manipulated of its resources, and uses them to fund banditry and terrorism within Mexico.
Peaceful alternatives, pursued ever since the Workers Regime had started funding desperados in Nuevo Mexico, had been exhausted, with no change in policy south of the border. Only the deployment of the Mexican army to seal that border resulted in any real effect. Still, the Nicaraguans worked to cooperate with domestic elements to prepare the violent toppling of the elected government. With the spread of Communist influence across the Gulf, we were faced with the very real possibility of having to seal our borders against many of our neighbors, aswell as the continuing threat that the Workers Party could cripple Mexican trade by closing the Nicaraguan Canal. And, while this went on, refugees and political dissidents escaped northward in greater and greater numbers.
Faced with the oppression of the Workers Party at home, and its willingness to work to spread its deranged ideology abroad into Mexico, America, and the rest of Latin America, Mexico reciprocated by funding Anti-Communist elements in the deformed states, ironically composed of the "counterrevolutionary" refugees that had been persecuted by the regimes.
Mexican intelligence, shortly before the invasion, uncovered a plot with domestic industrialists that had been corrupted by the promise of absolute power over the lives of millions of their fellow Mexicans, which involved the funding of a private mercenary army in Mexico by the Workers Party, and other foreign nations, and strikes on the Panama and Nicaraguan Canals to close them to trade and commerce, in order to provoke an economic crisis that would pave the way for their misguided Revolution.
How could we have done anything different, than to liberate the oppressed and unfortunate and preserve safety and liberty in the homeland? And, by implication, saved America's political and economic stability?
