Congratulations, you don't pay attention.we should make a list of the maps, took me a bloody half an hour to find a good plain map!
Here, 2km/px samples, and no, since it's a relatively simple case of fiddling with levels and contrast of the bathymetry example. On review I think I can save myself a lot of work by doing a better job of that (I just did contrast with that sample).Where do you get them?
and,
Will you post/link a tutorial for turning them black and white?
I don't know about the others, but mostly what I myself was doing was aesthetic recommendations (does this look good, etc.).The five you of you have created one hell of a space map!
Your browser downloads it either way, it only distorts that one post, and you have a scroll bar, so I'd just as soon you simply have to bask in the Cherenkov blue of my achievements.Was just thinking, any chance of putting it in a spoiler symph?
Photoshop for composition. For lines (like the grid and the vertical tracers) I prefer MSPaint, for all its limitations. Photoshop can probably do non-vector lines but damn if I've figured out how yet. Stars and other non-framework items will all be done in Photoshop. Star data is from here, particularly these two maps.What program did you use?
The center of Galactic Coordinate System is not Sagittarius A*. Otherwise, yes.I take it that the map is set to the galactic plane with 0 deg pointing to Sag A*?
Somewhere between Apparent Magnitude < 6.5 and Spectral Class > M. There are some K's not covered on the 50LY map but i tend to not care because it's doubtful most of them would support life anyway. This is a general resource. Actually utilizing it requires significantly more pairing down and determination of system content (since most of us aren't willing to wait 12-30 years for these systems to be mapped by planet finding missions).Also, what's the criteria for inclusion? Absolute Magnitude?