G-Man
A One Man's War
I'm afraid all my sources are in hebrew... Maybe you can ask someone to translate it for you
http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/1,7340,L-770149,FF.html
http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/1,7340,L-770149,FF.html
Nice - The Gang War Spreads
- Thread starter VoodooAce
- Start date
FearlessLeader2
Fundamentalist Loon
And maybe it would be better if you switched to another brand of crack. Give the Arabs control of those locations, and artillery fire will be raining on Israel in short order. Neither side should control that land.
Let's keep it friendly here, Okay, pops?
And who do you propose should be in control of these areas? I still think it would be best if the Arab population in Palestine would be under the protection of Arab soldiers, Or let the Palestinians actually have their own nation, without having to be some sort of satellite state to Israel, that can't trade or make treaties with who they want.
G-Man
A One Man's War
The Palestinians today are very a weak body. When Palestine will be formed it will probably become someone's sattelite country, and we'd rether avoid another Lebanon.
And that idea of arab Israelis having soldiers is nothing less then idiotic. Where did you get the idea to have two armies in a single country?!?
And that idea of arab Israelis having soldiers is nothing less then idiotic. Where did you get the idea to have two armies in a single country?!?
animepornstar
Deity
peacekeeping troops from arabic countries in pa would might work. maybe the terrorists won´t let them lose their faces.
PinkyGen
Paper copying intern
Yeah, Israel is just going to allow foreign troops right next door.
And I'm sure these troops will be unbiased. 
G-Man
A One Man's War
Why would anyone want peace keepong arab troops? The Palestinians have a large army of their own.
G-Man
A One Man's War
They have a police force with cmouflaged uniforms and M-16 as a standard personal weapon
G-Man
A One Man's War
The Egyptian army is defenatly larger but I thought we agreed they won't invade PA areas so what does it have to do with anything?
.:KNAS:.
Civfanatic
Im not an expert when it comes to the middle east, but to me it seems like when ever the Israeli kill someone (most often innocent, but not always) they get a ton of **** for it. When the Palestinians kills innocent civilians, no one says anything, no one says "baaaaad Arafat" and want him to show up for trial in Belgium, even though he is a terrorist. So what can the Israelis do? Sit idly by while their people die? Hell no, they retaliate, the same as i would do
G-Man
A One Man's War
And what will this peace force do? Will it make closures? No. But they also can't allow Palestinians to enter Israeli territory without checking that they don't carry weapons. So the Palestinians will stay in their own territory and starve to death.
And Israel kills very few civilians. It's just that CNN always say "Palestinians" and not "terrorists" or "Armed Palestinians" so it sounds like they're civilians.
And Israel kills very few civilians. It's just that CNN always say "Palestinians" and not "terrorists" or "Armed Palestinians" so it sounds like they're civilians.
G-Man
A One Man's War
The Palestinians aren't punished. They, like the Israelis, are victims of Arafat's decision not to fight terrorism, that forced Israel to fight terrorism by itself.
Divis
Ball5 groupie
"And I have found in real life, a convinced atheist will call you stupid and argue your butt off longer and louder than a Born again Christian or an Imam.
People who pretend any recent wars are about religion forget that the object of those wars seems to always be land, money, resources, social welfare, or homeland security."
Atheists will debate because they know they have the winning hand. Anyone who argues for a religion just has a circular argument:
God exists because the Bible (or any other religious document)says he does.
God wrote the Bible.
It may be true that most recent wars are over land, money... etc. but, some of the bloodiest few of all time have had a major religious overtone. WWII and The Crusades?
People who pretend any recent wars are about religion forget that the object of those wars seems to always be land, money, resources, social welfare, or homeland security."
Atheists will debate because they know they have the winning hand. Anyone who argues for a religion just has a circular argument:
God exists because the Bible (or any other religious document)says he does.
God wrote the Bible.
It may be true that most recent wars are over land, money... etc. but, some of the bloodiest few of all time have had a major religious overtone. WWII and The Crusades?
G-Man
A One Man's War
People canfanaticly beileve in whatever they want. Religions, at least, have some good measures as well (Don't kill, don't steal, etc.). It's better then believing your race is better then all others or that killing innocent people will bring peace. Just remember that not all fanatics are religious and not all religious people are fanatics.
VoodooAce
Emperor
This is bullsh!t guys.
I've actually been called a Nazi. I HATE Nazis and fascists with all of my heart. G-Man, just because I think Israel is JUST AS MUCH TO BLAME for the violence there, DOS NOT MAKE ME A NAZI!!!!!!!!!!! I mean, damn man.
Just because I disagree with you DOES NOT MAKE ME A NAZI.
How would you like it if I called you a nazi, bro. You wouldn't hate it any more than me, i'll tell you that.
Sharon's 'innocent' trek to a holy spot for Israelis and Jews is one thing. Him going under those conditions, when everybody knew AHEAD OF TIME that it would cause an eruption of violence, and to STILL GO, despite the fact that he knew he was causing the deaths of many, is evil....sorry. HE is evil, not Jews, OK???????
This is the attitude that is just too damn prevelant. G-Man, it is people like you and Osama and Sharon and Arafat that make the concept of world peace a pipe dream. Thanks bunches.
I've actually been called a Nazi. I HATE Nazis and fascists with all of my heart. G-Man, just because I think Israel is JUST AS MUCH TO BLAME for the violence there, DOS NOT MAKE ME A NAZI!!!!!!!!!!! I mean, damn man.
Just because I disagree with you DOES NOT MAKE ME A NAZI.
How would you like it if I called you a nazi, bro. You wouldn't hate it any more than me, i'll tell you that.
Sharon's 'innocent' trek to a holy spot for Israelis and Jews is one thing. Him going under those conditions, when everybody knew AHEAD OF TIME that it would cause an eruption of violence, and to STILL GO, despite the fact that he knew he was causing the deaths of many, is evil....sorry. HE is evil, not Jews, OK???????
This is the attitude that is just too damn prevelant. G-Man, it is people like you and Osama and Sharon and Arafat that make the concept of world peace a pipe dream. Thanks bunches.
Similar threads
