In terms of agenda, I imagine Aminitore's will focus on something anti-Egyptian, since they were historic enemies. Maybe she hates any civ that builds sphinxes LOL. Anyway, I just don't see her and Cleo getting along...
If it is a second leader for Egypt, I'm thinking Senusret 1. It would fit with the scenario which is building temples to Amun (not Amun-Ra), and competing with Nubia. Probably he'd have his own bonus toward production or religion.
That's true, but do not forget it could very well be a second SEA civ. EP and I are hoping its Vietnam, while we both doubt it and think our chances of winning the lottery is better, but it could be, however slim. But, I do honestly hope its a second civ.
In terms of agenda, I imagine Aminitore's will focus on something anti-Egyptian, since they were historic enemies. Maybe she hates any civ that builds sphinxes LOL. Anyway, I just don't see her and Cleo getting along...
I wouldn't call Nubia and Egypt traditional enemies. They went to war at times, but they were also close trading partners, and at one time a Nubian dynasty ruled Egypt; meanwhile, the Nubians were ardent admirers of all things Egyptian and modeled their fashion and culture closely on Egyptian trends. In-game, meanwhile, Cleopatra is likely to like Aminatore because of her large army.
If it is a second leader for Egypt, I'm thinking Senusret 1. It would fit with the scenario which is building temples to Amun (not Amun-Ra), and competing with Nubia.
Maybe not, but it's more likely than nothing informing them. I'm wondering if there will be changes to Egypt's current form in a patch as well. The reason being, Nubia basically seems like Egypt 2.0.
That's true, but do not forget it could very well be a second SEA civ. EP and I are hoping its Vietnam, while we both doubt it and think our chances of winning the lottery is better, but it could be, however slim. But, I do honestly hope its a second civ.
I think it will either be two leaders for Indonesia (remember, whatever the additional thing is, it has to be from SEA or Africa), or Khmer. Khmer and the Srijavaya have a history together, which could suit a scenario.
I think it will either be two leaders for Indonesia (remember, whatever the additional thing is, it has to be from SEA or Africa), or Khmer. Khmer and the Srijavaya have a history together, which could suit a scenario.
I think it will either be two leaders for Indonesia (remember, whatever the additional thing is, it has to be from SEA or Africa), or Khmer. Khmer and the Srijavaya have a history together, which could suit a scenario.
Funny thing is from what we know/speculate at the moment, Poland is the weakest of the DLC civs, and Poland is still above-average. Some of the vanilla civs already need a huge makeover.
Desert start bias is bad and this nation doesn't really get anything to help with all important strong early yields that a plains/grassland hill can provide, I'm talking about a heavy desert start, desert all round... 40% off districts with a pyramid is nice but you have less +prod yields due to desert. The Archer is key to the strength of this nation and it goes obsolete quickly. I'm not a fan of war but it will be nice on defense against barbs or early DoW from AI civ.
None of those pyramids in the video were workable tiles, hopefully they get boosts from tech/civics in addition to districts.
Any news on additions to the main game in this DLC, Like a new wonder or something? I don't play scenarios just the main game.
Funny thing is from what we know/speculate at the moment, Poland is the weakest of the DLC civs, and Poland is still above-average. Some of the vanilla civs already need a huge makeover.
I believe that Firaxis intentionally made the DLC civs generally stronger than the average vanilla civ to entice purchasing DLC, may it be à la carte or the Digital Deluxe Edition.
Desert start bias is bad and this nation doesn't really get anything to help with all important strong early yields that a plains/grassland hill can provide, I'm talking about a heavy desert start, desert all round... 40% off districts with a pyramid is nice but you have less +prod yields due to desert. The Archer is key to the strength of this nation and it goes obsolete quickly. I'm not a fan of war but it will be nice on defense against barbs or early DoW from AI civ.
None of those pyramids in the video were workable tiles, hopefully they get boosts from tech/civics in addition to districts.
Any news on additions to the main game in this DLC, Like a new wonder or something?
Found capital on floodplane bias, spam archers, conquor everything around you that isn't in the desert because archer rush is already strong, nevermind with stronger archers, build Petra in capital, spam end-turn and place bets on which victory screen you'll see.
Maybe not, but it's more likely than nothing informing them. I'm wondering if there will be changes to Egypt's current form in a patch as well. The reason being, Nubia basically seems like Egypt 2.0.
Found capital on floodplane bias, spam archers, conquor everything around you that isn't in the desert because archer rush is already strong, nevermind with stronger archers, build Petra in capital, spam end-turn and place bets on which victory screen you'll see.
That is my only problem with Nubia. From the looks of it, they really limit your viable strategies and force you into Archer spam every single game. As if we didn't have enough warmongers...
He posted again right before the First Look was revealed in the other thread, but it got lost in the hype wave. I get the impression he knows, or is, someone at Firaxis.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
