Hey, Diamondeye, I know you totally have m-NotW II practically planned out, but if you're amenable to the idea, I'd like to run the next game in this series. I have a gameplay mechanic I want to try out...
I have an idea to host one too. So the order is...Gah... If you don't mind I'd rather run the second, I was thinking this from the start that after the first couple I would find others to run the next ones (since I will be largely inactive in the summer holiday)... And as you say, I am almost done writing m-Notw II (need two characters - there's going to be 18 this time around), so I'd rather run mine first. Can't stop you from starting up yours of course, but I'd prefer it if only one of them ran at a time, and I'd honestly prefer to run mine first - then you are fully welcome to run yours so I can dedicate some time to my real notw (and my exams )...
Book-ish name!Fine, you can keep your stupid monopoly down, but by God I will break it in m-NotW3 if I have to call in the SEC to do it.
I haven't decided what I'll call mine.
Woo Hoo!Upon thinking about it a little more, I decided to be uncharacteristically nice and acquiesce to CCRunner's request.
I shall GM m-NotWIII: A Game of Thrones.
It doesn't make sense to choose a random book title just for the sake of it. But if it's a cool name which fits the concept perfectly, then I fail to see any problem.Guys, can I just say the naming the games after book titles thing is a really lame idea.
It doesn't make sense to choose a random book title just for the sake of it. But if it's a cool name which fits the concept perfectly, then I fail to see any problem.
Since it was deleted before I had a chance to read it, I'll have to take your word on that.As in my "Name of the Rose"
SpoilsportGuys, can I just say the naming the games after book titles thing is a really lame idea.