Now, about the Koreans.....

I did a report on Korean history :p

And Korea is only like 3000-2000 years old.
As I said, East Asians have a skill for making their country's history as grand and long as possible.....
 
.................... = =;

anybody know the DETAILS?

also you completely forgot about the mythical Gojoseon and our supposed origins (South Korean insist that original Koreans were a branch of a Mogol tribe who settled in the Korean peninsula.......(although I doubt that Mongols would ever settle down. they still ride around Mongolia on horseback which proves tobe very frustrating for Mongolian officials cuz they wont be ab to make a accurate count of the population)

The Koreans are descendants of Altaic settlers. They later colonized Japan. Mongols? A bit of a stretch. Also, Gojoseon didn't exist :p. That's like me claiming King Arthur as a real king or that Jesus actually came to America.

The Koreans first developed around 100 BC. They then made 3-4 cool civs. Then they united. They then made a cool, unique, Asian-y civ. They made metal movable type. They invented a cool alphabet. Then they made an efficient gov. Then they got conquered. Then they played Starcraft.


(Obviously there's a ton more, but these are the most important)
 
Goguryeo broke the Sui. philippe made reference to this earlier.

Also, Eretz, please use the friggin' multiquote button. It is there for a reason.
 
I guess you can just mix China and Japan, and shake well.

I would have given some thought to China and Korea's history being mixed; but Japn is a whole different story!!!(except for the Korean Kingdom of Baekjae, which has been a point ocontroversy between Korean and Japanese scholars, for the Japanese claim ito be a part of their history, hwile KOreans think not; what further complicates the problem is that the current Tenno of Nihon(Akihito for anybody who doest wht Im talking about)claimed tt one of his ancestors were from Baekjae descent.......)
East Asian scholars really should put nationalism away and look at history objetively.....History isnt supposed to be biased in the first place;its a objective view of what events occured during the past
 
Does anybody know General Ulchi Mundok?
 
Huayna Capac357 , saying Gojoseon didnt exist wont make you very welcome in Korea......(although I do understand wht you are suggesting)
 
Agriculture didn't even exist in Korea in 2333 BC. And you know something is a little fishy when it was founded by a half-bear half-man :p
 
The Koreans are descendants of Altaic settlers. They later colonized Japan.

Full stop there.

The people who colonized Japan came through the Korean peninsula, obviously.

Whether or not they could in any fair way be described as actual Koreans, rather than as nomadic or semi-nomadic groups that happened to be moving through Korea before they got to Japan, and how much any of these group could honestly be described as Korean...that's a whole other ball game, and one most of my university profs (university of montreal, Asian studies center) had the good sense to stay out of (those who didn't have that sense were the Korean profs themselves. I didn't have any Japanese prof, but I don't imagine their being much better), present both views, and say "That's mostly a matter for nationalistic claptrap".

The debate can be summarized as follow:

Korea: "HEY U UR EMPROR IZ KOREAN ROFLOL"
JAPAN : "O RLY?"
K: "YES RLY"
J: "NO WAI"
K: "YES WAI"
(etc)
 
Goguryeo broke the Sui. philippe made reference to this earlier.
Yep. He beat the Chinese saving Korea from another occupation.

General Ulchi Mundok was a Goguryo general who defended Goguryo from the invading Sui army; the Sui army was butchered by the Goguryo army (the Sui army was much more bigger in numbers than the Goguryo army)
 
Full stop there.

The people who colonized Japan came through the Korean peninsula, obviously.

Whether or not they could in any fair way be described as actual Koreans, rather than as nomadic or semi-nomadic groups that happened to be moving through Korea before they got to Japan, and how much any of these group could honestly be described as Korean...that's a whole other ball game, and one most of my university profs (university of montreal, Asian studies center) had the good sense to stay out of (those who didn't have that sense were the Korean profs themselves. I didn't have any Japanese prof, but I don't imagine their being much better), present both views, and say "That's mostly a matter for nationalistic claptrap".

The debate can be summarized as follow:

Korea: "HEY U UR EMPROR IZ KOREAN ROFLOL"
JAPAN : "O RLY?"
K: "YES RLY"
J: "NO WAI"
K: "YES WAI"
(etc)

Exactly my point. Aand the fact is there is no evidence all of these hpotheses by both Japanese and Korean scholars. They are never objective.......(well, i guess the most crazy scholars are the Chinese scholars unde Goverment payroll; they make no sense at all)
 
Full stop there.

The people who colonized Japan came through the Korean peninsula, obviously.

Whether or not they could in any fair way be described as actual Koreans, rather than as nomadic or semi-nomadic groups that happened to be moving through Korea before they got to Japan, and how much any of these group could honestly be described as Korean...that's a whole other ball game, and one most of my university profs (university of montreal, Asian studies center) had the good sense to stay out of (those who didn't have that sense were the Korean profs themselves. I didn't have any Japanese prof, but I don't imagine their being much better), present both views, and say "That's mostly a matter for nationalistic claptrap".

The debate can be summarized as follow:

Korea: "HEY U UR EMPROR IZ KOREAN ROFLOL"
JAPAN : "O RLY?"
K: "YES RLY"
J: "NO WAI"
K: "YES WAI"
(etc)


I meant Altaic settlers later settled Japan. In no way am I implying that Japan is Korea's colony. Or that they speak in lol.
 
I meant Altaic settlers later settled Japan. In no way am I implying that Japan is Korea's colony. Or that they speak in lol.
I wish it was though... then Koreans would be the conquerors of the world!!!
lol
 
FOR CHRIST'S SAKE ERETZ, USE THE MULTI-QUOTE BUTTON! YOU'VE ALREADY BEEN TOLD TO, AT LEAST TWICE!
 
:):):):):):):):):):)):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):)
 
um......well the muslims at least have a sphere of influence(even if it is just nominal);Korea has no influence or a sphere of influence on anybody.
Poland had an interesting history;personally liked the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and the pre-WWII period of their history when Pidulski(i cant remember how to spell his name correctly) sent the Soviet soldiers under Tukachevsky away( I recall that this war was called the Polish-Soviet War of1922)............
The oly influence Korea has on anybody is the electronics industry(Samsung, LG,etc) and the auto industry(Hyundai, KIA))

You missed the joke there
 
You missed the joke there
I've noticed he misses most of them. He still doesn't seem to get my Mel Gibson joke in his other thread.
 
I've noticed he misses most of them. He still doesn't seem to get my Mel Gibson joke in his other thread.
I do get your JOKE about Mel Gibson.
And I do dark humor most of the times. I just never tried dark humor on this forum.
You missed the joke there
Actally, I did get the joke there,but I wanted make a point I had in mind after I read your joke.
 
Korea has no influence or a sphere of influence on anybody.

Well, Paekhae (sp?) ruled over Manchuria for a while. Otherwise Korea being sandwiched in between Japan and China didn't really have a chance to expand out of the peninsula. (There was significant migration to Japan, China, Russia and elsewhere during the 19th century though).

The oly influence Korea has on anybody is the electronics industry(Samsung, LG,etc) and the auto industry(Hyundai, KIA))

That's actually very significant. The Korea Republic transformed itself from a authoritarian, agrarian, heavily cratered half of a country to a democratic economic great power in less than 40 years. That is no small achievement.
 
Back
Top Bottom