More Civ 6 leaks?

[Danzo_87]

They give only 1 amenity each.

yeah, 1 amenity for each copy, but you will more than likely have multiple copies of multiple bonus resource though

 

[King Jason]

My interpretation of Ghandi is he still likes to nuke but won't do it unless already inclined to dislike you because of your own war mongering.

I don't see where you're getting that from. The quote says that the A.I. doesn't get agendas that are too similar or the exact opposite. This has has been confirmed elsewhere by Ed.

So Pedro won't get great person advocate since his agenda is pretty much the exact same thing. Conversely, Gandhi won't get Bomb maniac since it's the opposite of his main agenda.

Using different example; Harald won't get Navy Fanaticism, as that's part of his core agenda. Barbarossa won't get City-state protector as it conflicts with his core agenda.

Now, that's not to say Gandhi is never going to launch a nuke. That Agenda isn't going to dictate who does or doesn't fire a nuclear weapon. It just creates a bias to do so and like others that do the same. I think the joke is dead because if it weren't they'd make sure Gandhi could get this agenda at random, same as everyone else. So some games the players would in fact end up with a nuclear gandhi.

 

[stealth_nsk]

yeah, 1 amenity for each copy, but you will more than likely have multiple copies of multiple bonus resource though

This means if you have Buenos Aires nearby, harvesting bonus resources immediately becomes much less viable strategy.

 

[Atlas627]

Holy cow, that seems ridiculous.

Just 1/4 of a Luxury. Its worth 1 amenity, not 4.

 

[Danzo_87]

This means if you have Buenos Aires nearby, harvesting bonus resources immediately becomes much less viable strategy.

Is harvesting a viable enough strategy now? If it is, that's just further reinforce the dev's aim of play to your surrounding design choice, which can only be good

 

[stealth_nsk]

Is harvesting a viable enough strategy now? If it is, that's just further reinforce the dev's aim of play to your surrounding design choice, which can only be good

I don't think mindless harvesting is a viable strategy, but I expect more than half of bonus resources and forests to be actually harvested. We need to know more about Builder cost growth, though - you may need dozens of them.

 

[Danzo_87]

I don't think mindless harvesting is a viable strategy, but I expect more than half of bonus resources and forests to be actually harvested. We need to know more about Builder cost growth, though - you may need dozens of them.

Forest i can understand, while bonus resources is more situational imo, but i guess you could still harvest some of them even with buenos aires in play, since you more than likely wont have more cities than bonus resources within your empire

 

[qadams]

From another page on the website: when someone beats you to a wonder, the tile where the unfinished wonder is located won't be usable unless you salvage the wonder, which will refund 15% of the production spent on it.

Very cool. I like that a lot — it's far better than the cheesy, unrealistic reward of gold that you get in Civ 5.

 

[stealth_nsk]

Forest i can understand, while bonus resources is more situational imo, but i guess you could still harvest some of them even with buenos aires in play, since you more than likely wont have more cities than bonus resources within your empire

With more or less tightly packed cities you just need most of those tiles for districts or wonders. Food output from harvesting could be less interesting than production, but for newly born city it may be a very significant boost.

 

[anandus]

From another page on the website : when someone beat you to a wonder, the tile where the unfinished wonder is located won't be usable unless you salvage the wonder, which would refund 15% of the production spent on it.

Will it cost a builder charge, does anyone know?

 

[UnknownHuman]

Will it cost a builder charge, does anyone know?

It's probably like harvesting, so no.

 

[stealth_nsk]

It's probably like harvesting, so no.

Harvesting requires a builder charge.

 

[isau]

I don't see where you're getting that from. The quote says that the A.I. doesn't get agendas that are too similar or the exact opposite. This has has been confirmed elsewhere by Ed.

So Pedro won't get great person advocate since his agenda is pretty much the exact same thing. Conversely, Gandhi won't get Bomb maniac since it's the opposite of his main agenda.

Using different example; Harald won't get Navy Fanaticism, as that's part of his core agenda. Barbarossa won't get City-state protector as it conflicts with his core agenda.

Now, that's not to say Gandhi is never going to launch a nuke. That Agenda isn't going to dictate who does or doesn't fire a nuclear weapon. It just creates a bias to do so and like others that do the same. I think the joke is dead because if it weren't they'd make sure Gandhi could get this agenda at random, same as everyone else. So some games the players would in fact end up with a nuclear gandhi.

That's possible, but I assume the nuking is simply built into Ghandi's main agenda. We haven't seen the XML/data files yet of course so its possible that's not the case. My assumption is that each agenda is just an XML entry with values for various kinds of behaviors, nuking being one of them, like it was in the previous games. You could assign Ghandi a tendency to build nukes even if he normally avoids war. He won't need the random agenda to be that way.

The reason I assume this is there are several AIs with abilities that run counter to their stated agenda. Tomyris is one. She hates surprise wars, but her abilities make her one of the most suited to starting them. Her agenda likely has values for aggression turned up. There are hidden agendas that also increase aggressiveness, but she won't have to specifically roll them to use her abilities (at least we should hope so).

 

[Wolle68]

Translations are quite hard if not impossible to understand, but here are the last unknown city-states:

Kumasi (cultural) - Sovereign city-state trade route provides each one pair

2 , and was obtained from the departure city every town

+1 urban centers, aqueducts and neighborhoods are not added to the total.
Mohenjodaro (cultural) - Suzerain city center, wherever the location, are considered adequate water.
Carthage (militaristic) - Every sovereign state at the military post provides an additional trade route.
Valletta (militaristic) - Allow suzerain consumption

later urban centers and military station building walls class building will only be used

to buy, but later significantly reduced consumption.

So no Italian city states. I wonder what that's about.

 

[Cerilis]

So no Italian city states. I wonder what that's about.

Well, there's Rome and... does Frederick have Italian cities in his city list?

 

[Sansa_Stark]

Is it just me or Gorgo was deleted already?

 

[SupremacyKing2]

Is it just me or Gorgo was deleted already?

Yes, Gorgo got deleted. There is a note now where Gorgo used to be, stating that 2K has censured spoiler information.

 

[Zantetsuken]

Yes, Gorgo got deleted. There is a note now where Gorgo used to be, stating that 2K has censured spoiler information.

Things you can do to confirm something: Vehemently cover it up

Like I wasn't sure wether to trust that source completely until the question material was removed

 

[Lord Yanaek]

Or, maybe they leaked some false information on purpose and then asked for it to be removed so everyone will be convinced it's true and they can laugh after release ...

Where's my aluminium hat? I don't want to let their Sectoïd spies read my mind.

 

[durfal]

Well, there's Rome and... does Frederick have Italian cities in his city list?

So far as we have seen no. And I know he was a holy roman emperor but as leader of the German Civilization I really hope and highly suspect there are no Italian, Austrian, Czech or Dutch Cities on it's list.

Maybe not as much Italian cities as last time but I do agree that at least Venice should have been a City state.