aelf
Ashen One
I beg to differ. At least when those practices are not merely "backward", but potentially violent as well.
Well, it's not. Also, even if it was, did you really want to say what you just did?![]()
What I meant was with respect to letting such people in. If they keep their practices within the home, who belonging to the host culture would it harm? If they were not to be allowed in, they would do it as well. At least there might be some pressure to change if they were allowed in.
Yeekim said:You might say the same after burning down your house and gambling away your savings; doesn't mean it is a smart idea. Besides, first law of nature: things can always get worse.
I have no idea what this is supposed to mean in response to what I said.
Yeekim said:Would you classify general disgruntlement of people that has lead to notable revival of "far-right" parties in Europe as "success"? And that is not taking into account people who would never vote for such party - if only not to get behind the same table with skinhead-high-school-dropouts - but still think there are legitimate concerns (that's me)? That is definitely a failure for politicians who have promoted "multiculturalism" and who obviously feel they are losing support.
EDIT: Luckily, thanks to our pathetic-in-comparison-with-Scandinavia welfare system and abominable weather, immigrants are no hot topic in Estonia. So "that's me" should be read "that probably was me if I lived in France/UK/Netherlands etc".
So? These people are merely bigots. Even if they aren't really bigots, that has no bearing on the success/failure of multiculturalism. The failure is not that of multiculturalism, but that of the host country.