Most annoying argument tactics

[Ecofarm]

If you're the one doing it, sure . . .

What Eran said.

Next time please keep such thoughts about your girlfriend to yourself.

I, for one, would watch Narz bang his GF. Sure, I'd be focused on her, but it's not like he's Ron Jeremy ugly.

Keep those thoughts (and your hot GF) coming!

 

[Narz]

double post

 

[Narz]

Thanks for your kind words EcoFarm.

What Eran said.

Next time please keep such thoughts about your girlfriend to yourself.

Edit : How about my thoughts about your mo...

nevermind

 

[Perfection]

Being too boring to even make fun of.

 

[punkbass2000]

Can't say I follow you.

Things are defined by their definitions which were given by their definers. Nothing wrong with this, just know that classifications are ultimately arbitrary even if useful. I blame Aristotle.

 

[Narz]

Ok. I see.

But if you can't classify things & agree to definitions & symbols how can you communicate?

 

[punkbass2000]

You can, but you must agree on the definitions. Otherwise you end up with Legal Issues.

 

[scy12]

Using the word equatist, to make a point.

 

[JollyRoger]

Using the word equatist, to make a point.

The term for someone who uses that tactic is "evadist."

 

[scy12]

The term for someone who uses that tactic is "evadist."

Well at least the word Evadist can easily be assigned to the word Evader .One then notices the similarity between Evader and Vader. As a result i guess one using the word Evadist really means that the person he describes is a sith. Which means that the person he describes is Dick Cheney. What an evadist you are .

 

[aelf]

Using the word equatist, to make a point.

That is called the subtractionist method. You subtract an opponent's argument in a vaguely a priori way

 

[scy12]

That is called the subtractionist method. You subtract an opponent's argument in a vaguely a priori way

I think self-defeat is a more suitable name for that type of argument.

 

[Bigfoot3814]

Saying: "You just don't get it."

 

[Ecofarm]

1) "If you can prove I did this, I will flog myself for being [as] stupid [as you]!!!

2) Evidence is presented.

3) Logs off.

I hate that technique. I demand gratification from groveling.

 

[C~G]

The argument that starts with how one's own argument is logical and how the debate should be based into rationality while of course the view of those that oppose that argument are somehow emotionally attached to the subject and aren't "clear minded to see the truth".

I hate arguments that are based into the style of argumentation and argument is done for the sake of argumentation.

So every time I see as someone mentions "logic" or "rationality" with his argument, I always think "here we go again..."

 

[GenMarshall]

People saying that "youre wrong" without anything to back them up.

 

[BasketCase]

Being me. Nothing else is needed, the simple fact that that panel on the left side of this post says "BasketCase" in it is enough.

There are a few users in here (most notably FriendlyFire) who automatically argue with me no matter what I post. My mere presence in a thread draws incendiary remarks.

In fact, my presence in this thread is likely to cause an argument.....

 

[scy12]

Being me. Nothing else is needed, the simple fact that that panel on the left side of this post says "BasketCase" in it is enough.

There are a few users in here (most notably FriendlyFire) who automatically argue with me no matter what I post. My mere presence in a thread draws incendiary remarks.

In fact, my presence in this thread is likely to cause an argument.....

. Argument.

 

[Bill3000]

1) "If you can prove I did this, I will flog myself for being [as] stupid [as you]!!!

2) Evidence is presented.

3) Logs off.

I hate that technique. I demand gratification from groveling.

Don't worry, I'll be sure to ask Trajan to grovel to you when he goes on fiftychat!

 

[choxorn]

Basket, I hereby declare you wrong for saying that everyone wants to argue with you!