missing dog found beheaded :(

No using an animal for food is fine, if that's what they are intended for. Taking somebodies dog that they care about, beheading it and giving it to them in a package is not something a normal person does.

It was an attempt to defeat one more branch of aforementioned frothing ;)
 
general right and wrong? are you saying there is some universal set of ethics?

No, I am simply getting the idea that you would like to see dog eating abolished because it does not fit your morals.
 
No, I am simply getting the idea that you would like to see dog eating abolished because it does not fit your morals.

Yup. But isn't that kind of a weak arguement? I can assume you'd want child raping and other such horrible acts abolished because it doesn't fit your set of morals?
 
Yup. But isn't that kind of a weak arguement? I can assume you'd want child raping and other such horrible acts abolished because it doesn't fit your set of morals?

  • Dogs are not humans
  • Dogs to be eaten are usually slaughtered in a somewhat painless manner
  • Dogs cannot feel the emotional distress of having been raped
 
  • Dogs are not humans
  • Dogs to be eaten are usually slaughtered in a somewhat painless manner
  • Dogs cannot feel the emotional distress of having been raped

I wasnt equating eating a dog to child raping, i was stating that the only reason you think child raping should be abolished is because it goes against your morals (as it would with any sane person), same logic with me being against dog eating.
 
I wasnt equating eating a dog to child raping, i was stating that the only reason you think child raping should be abolished is because it goes against your morals (as it would with any sane person), same logic with me being against dog eating.

However, child rape is condemned by a vast majority, and AFAIK is illegal in all countries. Dog eating is neither, which leaves it an open field.
 
However, child rape is condemned by a vast majority, and AFAIK is illegal in all countries. Dog eating is neither, which leaves it an open field.

so? I've still proved myself right. You say it's alright to eat dogs and I say it isn't. both our opinions are based on our own set of personal morals. It seems to me that youre implying that the only course of action is to deem acceptable whatever the majority of the population deems acceptable and normal and base your morals around those of the people around you, which is a dangerous way of thinking.
 
However, child rape is condemned by a vast majority, and AFAIK is illegal in all countries. Dog eating is neither, which leaves it an open field.

Funny how your sense of morality sounds a lot like peer pressure.
 
One's own experiences and values are built around one's environment.
 
One's own experiences and values are built around one's environment.

there's a difference between being based and being complete copies. My values could be completely different than say my brother's who has had the same environment as me. You're saying that morality should be dictated by the values and opinions of the majority. If what you say is true, then my brother should be exactly like me in personality.
 
there's a difference between being based and being complete copies. My values could be completely different than say my brother's who has had the same environment as me. You're saying that morality should be dictated by the values and opinions of the majority. If what you say is true, then my brother should be exactly like me in personality.

And at the base levels, like when speaking about child rape, morality is dictated by the majority.
 
I would also agree that morality is highly dependant on one's environment. If one had to survive in a world where virtually all people from time to time commited murder (something possibly true in pre-historic times) he would have no real incentive to act against such a capability for violence in himself either. On the contrary one would feel left out if he in his view expressed more hostility than the average person in his environment did (since this could lead to him being marginalised, either by others, or through reflection on his supposed differences from them in regards to basic morality).
Morality, when not taken to extremes, only serves the basic ability to socialise.
 
So, you're saying morality isn't?

I believe in an absolute morality. So, yes, I do believe morality is more than simple human survival instinct.
 
Top Bottom